At the Interface of Fibrinolysis and Inflammation: The Role of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator in the Leukocyte Extravasation Cascade

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 192-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph A. Reichel ◽  
Sandip M. Kanse ◽  
Fritz Krombach
1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (04) ◽  
pp. 710-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marieke E van der Kaaden ◽  
Dingeman C Rijken ◽  
J Kar Kruijt ◽  
Theo J C van Berkel ◽  
Johan Kuiper

SummaryUrokinase-type plasminogen activator (u-PA) is used as a thrombolytic agent in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. In vitro, recombinant single-chain u-PA (rscu-PA) expressed in E.coli is recognized by the Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-related Protein (LRP) on rat parenchymal liver cells. In this study we investigated the role of LRP in the liver uptake and plasma clearance of rscu-PA in rats. A preinjection of the LRP inhibitor GST-RAP reduced the maximal liver uptake of 125I-rscu-PA at 5 min after injection from 50 to 30% of the injected dose and decreased the clearance of rscu-PA from 2.37 ml/min to 1.58 ml/min. Parenchymal, Kupffer and endothelial cells were responsible for 40, 50 and 10% of the liver uptake, respectively. The reduction in liver uptake of rscu-PA by the preinjection of GST-RAP was caused by a 91 % and 62% reduction in the uptake by parenchymal and Kupffer cells, respectively. In order to investigate the part of rscu-PA that accounted for the interaction with LRP, experiments were performed with a mutant of rscu-PA lacking residues 11-135 (= deltal25- rscu-PA). Deletion of residues 11-135 resulted in a 80% reduction in liver uptake and a 2.4 times slower clearance (0.97 ml/min). The parenchymal, Kupffer and endothelial cells were responsible for respectively 60, 33 and 7% of the liver uptake of 125I-deltal25-rscu-PA. Preinjection of GST-RAP completely reduced the liver uptake of delta 125-rscu-PA and reduced its clearance to 0.79 ml/min. Treatment of isolated Kupffer cells with PI-PLC reduced the binding of rscu-PA by 40%, suggesting the involvement of the urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (u-PAR) in the recognition of rscu-PA. Our results demonstrate that in vivo LRP is responsible for more than 90% of the parenchymal liver cell mediated uptake of rscu-PA and for 60% of the Kupffer cell interaction. It is also suggested that u-PAR is involved in the Kupffer cell recognition of rscu-PA.


2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (12) ◽  
pp. 1124-1132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Matsuno ◽  
Eri Kawashita ◽  
Kiyotaka Okada ◽  
Hidetaka Suga ◽  
Shigeru Ueshima ◽  
...  

SummaryUrokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) plays a role in cellular responses which include cellular adhesion, differentiation, proliferation and migration. The aim of this study was to clarify the role of uPAR on the development of adipose tissue. To clarify the role of uPAR on adipogenesis, we examined the effect of uPAR overexpression and uPAR deficiency on the adipocyte differentiation. Adipocyte differentiation was induced by incubation of 3T3-L1 cells with differentiation media containing insulin, dexamethasone, and 1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthin. uPAR overexpression by transfection of uPAR expression vector induced adipocyte differentiation. In addition, we examined the difference in adipocyte differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from wild-type mice and uPAR knockout (uPAR-/-) mice. The uPAR deficiency attenuated differentiation media-induced adipocyte differentiation. Moreover, we found that the inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway attenuated uPAR overexpression-induced adipocyte differentiation, and uPAR overexpression induced the activation of Akt. We also found that an increase of the adipose tissue mass in uPAR-/- mice was less than that observed in wild-type mice. The present results suggest that uPAR plays a pivotal role in the development of adipose tissue through PI3K/Akt pathway.


2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (02) ◽  
pp. 306-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.E. Morange ◽  
D. Bastelica ◽  
M.F. Bonzi ◽  
B. Van Hoef ◽  
D. Collen ◽  
...  

SummaryTo investigate the potential role of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) or urokinase-type plasminogen activator (u-PA) in development of adipose tissue, we have used a nutritionally induced obesity model in t-PA (t-PA−/−) and u-PA (u-PA−/−) deficient mice. Five week old male wild-type (WT), t-PA−/− or u-PA−/− mice (n = 9 to 16) were fed a high fat diet (HFD, 42% fat). After 16 weeks of HFD, the body weight of t-PA−/− mice was significantly higher than that of WT mice (48 ± 1.1 g vs. 39 ± 2.2 g, p = 0.004). The total weight of the isolated subcutaneous (sc) fat deposit was higher in t-PA−/− than in WT mice (2.4 ± 0.22 g vs. 1.2 ± 0.29 g, p = 0.002), accompanied with higher adipocyte diameters (80 ± 1.7 µm vs. 61 ± 4.7 µm, p < 0.01). These differences were not observed in the intra-abdominal fat deposit. The number of stroma cells in both adipose tissue territories was increased in t-PA−/− as compared to WT mice (2.0 ± 0.13 vs. 1.5 ± 0.10 p = 0.02 and 3.0 ± 0.17 vs 1.6 ± 0.17, p = 0.0001, stroma cells/ adipocytes in sc and intra-abdominal tissue, respectively), partly as a result of an increased number of endothelial cells (192 ± 9 vs. 154 ± 18 p = 0.06 and 108 ± 13 vs. 69 ± 8 p = 0.04 CD31 stained/adipocyte area). In contrast the weight gain and adipose tissue development in u-PA−/− mice was not different from that in WT mice. These data suggest that t-PA but not u-PA plays a role in adipose tissue development.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2236-2236
Author(s):  
Rocco Romagnuolo ◽  
Michael B Boffa ◽  
Marlys L Koschinsky

Abstract Abstract 2236 Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been identified as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases such as coronary heart disease. Lp(a) levels vary over 1000-fold within the human population and Lp(a) possesses both proatherogenic and prothrombotic properties due to the LDL-like moiety and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] components, respectively. Apo(a) is highly homologous to plasminogen and thus can potentially interfere with plasminogen activation. Plasmin generated in the context of fibrin mediates the breakdown of blood clots, which are the causative factors in heart attacks and strokes. Plasmin generated on the surface of vascular cells plays a role in cell migration and proliferation, two of the fibroproliferative inflammatory events that underlie atherosclerosis. Previous studies have suggested that apo(a) may inhibit pericellular plasminogen activation on the basis of observations that apo(a) decreases plasminogen binding to cells. We have undertaken analysis of the mechanism by which apo(a) may interfere with pericellular plasminogen activation to allow for a more definitive description of the role of Lp(a) within the vasculature. Plasminogen activation was found to be markedly inhibited by the recombinant apo(a) variant 17K, in a dose dependent manner, on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), human monocytic leukemia cells (THP-1), THP-1 macrophages, and smooth muscle cells. The strong lysine binding site in kringle IV type 10, as well as kringle V appear to be required for this effect since apo(a) variants lacking these elements (17KΔAsp and 17KΔV, respectively) failed to inhibit activation. However, the role of lysine-dependent binding of apo(a) itself to the cells is not clear. Carboxypeptidase treatment of cells did not decrease apo(a) binding, and apo(a) does not compete directly for plasminogen binding to the cells. Rather, apo(a) and plasminogen may bind to the cells as a complex. We next attempted to identify the cell-surface receptor(s) that mediate plasminogen activation on the cell surface as well as its inhibition by apo(a). Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) has been previously shown to bind to urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), vitronectin, and β3 integrins. uPAR is involved in the remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM) through regulation of plasminogen activation. We found evidence that uPAR is a potential receptor for both plasminogen and apo(a). Knockdown of uPAR in HUVECs results in decreased binding of plasminogen, 17K and, to a lesser extent, 17KΔAsp and 17KΔV. Similar experiments in SMCs revealed no changes in binding. A decrease in tPA-mediated plasminogen activation following uPAR knockdown occurred in HUVECs, and addition of 17K did not result in any further decrease. Overexpression of uPAR in THP-1 macrophages leads to greater than a two fold increase in 17K and plasminogen binding. Plasminogen activation increases over two-fold as a result of overexpression of uPAR, while 17K blunts the effect of uPAR overexpression. These results indicate that uPAR plays a crucial role in both plasminogen and apo(a) binding to the cell surface of specific cells and inhibition by apo(a) of plasminogen activation. Macrophage-1-antigen (Mac-1) receptor consists of CD11b (αM) and CD18 (β2) integrin and has been previously shown to recognize uPA and control migration and adhesion. Furthermore, αVβ3 has been previously shown to bind to vitronectin and the uPA-uPAR complex which promotes cell adhesion through binding of both vitronectin and αVβ3 integrins. We found that blocking the αM, β2, or αVβ3 receptors with monoclonal antibodies in THP-1 cells leads to a decrease in plasminogen activation, as well as a blunting of the inhibitory effects of apo(a) on plasminogen activation. These results indicate a role for Mac-1 and αVβ3 in apo(a) binding and inhibition of plasminogen activation. In conclusion, we have demonstrated, for the first time, the role of specific receptors in binding of apo(a) to vascular cell surfaces and in mediating the inhibitory effect of apo(a) on pericellular plasminogen activation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (9) ◽  
pp. 1394-1395
Author(s):  
Shih-Hon Li ◽  
Daniel A. Lawrence

In this issue of Blood, Connolly and colleagues describe an elegant approach to studying the significance of specific molecular interactions in vivo. The authors have “knocked-in” a mutant form of the protease, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), into the murine uPA locus, to create a mouse strain (PlauGFDhu/GFDhu) where the interaction between endogenous uPA and its receptor (uPAR) is selectively disrupted, while leaving other functions of both uPA and uPAR intact. Their findings suggest that the primary role of uPAR in vivo is to promote fibrinolysis within tissues through localization of uPA, and that many of the previously described activities of uPAR may be secondary to this process.1


1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjeeva Mohanam ◽  
Raymond E. Sawaya ◽  
Masaaki Yamamoto ◽  
Janet M. Bruner ◽  
Garth L. Nicholson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document