scholarly journals Full-text publication rate of studies reported as 2013 SoFCOT meeting abstracts

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (8) ◽  
pp. 1447-1452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Erivan ◽  
Julien Dartus ◽  
Nicolas Reina ◽  
Matthieu Ollivier ◽  
Guillaume Villatte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Full Text ◽  
Publication Rate

scholarly journals Publications Rates for Podium and Poster Presentations from the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0004
Author(s):  
Benjamin Williams ◽  
Grace Kunas ◽  
Jonathan Deland ◽  
Scott Ellis
Keyword(s):  
Full Text ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Sports Medicine ◽  
Publication Rate ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Publication Rates ◽  
Ankle Surgery ◽  
Orthopaedic Society ◽  
American Orthopaedic ◽  
Poster Presentations

Category: Other Introduction/Purpose: National orthopaedic meetings are used to disseminate current research. These abstracts are commonly intended to go on to full-text publication in peer-reviewed journals. Several studies have reviewed the abstract to full-text journal publications for orthopaedic society meetings and reported a 34% to 73% publication rate. This has not been studied for the foot and ankle literature. The purpose of this study is to determine the full-text journal publication rates of podium and poster presentations from the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Annual meetings between 2008 and 2012. Methods: All abstracts submitted to and subsequently accepted for podium and poster presentations from the 2008 to 2012 AOFAS annual meetings were compiled from the AOFAS and the published meeting programs. In May 2016, PubMed searches were performed using individual key words in the abstract title with all authors’ names. The results were reviewed for matches to the meeting abstracts with regards to content similarities. Time to full-text publication was recorded. Full-text publication rates for podium and poster presentations were calculated per year. The top journals of publication for podium and poster abstracts were calculated. Continuous data was summarized using mean ± standard deviation and categorical data was summarized using counts and percents. Difference in publication rates between podium and poster presentations was determined by an odds ratio. Results: From 2008 to 2012, 1262 abstracts were submitted to the annual meeting. The overall abstract publication rate was 62.4%: 73.7% for podium abstracts and 55.8% for poster abstracts. Podium presentations were significantly more likely to be published compared to posters (p< 0.0001; odds ratio 2.17, 95% CI, 1.64-2.86). Mean time to publication was 1.53 and 1.37 years for podium and poster presentations, respectively (p=0.124). The three most common journals for published podium abstracts were Foot and Ankle International (FAI) (50.4%), Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (JBJS) (13.0%) and The American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM) (4.3%). For poster abstracts, the three most common journals were: FAI (36.9%), Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (9.4%) and Foot and Ankle Specialist (8.5%). Conclusion: Podium abstracts were over two times more likely to be published compared to poster abstracts. The overall full- text publication rate for the AOFAS was one of the higher reported rates compared to other national orthopaedic society meetings. The significance of the high full-text publication rate is unclear; it may reflect the quality of presented material or commitment to publication by the authors. The top journal for podium and poster abstracts was FAI, indicating the presentations’ specialty-focus.

The Fate of Abstracts Presented at the 2013 and 2014 Annual Meetings of the Romanian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 533-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anca Trifan ◽  
Catalin-Alexandru Chihaia ◽  
Oana Tanase ◽  
Cristina-Maria Lungu ◽  
Carol Stanciu
Keyword(s):  
Full Text ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Publication Rate ◽  
British Society ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Original Research ◽  
New Research ◽  
Poster Presentations ◽  
Study Type ◽  
Oral Presentations

Background: Oral and poster presentations at annual national meetings of the Romanian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (RSGH) provide a forum for education, communication and discussion of new research. However, for the wide-spread dissemination of the new research work, each presentation should be subsequently published as a full-text article in peer-reviewed, indexed journals. Aim: to evaluate the publication rate of full-text articles in peer-reviewed journals after being first presented as abstracts at two consecutive RSGH annual meetings. Methods: A retrospective review of all abstracts presented at the annual meetings in 2013 and 2014 was performed. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched using abstract titles, first author’s name and affiliation, and key words from the title to identify whether an abstract resulted in a peer-reviewed publication. Abstracts published in full-text were subsequently assessed for study type, study center, topics, publication year, journals and their impact factors (IFs). We chose the 2013 and 2014 meetings to ensure a minimum two-year follow-up period since the last meeting for the publication as full-length articles. Results: A total of 562 abstracts were presented (275 in 2013, 287 in 2014). There were 150 oral presentations (93 in 2013, 57 in 2014) and 412 poster presentations (182 in 2013, 230 in 2014). Fifty seven of them (10.1%) were published as full-text articles, among them 26 (17.3%) after oral presentations and 31 (7.5%) after poster presentations (P=0.001). University affiliation and original research work were most likely to be published. The average IFs of the journals which published the articles were 2.42 in 2013 and 1.87 in 2014. Conclusion: The publication rate for the annual RSGH meetings abstracts as full-text articles in peer-reviewed journals is very low compared to the analyses performed in gastroenterology or other medical specialities from other countries. It is not clear yet what are the factors responsible for the failure of publication. Abbreviations: RSGH: Romanian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; JGLD: Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases; IF: impact factor; BSG: British Society of Gastroenterology; DDW: Digestive Diseases Week.

Fate of Poster Abstracts Presented at the 2009 American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Joel B. Durinka ◽  
Jorge Ortiz
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Impact Factor ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
The United States ◽  
Publication Rate ◽  
Official Journal ◽  
American College Of Surgeons ◽  
The Impact

Background: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) holds an annual clinical congress which provides the opportunity to present innovative research to academic and community surgeons from around the globe. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the publication rate of poster abstracts presented at the 2009 American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress to assess the factors influencing publication and determine the impact factor of these journals.Methods: All posters presented at the 2009 ACS were included in the study. A Pubmed-Medline search was performed to identify a matching journal article. Topics, country of origin, study type, study center and publication year were tabulated. Journals and impact factors of publication were noted.Results: Of the 333 poster abstracts presented, 62 (18.6%) were published as full-text articles. Two studies published well in advance of the meeting were removed. 36/60 (60%) of the published studies were from The United States. The average time to publication was 16.8 months. 51/60 (85%) of the studies were conducted in academic institutions. The average impact factor was 2.88. The median impact factor for studies originating from the United States was 3.3 (0.71-4.5). The median impact factor for international studies was 2.38 (0-7.22). This observation did not reach statistical significance (p=0.102) 8 (13.3%) of these manuscripts were published in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons (the official journal of the meeting). There were several abstract characteristics found to be associated with a higher publication rate. A higher rate was found for abstracts for randomized clinical trials, basic science studies, and university programs. The rates did not differ between author specialties.Conclusion:The publication rate for abstracts presented at the 2009 ACS clinical congress was lower than rates from other fields of medicine. Factors leading to failure to publish were non-randomized trials, non-university affiliation and single center studies. Encouraging authors to submit their presentations for full-text publication might improve the rate of publication. Authors should be wary of accepting poster abstracts as dogma; authors should refrain from citing them in publications especially if they are from outside the United States.

scholarly journals Analysis of conference abstract-to-publication rate in UK orthopaedic research

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Collier ◽  
Michelle Roadley-Battin ◽  
Chloe Darlow ◽  
Philip Chant ◽  
Caroline B Hing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Research Design ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Publication Rate ◽  
Annual Conference ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Conference Abstract ◽  
Scientific Meetings ◽  
The Uk

Presentation of research at orthopaedic conferences is an important component for surgical evidence-based practice. However, there remains uncertainty as to how many conference abstracts proceed to achieve full-text publication (FTP) for wider dissemination. This study aimed to determine the abstract-to-publication rate (APR) of research presented in the largest hip and knee orthopaedic meetings in the UK, and to identify predictive factors which influence the APR. All published abstracts (n=744) from the 2006, 2008, 2009 and 2010 British Hip Society (BHS) and the 2007, 2009, 2010 and 2011 British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK) annual conference meetings were examined by four researchers independently. To determine whether abstracts had been published in full-text form, Google Scholar, Medline and EMBASE evidence databases were used to verify FTP status. Variables including sample size, statistical significance, grade of the first author, research affiliated institution and research design were extracted and analysed to identify whether these were associated with FTP. 176 out of 744 abstracts achieved FTP status (APR: 23.7%). Factors associated with FTP status included statistically significant results (P<0.01) and research design (P=0.02). Factors not associated included sample size, grade of the first author and research affiliated institution (P>0.05). APRs of the assessed BHS and BASK annual conference presentations are low in comparison to other scientific meetings. Encouragement should be provided to clinicians and academics to submit their work for publication to address this short fall, thereby enhancing the potential for full-text research publications to inform evidence-based orthopaedics.

scholarly journals Progress in the Full-Text Publication Rate of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy Abstracts Presented at the American Physical Therapy Association's Combined Sections Meeting

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart J. Warden ◽  
Jacquelyn M. Fletcher ◽  
Rick G. Barker ◽  
Elizabeth A. Guildenbecher ◽  
Colleen E. Gorkis-Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Publication Rate ◽  
American Physical

Publication Rate of Abstracts Presented at AAPOS Annual Meetings: From Conference Abstract to Full-Text Article

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Aldo Vagge ◽  
Matilde Roda ◽  
Paolo Nucci ◽  
Gabriele Siccardi ◽  
Marina Agrusta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Full Text ◽  
Publication Rate ◽  
Full Text Article ◽  
Conference Abstract

Publications Rates for Podium and Poster Presentations From the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society: 2008-2012

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 558-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin R. Williams ◽  
Grace C. Kunas ◽  
Jonathan T. Deland ◽  
Scott J. Ellis
Keyword(s):  
Full Text ◽  
Publication Rate ◽  
Journal Publication ◽  
Resource Center ◽  
Publication Rates ◽  
Physician Resource ◽  
The Mean ◽  
American Orthopaedic ◽  
Poster Presentations ◽  
Mean Time

Background: National orthopaedic meetings are used to disseminate current research through podium and poster abstract presentations. Not all of these abstracts go on to full-text journal publication. The purpose of this study was to determine the publication rates of podium and poster presentations from the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) annual meetings between 2008 and 2012. Methods: All accepted podium and poster abstracts from the 2008-2012 AOFAS annual meetings were compiled from the AOFAS office, Physician Resource Center website, and hardcopy meeting programs. PubMed and Google Scholar searches were performed for journal publications using key words in the presentation abstracts and authors’ names. Full-text journal publication rates for the presentations were calculated per year, as were the most common journals of publication. Results: Overall full-text publication rate was 73.7% for podium presentations and 55.8% for posters. Podium presentations were published in a journal significantly more often than posters ( P < .0001; odds ratio 2.17 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.64-2.86]). The mean time to publication was 1.5 and 1.4 years for podium and poster presentations, respectively ( P = .124). The most common journal for podium and poster publications was Foot & Ankle International. Conclusion: Podium abstracts were significantly more likely to be published compared to posters. The AOFAS overall full-text journal publication rate was one of the higher reported rates compared with other national orthopedic society meetings, which have ranged from 34% to 73%.

Publication rate of abstracts from presentations at the British Orthodontic Conference 2009–2014

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-319
Author(s):  
Fai Al-Yatama ◽  
Nikolaos Pandis ◽  
Martyn T Cobourne ◽  
Jadbinder Seehra
Keyword(s):  
Full Text ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Publication Rate ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Study Characteristics ◽  
Correlation Statistics ◽  
Poster Presentations

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the publication rate of scientific abstracts presented at the British Orthodontic Conference 2009–2014. Predictors of full-text publications after presentation of abstracts were explored. Design: Cross-sectional study. Materials and methods: Details of abstracts were retrieved from the conference programmes. Abstracts were screened and full-text publications identified by a single author with discrepancies discussed. Two electronic databases were searched to identify full-text publication of abstracts presented at the British Orthodontic Conference during 2009–2014. Study characteristics were recorded in a prespecified data collection sheet. Descriptive and correlation statistics were calculated. Multivariable Cox regression modelling was implemented in order to assess the effect of predictors on the instance of probability of publication. Results: A total of 225 abstracts (148 poster presentations and 77 oral presentations) were identified. Observational studies were frequent (60%) and significant results were reported in 38.7% of abstracts. The rate of full-text publication after abstract presentation was 46.2% with a mean time to publication of 18.3 ± 18.7 months. Authors based at both university and hospitals (Hazard ratio: 2.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26–5.47, P=0.01) had a higher instant probability of publication compared to university only, whereas diagnostic studies (Hazard ratio: 0.18, 95% CI 0.04–0.74, P=0.02) had lower instant probability of publication compared to systematic reviews. Conclusion: Over 50% of study abstracts presented at the British Orthodontic Conference during 2009–2014 remain unpublished. Author affiliation and study type appear to influence full text publication. In order to reduce publication bias within the literature, publication of full-text articles by authors of presented abstracts is encouraged.

Publication rate as academic productivity?

1980 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 673-673
Author(s):  
Barbara Gerson
Keyword(s):  
Publication Rate ◽  
Academic Productivity
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document