The medical practice of patient autonomy and cancer treatment refusals: a patients’ and physicians’ perspective

2004 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 2325-2336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Titia van Kleffens ◽  
Berna van Baarsen ◽  
Evert van Leeuwen
2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 791-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Lombardo

Over the past thirty years, the doctrine of informed consent has become a focal point in discussions of medical ethics. The literature of informed consent explores the evolution of the principle of autonomy, purportedly emerging from the mists of 19th Century medical practice, and finding its earliest articulation in legal cases where wronged citizens asserted their rights against medical authority. A commonplace, if not obligatory, feature of that literature is a reference to the case of Mary Schloendorff and the opinion written by Judge Benjamin Cardozo by which the case is remembered. Commentators today applaud the prescience of Cardozo for an early articulation of what eventually would become bioethical orthodoxy concerning informed consent and its place as a bulwark of patient autonomy. They inevitably quote Cardozo's famous statement, “Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body.”


1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-245
Author(s):  
Hazel Biggs

The advent of advanced medical technology and its ability to prolong living and dying has, together with greater patient autonomy, inspired increasing awareness of euthanasia and assisted death. Doctors confronted by distressed patients seeking treatments, which may be construed as euthanasia, can experience a profound moral dilemma that emanates from the conflict between their ethical duty to relieve suffering, and the responsibilities imposed upon them by the law. Respect for individual autonomy is central to modem medical practice; but the absolute endorsement of the patient’s right to autonomy at the end of life may compromise the clinician’s professional and ethical integrity. This paper details the uneasy equilibrium between the rights of patients and the responsibilities of doctors at the end of life.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn A Martinez ◽  
Allison W Kurian ◽  
Sarah T Hawley ◽  
Reshma Jagsi

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 1615-1620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Cook ◽  
Constantine D. Mavroudis ◽  
Jeffrey P. Jacobs ◽  
Constantine Mavroudis

AbstractRespect for patient autonomy is an important and indispensable principle in the ethical practice of clinical medicine. Legal tenets recognise the centrality of this principle and the inherent right of patients of sound mind – properly informed – to make their own personal medical decisions. In the course of everyday medical practice, however, challenging cases may result in ethical dilemmas for the patient, the physician, and society. Resolution of these dilemmas requires a thorough understanding of the underlying principles that allow the clinician to make informed decisions and to offer considered therapeutic options to the patient. We argue in this paper that there is also need for a transition of moral competency from understanding principles to attaining virtue in the classic Aristotelian tradition. Achieving moral virtue is based on a lifetime of learning, practising, and watching how others, who have achieved virtue, act and perform their duties. We further claim that learning moral virtue in medical practice is best realised by incorporating the lessons learnt during daily rounds where frank discussions and considered resolutions can occur under the leadership of senior practitioners who have achieved a semblance of moral excellence.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
VILHJÁLMUR ÁRNASON ◽  
STEFÁN HJÖRLEIFSSON

Abstract:In this article, we discuss the ideas of Eric J. Cassell about the patient-professional relationship. We argue that his approach combines in an interesting way features from the literature on patient autonomy and paternalistic practices. We suggest that these seemingly paternalistic features of practicing medicine, which are widely either ignored or condemned in bioethical discussion, are of vital significance in medical practice. In the first sections of the article, we describe the main features of Cassell’s understanding of the sick person and his version of personalized medicine. We pay particular attention to his notion of information control and compare his ideas about conversation with patients to Hans-Georg Gadamer’s analysis of patient-professional dialogue. In the latter part of the article, we explore through a couple of examples the implications these ideas have for medical practice.


1998 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Oddie

If a person is suffering from some illness or disability and wishes to end their We the lawought to facilitate rather than frustrate that choice argues Graham Oddie in this article. Hepoints out the inconsistencies in current medical practice, and the gross disparity between the practice and the letter of the law. In dismissing many of the commonly raised objections to calls for reform of the law permitting euthanasia he makes a strong case for consistency in our approach to the right to die and patient autonomy.


Author(s):  
Michael Dunn ◽  
Tony Hope

Euthanasia is one form of assisted dying. Other forms include assisting suicide and the withholding or withdrawing of life-extending medical treatment. The practice of euthanasia—killing a patient for the patient’s benefit—under some circumstances, is morally required by the two most widely regarded principles for guiding good medical practice: respect for patient autonomy and promoting patients’ best interests. ‘Assisted dying: good medical practice, or murder?’ considers four tools of ethical reasoning: defining terms, elucidating concepts, case comparison, and logic. It argues in favour of the law allowing health professionals, under certain conditions, to assist patients to die, and illustrates one common and powerful method of argument: countering the counter-arguments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document