A sustainable process train for a marine microalga-mediated biomass production and CO2 capture: A pilot-scale cultivation of Nannochloropsis salina in open raceway ponds and harvesting through electropreciflocculation

2021 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 263-272
Author(s):  
Natarajan Mohan ◽  
Polur Hanumantha Rao ◽  
Annakkili Baskara Boopathy ◽  
Ramasamy Rengasamy ◽  
Senthil Chinnasamy
Author(s):  
Hetarth B. Patel ◽  
Hitesh A. Solanki

Due to the limited availability of fresh water and the high cost of land for plant culture, microalgae cultivation has attracted significant attention in recent years and has been shown to be the best option for CO2 bio-sequestration. Bio-sequestration of CO2 through algae bioreactors has been hailed as one of the most promising and ecologically benign methods available. This research study was taken up to alleviate certain limitations associated with the technology such as low CO2 sequestration efficiency and low biomass yields. In this study three distinct cyanobacterial strains, Chlorella sp., Synechococcus sp., and Spirulina sp., were tested in 10 litre raceway ponds for their capacity for CO2 bioconversion and high biomass production under various CO2 concentrations at different EC. The highest growth rate of all tested cyanobacterial strains was observed during the first 4 days of cultivation under CO2 5% to 10%. Additionally, all these cyanobacterial strains were explored for their bioremediation capabilities. The results showed that the Chlorella sp., Synechococcus sp., and Spirulina sp. were able to remove COD of the wastewater by 56%, 48% and 77% respectively and the BOD removal efficiency was 48%, 30% and 52% respectively. The primary results indicated that the Spirulina sp. was to be the best cynobacteria studied in terms of biomass production, CO2 bioconversion, and bioremediation capacities. Therefore, the Spirulina sp. was further scaled up in 1500 litre raceway pond for CO2 bio-sequestration and biomass production. The biomass collected was utilised to extract biomolecules such as protein, carbohydrate and lipids.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Schöny ◽  
Johannes Fuchs ◽  
Melina Infantino ◽  
Sander Van Paasen ◽  
Jolinde van de Graaf ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 105945
Author(s):  
Clemens Herold ◽  
Tasneema Ishika ◽  
Emeka G. Nwoba ◽  
Stephan Tait ◽  
Andrew Ward ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 256-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashleigh Cousins ◽  
Paul T. Nielsen ◽  
Sanger Huang ◽  
Rob Rowland ◽  
Bill Edwards ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Morgan ◽  
Benjamin Omell ◽  
Michael Matuszewski ◽  
David Miller ◽  
Muhammad Ismail Shah ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (16) ◽  
pp. 4792-4803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Li ◽  
James Landon ◽  
Bradley Irvin ◽  
Liangfu Zheng ◽  
Keith Ruh ◽  
...  

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 5692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta G. Plaza ◽  
Sergio Martínez ◽  
Fernando Rubiera

The implementation of carbon capture, use, and storage in the cement industry is a necessity, not an option, if the climate targets are to be met. Although no capture technology has reached commercial scale demonstration in the cement sector yet, much progress has been made in the last decade. This work intends to provide a general overview of the CO2 capture technologies that have been evaluated so far in the cement industry at the pilot scale, and also about the current plans for future commercial demonstration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document