scholarly journals Trends of oral cavity, oropharyngeal and laryngeal cancer incidence in Scotland (1975–2012) – A socioeconomic perspective

Oral Oncology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 70-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitana Purkayastha ◽  
Alex D. McMahon ◽  
John Gibson ◽  
David I. Conway
2011 ◽  
pp. 191-198
Author(s):  
Michelle E Denison ◽  
Libia Soto ◽  
Carlos Alfonso Reyes-Ortiz

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the association between aging of population and incidence of oral cavity and pharynx cancer at the country level in the American continent. Methods: An ecological study at the country level. Countries’ data for oral cavity and pharynx cancer incidence comes from the International Agency for Cancer Research (GLOBOCAN 2002). Twenty eight countries were included from North America, Central America, and South America. The dependent variables were the countries’ oral cavity and pharynx cancer incidence rates (per 100,000/ year) by sex, overall and age-specific groups, 0-64 (younger population) and 65+ (older population), and the main independent variable was the countries’ aging population (% of persons 65 years and older). Other variables considered were per-capita gross national income and prevalence of smoking by sex at the country level. Results: Overall countries’ level of oral cavity and pharynx cancer incidence rates were strongly correlated with the countries’ aging population (p<0.01). In adjusted regression analyses, the countries’ aging population was significantly associated with overall oral cavity and pharynx cancer incidence rates for male (p<0.0001, p=0.0003) and female (p=0.0025, p=0.0134) populations. Conclusion: Countries’ aging population was associated with increased countries’ oral cavity and pharynx cancer incidence rates in the American continent.


2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darien J. Weatherspoon ◽  
Amit Chattopadhyay ◽  
Shahdokht Boroumand ◽  
Isabel Garcia

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-52
Author(s):  
Michaelsam E. Econ ◽  
Ronaldo G. Soriano

Objective: To describe a prototype improvised hand held device for alaryngeal speech. Methods: Design: Instrument Innovation Setting: Tertiary Private Hospital Participants:        Four listeners with normal hearing, were native Tagalog-speakers and had no previous experience with alaryngeal speech types participated in initial trials.   Results: The prototype PHONETOVOX was fabricated using a soundproofed cellphone casing with an intra-oral sound port attachment and a cellphone was loaded with Pocket Talkbox v. 1.4.0 software. The device was tested for its ability to produce intelligible speech by using the cellphone as a substitute for the larynx using oral cavity resonators and articulators, producing a synthesized sound mimicking the human voice. The PHONETOVOX produced intelligible words. Initial testing using a C-V-C Tagalog Word List had 4 listeners identify 34, 35, 47, and 54 out of 93 words (37 to 58%), with an overall average intelligibility of 46%.   Conclusion: Despite its restrictions in articulation and the wide range of results from the four listeners, our initial results may suggest the potential of PHONETOVOX as another modality for alaryngeal speech comparable to the 36 – 38 % intelligibility of commercially-available devices. Further trials with actual laryngectomees are needed to further establish intelligibility and acceptability.   Keywords: Laryngectomy, Alaryngeal speech, Laryngeal Cancer  


1989 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 755-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul C. Yang ◽  
David B. Thomas ◽  
Janet R. Daling ◽  
Scott Davis

2016 ◽  
Vol 139 (3) ◽  
pp. 574-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boukje A.C. van Dijk ◽  
Marieke T. Brands ◽  
Sandra M.E. Geurts ◽  
Matthias A.W. Merkx ◽  
Jan L.N. Roodenburg

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing-Min Xia ◽  
Chuan-Ming Zheng ◽  
Ming-Hua Ge ◽  
Shuang-Shuang Zhang ◽  
Zhuo Tan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12060-12060
Author(s):  
Hyuna Sung ◽  
Noorie Hyun ◽  
K Robin Yabroff ◽  
Ahmedin Jemal

12060 Background: The number of cancer survivors who develop new cancers is projected to grow in the US. Few studies, however, have provided a comprehensive overview of the contemporary pattern in the risk of subsequent primary cancer (SPC) among survivors of adult-onset cancers. Herein, we evaluate overall and type-specific risks of SPCs among adult-onset cancer survivors by first primary cancer types and sex. Methods: We assessed the excess risk of SPCs among 1,442,374 persons aged 20-84 years who were diagnosed with first primary cancers from 1992-2010 and survived ≥5 years in the 12 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. We expressed the risks using excess absolute risk (EAR) per 10,000 person-years and standardized incidence ratio (SIR) by first primary cancer types and sex, compared to those expected in the general population. We also estimated percent contributions of each specific type of SPCs to the total EAR for all first primary cancers combined by sex. Results: The overall risk of SPCs was higher than expected for 24 of the 34 first primary types among male survivors and for 28 of the 35 first primary types among female survivors. The greatest SIR and EAR were estimated after laryngeal cancer in both men (SIR = 1.74, 95%CI = 1.67-1.82; EAR = 159.3, 95%CI = 143.6-175.5) and women (SIR = 2.48, 95% CI = 2.26-2.73; EAR = 202.7; 95%CI = 171.8-236). There were 290 type-specific associations with significantly higher risk of SPC, 36% of which being reciprocal, predominantly among smoking-associated, HPV-associated, and hematologic cancers. The SIRs in men ranged from 1.05 (95%CI = 1.00-1.10; EAR = 1.69) for lung/bronchus cancer after colorectal cancer to 73.9 (95%CI = 58.3-92.3; EAR = 23.3) for anal cancer after Kaposi sarcoma; and in women the SIRs ranged from 1.08 (95%CI = 1.02-1.15; EAR = 0.36) for pancreatic cancer after breast cancer to 19.9 (95%CI = 15.0-26.0; EAR = 39.5) for oral cavity/pharyngeal cancer after laryngeal cancer. For all first primary cancers combined, lung/bronchus cancer comprised the greatest proportion of the total EAR of SPCs, 34.6% in men and 29.1% in women, followed by urinary bladder (11.8%) and oral cavity/pharynx (7.5%) in men and by corpus uterus (12.9%) and colorectum (7.6%) in women. Conclusions: Despite the substantial heterogeneity in the risk of SPCs across the first primary types, only a few cancers comprised a considerable proportion of the total excess risk among survivors. Better understanding of contributing factors to these patterns will inform survivorship care plans and care delivery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document