A comparison of accelerometer cut-points for measuring physical activity and sedentary time in adolescents with Down syndrome

2022 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 104126
Author(s):  
Bethany Forseth ◽  
Jordan A. Carlson ◽  
Erik A. Willis ◽  
Brian C. Helsel ◽  
Lauren T. Ptomey
2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (7S) ◽  
pp. 408-408
Author(s):  
Natalie L. King ◽  
Amber G. Cook ◽  
Supreete Gosh ◽  
Poram Choi ◽  
Stamatis Agiovlasitis

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 3326
Author(s):  
Jairo H. Migueles ◽  
Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez ◽  
Juan M. A. Alcantara ◽  
Javier Leal-Martín ◽  
Asier Mañas ◽  
...  

Accelerometers’ accuracy for sedentary time (ST) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) classification depends on accelerometer placement, data processing, activities, and sample characteristics. As intensities differ by age, this study sought to determine intensity cut-points at various wear locations people more than 70 years old. Data from 59 older adults were used for calibration and from 21 independent participants for cross-validation purposes. Participants wore accelerometers on their hip and wrists while performing activities and having their energy expenditure measured with portable calorimetry. ST and MVPA were defined as ≤1.5 metabolic equivalents (METs) and ≥3 METs (1 MET = 2.8 mL/kg/min), respectively. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses showed fair-to-good accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.62–0.89). ST cut-points were 7 mg (cross-validation: sensitivity = 0.88, specificity = 0.80) and 1 count/5 s (cross-validation: sensitivity = 0.91, specificity = 0.96) for the hip; 18 mg (cross-validation: sensitivity = 0.86, specificity = 0.86) and 102 counts/5 s (cross-validation: sensitivity = 0.91, specificity = 0.92) for the non-dominant wrist; and 22 mg and 175 counts/5 s (not cross-validated) for the dominant wrist. MVPA cut-points were 14 mg (cross-validation: sensitivity = 0.70, specificity = 0.99) and 54 count/5 s (cross-validation: sensitivity = 1.00, specificity = 0.96) for the hip; 60 mg (cross-validation: sensitivity = 0.83, specificity = 0.99) and 182 counts/5 s (cross-validation: sensitivity = 1.00, specificity = 0.89) for the non-dominant wrist; and 64 mg and 268 counts/5 s (not cross-validated) for the dominant wrist. These cut-points can classify ST and MVPA in older adults from hip- and wrist-worn accelerometers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 109 (9) ◽  
pp. 1825-1830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Duncan ◽  
Emma L. J. Eyre ◽  
Val Cox ◽  
Clare M. P. Roscoe ◽  
Mark A. Faghy ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liane S. Lewis ◽  
James Hernon ◽  
Allan Clark ◽  
John M. Saxton

The present study investigated the convergent validity of an interview-administered IPAQ long version (IPAQ-L) in an older population by comparison with objective accelerometry movement data. Data from 52 participants (mean age 67.9 years, 62% male) were included in the analysis. Treadmill derived (TM-ACC: 1,952–5,724 cpm) and free-living physical activity (PA) derived (FL-ACC: 760–5,724 cpm) accelerometer cut-points were used as criterion. IPAQ-L measures (total PA, leisure-time, walking-time, sedentary time) were significantly correlated with accelerometry (P ≤ .05). Differences in sex were observed. Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement analysis showed that the IPAQ-L overestimated PA in relation to accelerometry. Our results show that an interview-administered IPAQ-L shows low to moderate convergent validity with objective PA measures in this population but there may be differences between males and females which should be further investigated.


2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S197-S198
Author(s):  
Cheryl B. Anderson ◽  
Maria Hagstromer ◽  
Agneta Yngve ◽  
Deborah I. Thompson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document