scholarly journals Evaluation of Flood Runoff Reduction Effect of LID (Low Impact Development) based on the Decrease in CN: Case Studies from Gimcheon Pyeonghwa District, Korea

2014 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 1531-1538 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sin ◽  
C. Jun ◽  
J.H. Zhu ◽  
C. Yoo
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Low Impact Development ◽  
Runoff Reduction ◽  
Reduction Effect

scholarly journals Modeling the Runoff Reduction Effect of Low Impact Development Installations in an Industrial Area, South Korea

Water ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jungho Kim ◽  
Jungho Lee ◽  
Yangho Song ◽  
Heechan Han ◽  
Jingul Joo
Keyword(s):  
Low Impact Development ◽  
Industrial Area ◽  
Storm Water ◽  
Water Runoff ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Future Design ◽  
Storm Water Runoff ◽  
Runoff Reduction ◽  
Rain Barrels ◽  
Reduction Effect

Low-impact development (LID) methods are an important approach to storm-water mitigation. Modeling the effects of these installations using rainfall-runoff simulations can provide useful data for future design and implementation. In this study, we used the Storm Water Management Model to assess seven types of LID installations (vegetated areas, garden pots, tree filter boxes, permeable pavement, infiltration ditches, rain barrels, and infiltration blocks) at a South Korean industrial site. Using both short- and long-term simulation periods and distinct sub-basins within the study site, we were able to assess LID performance at the combined watershed, as well as at one LID facility. All LID types showed reasonable performance for storm-water runoff reduction, though rain barrels were the least effective. The effect of rainfall runoff reduction on LID facilities is changed according to rainfall depth (annual precipitation, monthly rainfall), the ratio of drainage area and facility capacity. We concluded that SWMM-LID modeling can effectively support the management of LID installations by providing additional design and planning data to better mitigate the effects of storm-water runoff.

Large-Scale Application of Biofiltration Swale Runoff Management Practices

2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Lucas
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Peak Flow ◽  
Low Impact Development ◽  
Urban Runoff ◽  
Management Model ◽  
Check Dams ◽  
Runoff Reduction ◽  
Impervious Area ◽  
Hydrologic Responses

Retaining rainfall where it lands is a fundamental benefit of Low Impact Development (LID). The Delaware Urban Runoff Management Model (DURMM) was developed to address the benefits of LID design. DURMM explicitly addresses the benefits of impervious area disconnection as well as swale flow routing that responds to flow retardance changes. Biofiltration swales are an effective LID BMP for treating urban runoff. By adding check dams, the detention storage provided can also reduce peak rates. This presentation explores how the DURMM runoff reduction approach can be integrated with detention routing procedures to project runoff volume and peak flow reductions provided by BMP facilities. This approach has been applied to a 1,200 unit project on 360 hectares located in Delaware, USA. Over 5 km of biofiltration swales have been designed, many of which have stone check dams placed every 30 to 35 meters to provide detention storage. The engineering involved in the design of such facilities uses hydrologic modeling based upon TR-20 routines, as adapted by the DURMM model. The hydraulic approach includes routing of flows through the check dams. This presentation summarizes the hydrological network, presents the hydrologic responses, along with selected hydrographs to demonstrate the potential of design approach.

scholarly journals Evaluating the performance of low impact development practices in urban runoff mitigation through distributed and combined implementation

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1506-1520
Author(s):  
Sina Samouei ◽  
Mehmet Özger
Keyword(s):  
Low Impact Development ◽  
Drainage System ◽  
Infiltration Rate ◽  
Hydrologic Response ◽  
Impervious Surfaces ◽  
Storm Events ◽  
Rapid Urbanization ◽  
Urban Flood ◽  
Small Catchment ◽  
Runoff Reduction

Abstract Rapid urbanization and increasing impervious surfaces in cities lead to a serious reduction in infiltration rate of the surface and cause challenges in stormwater management. The Low Impact Development (LID) concept is considered as a potential solution for sustainable urban growth by contributing in urban flood mitigation. However, its effects on hydrologic response of the urbanized catchments, especially in broad scale implementation, are not fully understood and practically examined. In this study a hydrologic-hydraulic model of a small catchment was developed in EPA storm water management model (SWMM) program and calibrated and validated through field measurements. The hydrologic response of the catchment was investigated after replacing proportions of impervious surfaces with combinations of LID practices such as green roof, permeable pavement and bio-retention cell, through four land cover conversion scenarios and under five different designed storm events. The simulation results which are derived by comparison of outflow hydrographs between each scenario and conventional drainage system indicated that implementing 5–20% of LIDs has a noticeable impact on runoff peak flow and volume reduction, especially in storm events with shorter return periods. Also the runoff reduction trends show a linear response due to the increase in LID implementation ratio in the study area.

scholarly journals A comparative study on rainfall runoff control indicators of green roof

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 2036-2042
Author(s):  
Ke Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Green Roof ◽  
Reduction Rate ◽  
Green Roofs ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Control Effect ◽  
Runoff Reduction ◽  
Runoff Control ◽  
Reduction Effect

Abstract The rainfall runoff reduction effect on green roofs was analyzed and tested by comparative rainfall runoff monitoring on impermeable roofs (sloping, plane). The evaluation index of rainfall runoff interception benefit (relative runoff reduction rate, rainfall control rate) on green roofs was studied. The results show that compared with sloping and level roofs, the change range of green roof runoff reduction rate relative to level and sloping roofs is 20.0–98.3% and 3.8–92.3%, and the mean value is 48.4% and 34.3% respectively. It is obvious that the green roof has better rainfall runoff reduction effect. It can be seen from the single rainfall control effect that the variation range of green roof rainfall runoff control rate is 36.0% to 99.0%, and the total rainfall control rate is 57.6%, which reflects that the green roof has the better rainfall control effect. Through comparative study, it can be concluded that the rainfall runoff control rate is more suitable for the design index of green roofs.

scholarly journals Assessment of LID practices for restoring pre-development runoff regime in an urbanized catchment in southern Finland

2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (10) ◽  
pp. 1485-1491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingfu Guan ◽  
Nora Sillanpää ◽  
Harri Koivusalo
Keyword(s):  
Low Impact Development ◽  
Urban Runoff ◽  
Flow Conditions ◽  
Runoff Generation ◽  
Flow Rates ◽  
Storm Water Management Model ◽  
Runoff Regime ◽  
Reduction Effect ◽  
Development Levels ◽  
Negative Impacts

This study quantifies the effects of common stormwater management techniques on urban runoff generation. Simulated flow rates for different low impact development (LID) scenarios were compared with observed flow rates during different urban construction phases in a catchment (12.3 ha) that was developed from natural forest to a residential area over a monitoring period of 5 years. The Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) was calibrated and validated against the observed flow rates in the fully developed catchment conditions, and it was then applied to parameterize the LID measures and produce scenarios of their hydrological impacts. The results from the LID scenarios were compared with the observed flow rates in the pre-development and the partially developed catchment conditions. The results show that LID controls reduce urban runoff towards the flow conditions in the partially developed catchment, but the reduction effect diminishes during large rainfall events. The hydrographs with LID are still clearly different from the observed pre-development levels. Although the full restoration of pre-development flow conditions was not feasible, a combination of several measures controlling both volumes and retention times of storm runoff appeared to be effective for managing the stormwater runoff and mitigating the negative impacts of urban development.

scholarly journals A Quantity–Quality Model to Assess the Effects of Source Control Stormwater Management on Hydrology and Water Quality at the Catchment Scale

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Razaq Rezaei ◽  
Zubaidah Ismail ◽  
Mohammad Hossein Niksokhan ◽  
Muhammad Amin Dayarian ◽  
Abu Hanipah Ramli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Best Management Practices ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Low Impact Development ◽  
Real Field ◽  
Rain Garden ◽  
Quality Model ◽  
Catchment Scale ◽  
Runoff Reduction ◽  
Peak Runoff

The vast development of urban areas has resulted in the increase of stormwater peak runoff and volume. Water quality has also been adversely affected. The best management practices (BMPs) and low impact development (LID) techniques could be applied to urban areas to mitigate these effects. A quantity–quality model was developed to simulate LID practices at the catchment scale using the US Environmental Protection Agency Storm Water Management Model (US EPA SWMM). The purpose of the study was to investigate the impacts of LID techniques on hydrology and water quality. The study was performed in BUNUS catchment in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. This study applied vegetated swale and rain garden to assess the model performance at a catchment scale using real field data. The selected LIDs occupied 7% of each subcatchment (of which 40% was swale and 30% was rain garden). The LID removal efficiency was up to 40% and 62% for TN and TSS, respectively. The peak runoff reduction was up to 27% for the rainfall of up to 70 mm, and up to 19% for the rainfall of between 70 and 90 mm, respectively. For the longer storm events of higher than 90 mm the results were not as satisfactory as expected. The model was more effective in peak runoff reduction during the shorter rainfall events. As for the water quality, it was satisfactory in all selected rainfall scenarios.

MODELING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGY: CASE STUDIES USING THE LIFE™ MODEL

2004 ◽  
Vol 2004 (4) ◽  
pp. 524-535
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Medina ◽  
Patrick Graham ◽  
Jared Thorpe ◽  
Avinash Patwardhan ◽  
Timothy Hare
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Low Impact Development
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document