scholarly journals The changing nature of work – Job strain, job support and sickness absence among care workers and in other occupations in Sweden 1991–2013

2021 ◽  
pp. 100893
Author(s):  
Gunnar Aronsson ◽  
Staffan Marklund ◽  
Constanze Leineweber ◽  
Magnus Helgesson
2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulla Peterson ◽  
Evangelia Demerouti ◽  
Gunnar Bergström ◽  
Marie Åsberg ◽  
Åke Nygren

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e96025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Jung Wang ◽  
Arnstein Mykletun ◽  
Ellen Ihlen Møyner ◽  
Simon Øverland ◽  
Max Henderson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 593-601
Author(s):  
B Gohar ◽  
M Larivière ◽  
N Lightfoot ◽  
E Wenghofer ◽  
C Larivière ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Nursing is a stressful occupation with high rates of sickness absence. To date, there are no meta-analyses that statistically determined the correlates of sickness absence in this population. Aims This meta-analysis examined organizational and psychosocial predictors of sickness absence among nursing staff. Methods As a registered systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42017071040), which followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, five databases (CINAHL, PROQuest Allied, PROQuest database theses, PsycINFO, PubMed) were reviewed to examine predictors of sickness absence in nurses and nursing assistants between 1990 and 2019. The Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome tool was used to support our searches. Effect sizes were analysed using random-effects model. Results Following critical appraisals using (i) National Institutes of Health’s Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies and (ii) Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology, 21 studies were included. Nursing assistants had greater odds of sickness absence than nurses. Working night shifts, in paediatrics or psychiatric units, experiencing poor mental health, and fatigue, also increased the odds of sickness absence. There was no evidence that job satisfaction or job strain influenced sickness absence; however, job demand increased the likelihood. Finally, work support reduced the odds of lost-time. Conclusions We synthesized three decades of research where several factors influenced sickness absence. Due to limited recent research, the results should be interpreted with caution as some practices may have changed overtime or between countries. Nevertheless, these findings could help in applying preventative strategies to mitigate lost-time in a vulnerable working population.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 666-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotte Nygaard Andersen ◽  
Birgit Juul-Kristensen ◽  
Kirsten Kaya Roessler ◽  
Lene Gram Herborg ◽  
Thomas Lund Sørensen ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 265-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rik Verhaeghe ◽  
Rudolf Mak ◽  
Georges Van Maele ◽  
Marcel Kornitzer ◽  
Guy De Backer

Author(s):  
G. Aronsson ◽  
J. Hagberg ◽  
C. Björklund ◽  
E. Aboagye ◽  
S. Marklund ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The first objective was to contribute to a better understanding of the contrasting and paradoxical results in studies of work environment factors and sickness presence and sickness absence. A second objective was to examine if, and under what conditions, employees choose to replace sickness absence with sickness presence, i.e., so-called substitution. Methods The study utilizes a large body of cross-sectional questionnaire data (n = 130,161) gathered in Sweden from 2002 to 2007 in connection with a comprehensive health promotion initiative. Health and motivation were analyzed as mediators of the effects of five job factors, job control, job support, job demand, role conflict and “work to family conflict” on sickness presence and absence. Results The results concerning job demands indicate substitution in that increased job demands are associated with increased presenteeism and reduced absenteeism. The direct effect of higher job support was increased absenteeism, but via the health and motivation paths, the total effect of more social support was health-promoting and associated with a reduction in sickness absence and sickness presence. High job control emerged as the most pronounced health-promoting factor, reducing sickness presenteeism as well as absenteeism. More role conflicts and work-to-family conflicts were directly and indirectly associated with decreased health and increased absenteeism as well as presenteeism. earlier research. Conclusion The mediation analyzes shed light on some of the paradoxes in research on sickness presenteeism and sickness absenteeism, especially regarding job demands and job support. The substitution effect is important for workplace policy and occupational health practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (04) ◽  
pp. 399-406
Author(s):  
Larissa Garcia de Paiva ◽  
Graziele de Lima Dalmolin ◽  
Wendel Mombaque dos Santos

2020 ◽  
pp. 267-290
Author(s):  
LJB Hayes

This chapter offers a critique of the ‘care worker offence’ in section 20 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015, which criminalizes ill-treatment or wilful neglect in circumstances of ‘paid work’ by care workers. It argues that this new offence has obscured the political and managerial choices that render care work badly paid and precarious. Judicial narratives are all too often framed around thick moralized judgements of vice and bad character, marginalizing alternative narratives that identify the terrible pressures that precarious workers experience in their working lives. These pressures are being generated by poor management, underinvestment in training, high staff turnover and high rates of sickness absence, and chronic starvation of public resources for social care. In this way, this chapter suggests that we might even regard the section 20 offence as a contemporary variant of 19th-century master and servant laws, using criminal laws to enforce labour discipline and to police the precarious.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document