Self-efficacy, risk taking and performance in rock climbing

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Llewellyn ◽  
Xavier Sanchez ◽  
Amanda Asghar ◽  
Gareth Jones
2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandy Marion Boyd Harrison, PhD ◽  
Francis A. McGuire, PhD, CTRS

Perceived self-efficacy is an indicator of maintenance, effort, and performance of various behaviors, including recreation therapy activities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of one of the sources of efficacy information, vicarious experience via modeling, and to enhance efficacy beliefs of at-risk youth who are participating in a therapeutic adventure activity. Additionally, this study investigated the influence of activity specific efficacy perceptions on both self-regulatory self-efficacy (SRSE) and perceived performance in the specific activity. Results indicated that groups who observed a model demonstrate rock climbing during ground school had significantly higher rock climbing self-efficacy and SRSE after their rock climbing experience than the group that did not. In light of this research, it is apparent that providing a model is an effective tool that can be used to assist recreational therapists in offering effective programs.


Author(s):  
Matthew Baugh ◽  
Matthew Ege ◽  
Christopher G. Yust

Using a sample of bank-years from 2005 to 2017, we examine the effect of internal control quality on future risk-taking and performance. We find that banks that disclose a material weakness in internal controls have higher risk-taking and worse performance in the future, including having a higher (lower) likelihood of experiencing large losses (gains). These findings suggest that weak controls increase (reduce) downside (upside) risk-taking or conversely that strong controls increase (reduce) upside (downside) risk-taking. Path analyses suggest that 22.3 to 43.7 percent of the effect of internal control quality on future performance is through risk-taking. Additionally, material weaknesses are negatively associated with total asset, loan, interest income, and non-interest income growth, suggesting that internal control quality affects both core and non-core activities of banks. Overall, results suggest that strong internal controls improve bank risk-taking, in part through asymmetrically reducing downside risk-taking while facilitating upside risk-taking, ultimately improving bank performance.


2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 608-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Merritt ◽  
Ian J. Tharp

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document