Effect of material configuration and welding parameter on weld formability and mechanical properties of bobbin tool friction stir welded Al-Cu and Al-Mg aluminum alloys

2021 ◽  
pp. 111518
Author(s):  
Dong Wu ◽  
Wenya Li ◽  
Xichang Liu ◽  
Yanjun Gao ◽  
Quan Wen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Aluminum Alloys ◽  
Welding Parameter ◽  
Friction Stir

Microstructure and Mechanical Properties at the Unsteady Areas of Non-Linear Friction Stir Welding

2007 ◽  
Vol 561-565 ◽  
pp. 1059-1062 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Takahara ◽  
Masato Tsujikawa ◽  
Sung Wook Chung ◽  
Y. Okawa ◽  
Kenji Higashi
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Friction Stir Welding ◽  
Welding Parameter ◽  
Butt Joints ◽  
Friction Stir ◽  
Non Linear ◽  
Linear Friction ◽  
Fsw Parameters ◽  
Five Axis ◽  
Welding Direction

The influence of tool control in non-linear friction stir welding (FSW) on mechanical properties of joints was investigated. FSW is widely applied to linear joints. It is impossible for five axis FSW machines, however, to keep all the FSW parameters in optimum conditions at non-linear welding. Non-linear FSW joints should be made by compromise with the order of priority for FSW parameters. The tensile test results of butt joints with rectangular change in welding direction on plate plane (L-shaped butt joints) with various welding parameter change. It was found that turn to the retreating side is encouraged when welding direction change. And the method of zero inclination tool angle is effective at non-linear and plane welding.

Evaluation of dissimilar joints properties of 5083-H12 and 6061-T6 aluminum alloys produced by tungsten inert gas and friction stir welding

2015 ◽  
Vol 231 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morteza Ghaffarpour ◽  
Mohammad Kazemi ◽  
Mohammad Javad Mohammadi Sefat ◽  
Ahmad Aziz ◽  
Kamran Dehghani
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Friction Stir Welding ◽  
Aluminum Alloys ◽  
Traverse Speed ◽  
Inert Gas ◽  
Dissimilar Joints ◽  
Friction Stir ◽  
Dissimilar Aluminum Alloys ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Welding Processes

In the present study, friction stir welding (FSW) and tungsten inert gas (TIG) techniques were used to join the dissimilar aluminum alloys of 5083-H12 and 6061-T6. The laboratory tests were designed using design of experiment (DOE) method. Variables for the FSW process were the rotational speed, traverse speed, shoulder diameter, and pin diameter. They changed in ranges of 700–2500 r/min, 25–400 mm/min, 10–14 mm, and 2–4 mm, respectively. In the case of TIG process, the variables were current intensity, traverse speed, and tilt angle. These parameters varied from 80 to 90 A, 200 to 400 mm/min, and 3° to 12°, respectively. The optimum amounts of parameters were obtained using response surface methodology (RSM). The RSM-based model was developed to predict ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of the welds produced. In FSW, the difference between predicted and measured UTS was about 1.28% and in TIG it was 1.78%. The good agreement between experimental and predicted results indicates the high accuracy of the developed model. Mechanical properties and also the microstructure of the welds were compared after optimizing both welding processes using RSM. The results showed that the welds produced by FSW indicated a considerably higher quality and also improved mechanical properties compared to TIG. Properties of the joints obtained by FSW in single-sided joints were more desirable. In the double-sided welds obtained by FSW these differences were of an even higher significance.

Mechanical Properties of Joints in Friction Stir Welding of Aluminum Alloys

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 916-921
Author(s):  
A. N. Feofanov ◽  
V. V. Ovchinnikov ◽  
A. M. Gubin
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Friction Stir Welding ◽  
Aluminum Alloys ◽  
Friction Stir

Effects of Post Weld Heat Treatments (PWHT) on Friction Stir Welded AA2219-T87 Joints

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad W. Dewan ◽  
Muhammad A. Wahab ◽  
Khurshida Sharmin
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Aluminum Alloys ◽  
Yield Strength ◽  
Solution Treatment ◽  
Welding Process ◽  
Alloying Elements ◽  
Age Hardening ◽  
Experimental Program ◽  
Friction Stir ◽  
Aging Period

Friction Stir Welding (FSW) offers significantly better performance on aluminum alloy joints compared to the conventional fusion arc welding techniques; however, plastic deformation, visco-plastic flow of metals, and complex non-uniform heating cycles during FSW processes, result in dissolution of alloying elements, intrinsic microstructural changes, and post-weld residual stress development. As a consequence, about 30% reduction in ultimate strength (UTS) and 60% reduction in yield strength (YS) were observed in defect-free, as-welded AA2219-T87 joints. PWHT is a common practice to refine grain-coarsened microstructures which removes or redistributes post-weld residual stresses; and improves mechanical properties of heat-treatable welded aluminum alloys by precipitation hardening. An extensive experimental program was undertaken on PWHT of FS-welded AA2219-T87 to obtain optimum PWHT conditions and improvement of the tensile properties. Artificial age-hardening (AH) helped in the precipitation of supersaturated alloying elements produced around weld nugget area during the welding process. As a result, an average 20% improvement in YS and 5% improvements in UTS was observed in age-hardened (AH-170°C-18h) specimens as compared to AW specimens. To achieve full benefit of PWHT, solution-treatment followed by age-hardening (STAH) was performed on FS-welded AA2219-T87 specimens. Solution-treatment (ST) helps in the grain refinement and formation of supersaturated precipitates in aluminum alloys. Age-hardening of ST specimens help in the precipitation of alloying elements around grain boundaries and strengthen the specimens. Optimum aging period is important to achieve better mechanical properties. For FS-welded AA2219-T87 peak aging time was 5 hours at 170°C. STAH-170°C -5h treated specimens showed about 78% JE based on UTS, 61% JE based on yield strength, and 36% JE based on tensile toughness values of base metal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document