Probabilistic seismic safety assessment of a CANDU 6 nuclear power plant including ambient vibration tests: Case study

2016 ◽  
Vol 304 ◽  
pp. 125-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Nour ◽  
Abdelhalim Cherfaoui ◽  
Vladimir Gocevski ◽  
Pierre Léger
Author(s):  
Zhao Wang ◽  
Jianfeng Yang ◽  
Weijin Wang ◽  
Bingchen Feng ◽  
Xiaoming Zhang

For seismic safety evaluation method of nuclear power plant, nuclear power plant seismic margin analysis (SMA) and nuclear power plant seismic probability safety assessment (SPSA) are the most widely used methods. SMA is a method base on deterministic theory. Seismic capacity is valued by high confidence and low failure probability (HCLPF). Through the seismic failure logic of structure, system and components (SSCs), the method can calculated the HCLPF of the whole nuclear power plant, and verify whether the plant can withstand a SSE earthquake test. The SPSA method is the most widely used seismic safety assessment method based on probability theory. Through the analysis and quantification of earthquake accident sequence, a SPSA project can fully identify the seismic risk of nuclear power plant and seismic weak points. Also SPSA can guide the nuclear power plant seismic safety improvement. No matter which method is used to analyze the seismic safety of nuclear power plant, it is necessary to analyze and calculate the seismic fragility of the SSCs. SMA method needs to use a large number of HCLPF data, and seismic fragility analysis and calculation results is one of the main sources of HCLPF data. The SPSA method needs to use seismic fragility data of SSCs which are list in the seismic equipment list (SEL) as input data, so that it can support the quantitative analysis of the risk assessment model. Because of the existence of uncertainty, the seismic fragilities cannot be put to directly logic operation. This brings great difficulty to the using of fragility data. In the paper, the logic operation method and the uncertainty analysis method of seismic fragility is studied, and the calculation program is compiled based on the Monte Carlo method. In this paper, a program is used to calculate the case. The performance of the program is verified and the uncertainty of the system fragility is analyzed. Due to the existence of uncertainty, the fragility cannot put into the numerical calculation directly. In this paper, the calculation method of the failure frequency of components is studied, and the corresponding program is developed by using Monte Carlo method. In this paper, a program is used to calculate the failure frequency of the components under different ground motion levels, and the uncertainty of the failure frequency is also studied.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoseon Choi ◽  
Seung Gyu Hyun

<p>According to strict criteria step by step for site selection, design, construction and operation, the seismic safety of nuclear power plant (NPP) sites in South Korea are secured by considering design basis earthquake (DBE) level capable of withstanding the maximum ground motions that can occur on the site. Therefore, it is intended to summarize DBE level and its evaluation details for NPP sites in several countries.</p><p>Similar but different terms are used for DBE from country to country, i.e. safe shutdown earthquake (SSE), design earthquake (DE), SL2, Ss, and maximum calculated earthquake (MCE). They may differ when applied to actual seismic design process, and only refer to approximate comparisons. This script used DBE as a representative term, and DBE level was based on horizontal values.</p><p>The DBE level of NPP sites depends on seismic activity of the area. Japan and Western United States, where earthquakes occur more frequently than South Korea, have high DBE values. The DBE level of NPP sites in South Korea has been confirmed to be similar or higher compared to that of Central and Eastern Unites Sates and Europe, which have similar seismic activity.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document