scholarly journals Insight into greenhouse gases emissions from the two popular treatment technologies in municipal wastewater treatment processes

2019 ◽  
Vol 671 ◽  
pp. 1302-1313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thi Kieu Loan Nguyen ◽  
Huu Hao Ngo ◽  
Wenshan Guo ◽  
Soon Woong Chang ◽  
Dinh Duc Nguyen ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 685-692
Author(s):  
Elisabeta Chirila ◽  
Ionela Carazeanu Popovici ◽  
Techin Ibadula ◽  
Alice Iordache

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 926-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adalberto Noyola ◽  
Alejandro Padilla-Rivera ◽  
Juan Manuel Morgan-Sagastume ◽  
Leonor Patricia Güereca ◽  
Flor Hernández-Padilla

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1208-1209
Author(s):  
Adalberto Noyola ◽  
Alejandro Padilla-Rivera ◽  
Juan Manuel Morgan-Sagastume ◽  
Leonor Patricia Güereca ◽  
Flor Hernández-Padilla

2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (7) ◽  
pp. 1179-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Martin Ruel ◽  
J.-M. Choubert ◽  
H. Budzinski ◽  
C. Miège ◽  
M. Esperanza ◽  
...  

The next challenge of wastewater treatment is to reliably remove micropollutants at the microgram per litre range. During the present work more than 100 substances were analysed through on-site mass balances over 19 municipal wastewater treatment lines. The most relevant substances according to their occurrence in raw wastewater, in treated wastewater and in sludge were identified, and their fate in wastewater treatment processes was assessed. About half of priority substances of WFD were found at concentrations higher than 0.1 μg/L in wastewater. For 26 substances, potential non-compliance with Environmental Quality Standard of Water Framework Directive has been identified in treated wastewater, depending on river flow. Main concerns are for Cd, DEHP, diuron, alkylphenols, and chloroform. Emerging substances of particular concern are by-products, organic chemicals (e.g. triclosan, benzothiazole) and pharmaceuticals (e.g. ketoprofen, diclofenac, sulfamethoxazole, carbamazepine). About 80% of the load of micropollutants was removed by conventional activated sludge plants, but about two-thirds of removed substances were mainly transferred to sludge.


2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ried ◽  
J. Mielcke

The use of ozone and/or UV for water treatment processes is often a combination of an ozone and/or UV-step with additional treatment steps, e.g. biological treatment, flocculation, filtration and activated carbon. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an optimized combination of these different steps. This article will demonstrate the advantages presenting two examples for drinking water treatment and two examples for municipal wastewater treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document