scholarly journals Swallowing function and chronic respiratory diseases: Systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 54-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ines Ghannouchi ◽  
Renée Speyer ◽  
Kenji Doma ◽  
Reinie Cordier ◽  
Eric Verin
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Swallowing Function ◽  
Chronic Respiratory Diseases

scholarly journals Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Respiratory Diseases—Results of a Systematic Review

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simin Li ◽  
Wanchen Ning ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Dirk Ziebolz ◽  
Aneesha Acharya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Respiratory Disease ◽  
Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Chronic Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Background: This systematic review evaluates the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients with chronic respiratory diseases.Methods: A systematic literature search was performed based on the PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus, using the search terms: “oral health-related quality of life” and “respiratory disease” or “lung” and “oral health-related quality of life.” Full-text articles published until June 30, 2021 and reporting any OHRQoL measurement in children or adults with a chronic respiratory disease or condition were included and analyzed qualitatively.Results: A total of seven out of 44 studies were included, of which four studies examined adults and three studies investigated children. The respective diseases were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n = 2), sleep apnea (n = 2), severe asthma (n = 1), cystic fibrosis (n = 1), and lung transplantation (n = 1). Four studies confirmed a worse OHRQoL in the respiratory diseased group compared to healthy controls. The overall OHRQoL was reduced in the included studies. Oral health, health-related quality of life, and disease-related parameters were rarely examined with regard to OHRQoL.Conclusion: Patients with chronic respiratory diseases show a reduced OHRQoL. Oral health should be fostered in these individuals to support their OHRQoL.

Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents With Chronic Respiratory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-229
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Torres-Castro ◽  
Luis Vasconcello-Castillo ◽  
Roberto Acosta-Dighero ◽  
Nicolás Sepúlveda-Cáceres ◽  
Marisol Barros-Poblete ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Sedentary Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Slight Reduction ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Chronic Respiratory Diseases

Background: The literature is unclear as to whether children and adolescents with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) differ from their healthy peers in physical activity (PA). Objective: To determine the PA levels measured through accelerometers in children and adolescents with CRDs. Methods: The authors conducted a systematic review using five databases. The authors included studies that assessed the PA measured by accelerometers in children and adolescents with CRDs. Two independent reviewers analyzed the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of evidence. Results: From 11,497 reports returned by the initial search, 29 articles reporting on 4381 patients were included. In the sensitivity analysis, the authors found that children and adolescents with CRDs had a moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) of −0.08 hours per day (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.12 to −0.03 h/d; P = .001), which was lower than the healthy controls; the values for sedentary time (mean difference −0.47 h/d; 95% CI, −1.29 to 0.36 h/d; P = .27) and steps/d (mean difference 361 steps/d; 95% CI −385 to 1707 steps/d; P = .45) were similar for both. Conclusion: Children and adolescents with CRDs have a slight reduction in MVPA in comparison with healthy controls, but sedentary time and steps/d were similar for both.

scholarly journals Non-Communicable Diseases-Related Stigma: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (18) ◽  
pp. 6657
Author(s):  
Sarju Sing Rai ◽  
Elena V. Syurina ◽  
Ruth M. H. Peters ◽  
Annisa Ika Putri ◽  
Marjolein B. M. Zweekhorst
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiovascular Diseases ◽  
Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Health Management ◽  
Communicable Diseases ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Non Communicable Diseases ◽  
Chronic Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Related Stigma ◽  
Health Related

This systematic review examines and consolidates existing evidence on stigma associated with the top four non-communicable diseases (NCDs)—cancers, cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes—and its impact on the lives of people affected. We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, PsycINFO, JSTOR, Science Direct, and Web of Science for original research in English that explored health-related stigma among people living with either of the four NCDs. A three-step integrative synthesis of data was conducted. Twenty-six articles (qualitative = 15; quantitative = 11) were selected, with most (n = 15) related to cancers, followed by diabetes (n = 7), chronic respiratory diseases (n = 3), and cardiovascular diseases (n = 1). Blame, shame, and fear were the main causes of stigma, the origin and nature of which differed according to the disease-specific features. The manifestations (enacted and felt stigma) and consequences (social, behavioral, psychological, and medical) of stigma across NCDs were similar. Inconsistencies existed in the conceptualization of stigma processes. To fill this gap, we developed an NCD-related stigma framework. People living with NCDs can experience stigma, which can negatively impact their health, management of their disease, and quality of life. The new framework can help in improving the understanding of the processes and experiences of stigma related to NCDs.

Functional performance in non-COPD chronic respiratory diseases: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camile Zamboti ◽  
Thatielle Garcia ◽  
Larissa Dragoneti Bertin ◽  
Gabriela Garcia Krinski ◽  
Heloise Angelico Pimpão ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Functional Performance ◽  
Chronic Respiratory Diseases

scholarly journals Advance care planning for patients with chronic respiratory diseases: a systematic review of preferences and practices

Thorax ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea J Jabbarian ◽  
Marieke Zwakman ◽  
Agnes van der Heide ◽  
Marijke C Kars ◽  
Daisy J A Janssen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Respiratory Disease ◽  
Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Complex Disease ◽  
Trigger Points ◽  
Chronic Respiratory Disease ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Chronic Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Advance Care

BackgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) supports patients in identifying and documenting their preferences and timely discussing them with their relatives and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Since the British Thoracic Society encourages ACP in chronic respiratory disease, the objective was to systematically review ACP practice in chronic respiratory disease, attitudes of patients and HCPs and barriers and facilitators related to engagement in ACP.MethodsWe systematically searched 12 electronic databases for empirical studies on ACP in adults with chronic respiratory diseases. Identified studies underwent full review and data extraction.ResultsOf 2509 studies, 21 were eligible: 10 were quantitative studies. Although a majority of patients was interested in engaging in ACP, ACP was rarely carried out. Many HCPs acknowledged the importance of ACP but were hesitant to initiate it. Barriers to engagement in ACP were the complex disease course of patients with chronic respiratory diseases, HCPs’ concern of taking away patients’ hopes and lack of continuity of care. The identification of trigger points and training of HCPs on how to communicate sensitive topics were identified as facilitators to engagement in ACP.ConclusionsIn conclusion, ACP is surprisingly uncommon in chronic respiratory disease, possibly due to the complex disease course of chronic respiratory diseases and ambivalence of both patients and HCPs to engage in ACP. Providing patients with information about their disease can help meeting their needs. Additionally, support of HCPs through identification of trigger points, training and system-related changes can facilitate engagement in ACP.Systematic review registration numberCRD42016039787.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Severity and Death in COVID-19 Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Pengqiang Du ◽  
Dandan Li ◽  
Aifeng Wang ◽  
Su Shen ◽  
Zhichao Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Advanced Age ◽  
Severe Illness ◽  
Chronic Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Comprehensive Search

This meta-analysis aims to screen the risk factors for severe illness and death and provide help for early clinical treatment of the new coronavirus (COVID-19). Based on a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, we included studies that explored the cause and risk factors for severe illness and death in COVID-19 patients. We evaluated the strength of this relationship using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 17 articles were included; 16 of the 17 articles were from China, and the risk factors associated with severe illness and death were age, sex, and multiple comorbidities. Advanced age (≥65 years, severe illness, OR = 2.62; death, OR = 6.00), male (severe illness, OR = 1.49; death, OR = 1.54), chronic respiratory diseases (severe illness, OR = 5.67; death, OR = 3.72), diabetes (severe illness, OR = 3.27; death, OR = 2.60), hypertension (severe illness, OR = 3.08; death, OR = 3.53), chronic kidney disease (severe illness, OR = 3.59; death, OR = 5.38), and cardiovascular diseases (severe illness, OR = 3.87; death, OR = 4.91) were all risk factors. For COVID-19 patients, advanced age, male, and patients with chronic disease are at higher risk of developing severe illness or even death.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document