Blanching of potato with superheated steam and hot water spray

LWT ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1035-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itaru Sotome ◽  
Makiko Takenaka ◽  
Shigenobu Koseki ◽  
Yukio Ogasawara ◽  
Yoshitaka Nadachi ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-92
Author(s):  
Kazunori Sasaki ◽  
Itaru Sotome ◽  
Hiroshi Okadome ◽  
Yumi Kai ◽  
Tomoyuki Oki ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itaru SOTOME ◽  
Yukio OGASAWARA ◽  
Yoshitaka NADACHI ◽  
Makiko TAKENAKA ◽  
Hiroshi OKADOME ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Farshid Zabihian ◽  
Alan S. Fung ◽  
Fabio Schuler

Gas turbine-based power plants generate a significant portion of world’s electricity. This paper presents the modeling of a gas turbine-based cogeneration cycle. One of the reasons for the relatively low efficiency of a single gas turbine cycle is the waste of high-grade energy at its exhaust stream. In order to recover this wasted energy, steam and/or hot water can be cogenerated to improve the cycle efficiency. In this work, a cogeneration power plant is introduced to use this wasted energy to produce superheated steam for industrial processes. The cogeneration system model was developed based on the data from the Whitby cogeneration power plant in ASPEN PLUS®. The model was validated against the operational data of the existing power plant. The electrical and total (both electrical and thermal) efficiencies were around 40% and 70% (LHV), respectively. It is shown that cogenerating electricity and steam not only significantly improve the general efficiency of the cycle but it can also recover the output and efficiency losses of the gas turbine as a result of high ambient temperature by generating more superheated steam. Furthermore, this work shows that the model could capture the operation of the systems with an acceptable accuracy.


Author(s):  
Kourtney A. Daniels ◽  
Katherine Modrow ◽  
Wesley N. Osburn ◽  
Thomas Matt Taylor

Water use for antimicrobial intervention application for beef harvest has come under increased scrutiny in recent years in an effort to enhance water conservation during beef harvest and fabrication. This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of beef safety interventions for reducing surrogates of the Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) on beef cuts while lowering intervention-purposed water use for a Small or Very Small beef establishment. Beef briskets, shoulder/clods, and rounds were inoculated with a gelatin-based slurry containing 6.8±0.3 log CFU/g non-pathogenic E. coli . After 30 min of attachment, inoculated cuts were treated by: conventional lactic acid spray (LA; 2.5%, 55°C), lactic acid spray delivered by an electrostatic spray handheld wand (ESS; 2.5%, 55°C), hot water spray (HW; 82°C), recycled hot water spray (RW; 82°C) wherein previously applied hot water was collected, thermally pasteurized to 82°C, or left untreated (CON). 100 mL of each treatment was sprayed onto marked surfaces of inoculated cuts, after which surviving surrogate E. coli were enumerated. LA and ESS treatments produced greater reductions (1.0-1.1 log CFU/300 cm 2 ) versus hot water interventions (0.3-0.5 log CFU/300 cm 2 ) ( p =<0.0001). Recycling of water reduced water losses by no less than 45% on RW-treated beef cuts. Low water beef safety interventions offer Small and Very Small inspected beef establishments opportunities to incrementally reduce water use during intervention application, but not necessarily without loss of pathogen reduction efficacy.


Geophysics ◽  
1963 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. S. Tuman

If an atom bomb is detonated in an aquifer, superheated steam will be produced, giving rise to a pressure front in the capillaries. The high‐pressure vapor will force the neighboring fluid through capillary channels generating streaming electric potentials which we have called the thermotelluric potentials. In this note a preliminary study is made of the pressure front transient and a nonlinear differential equation is obtained. This equation can be solved, if necessary, numerically by difference methods utilizing a digital computer. However, instead some experiments were performed and the streaming potential was measured on a few very porous and permeable sandstones. The order of magnitude of the signal to be generated by such phenomenon is estimated using the experimental data, and some assumptions. It appears that in some cases the signal superimposed on the natural telluric field might be above the noise level. Thermo‐telluric potentials should also be present during an igneous intrusion and during the diffusion of hot water in geysers, etc. The possible use of the phenomenon of thermo‐telluric potentials in the study of underground geological activities is intriguing.


Author(s):  
Sean Comeau ◽  
Richard Ianniello ◽  
Wai Wong ◽  
Shawn Gerstenberger

2011 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 1684-1691 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. E. MARTÍNEZ-GONZÁLES ◽  
L. MARTÍNEZ-CHÁVEZ ◽  
C. MARTÍNEZ-CÁRDENAS ◽  
A. CASTILLO

The objectives of this study were to compare the effectiveness of various washing treatments for reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella sp., and Listeria monocytogenes populations on orange surfaces and to measure the effect of some of these treatments in preventing the transfer of pathogens during juice extraction. Orange surfaces inoculated with L. monocytogenes or a mixture of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium were washed by water spray and then sprayed with or dipped in water at 80°C for 1 min, 70% ethanol for 15, 30, or 45 s or 1, 2, or 4 min, 2 or 4% lactic acid solution at 55°C for 15, 30, or 45 s or 1, 2, or 4 min, or 200 mg/liter hypochlorite at pH 6.5 or 10 for 15 s. The surviving populations of these pathogens on the oranges were enumerated after each treatment. In a further stage, the ability of these pathogens to be transferred to the juice during extraction was tested. Juice was obtained from inoculated oranges that were subjected to selected treatments using chlorine, lactic acid, ethanol, and hot water as described above, and then bacterial counts in orange juice were determined. The application of these treatments reduced the populations of pathogens on orange surfaces by 1.9 to >4.9 log, 1.9 to >4.6 log, and 1.4 to 3.1 log cycles for E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium, and L. monocytogenes, respectively. The treatments using hot water or lactic acid showed greater reductions than other treatments. The time, antimicrobial concentration, and form of application affected the bacterial reduction. All treatments resulted in undetectable counts in the juice. Nevertheless, pathogens were recovered by the enrichment-plating method. Treatment of oranges before juice extraction may reduce the risk associated with consuming orange juice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document