Hormonal mechanisms regulating follicular wave dynamics I: Comparison of follicle growth profiles under different physiological conditions in heifers

2019 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 194-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.E. Gomez-León ◽  
O.J. Ginther ◽  
E.R. Araujo ◽  
J.D. Guimarães ◽  
M.C. Wiltbank
1994 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 1555-1569 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.A. Bo ◽  
G.P. Adams ◽  
R.A. Pierson ◽  
H.E. Tribulo ◽  
M. Caccia ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-142
Author(s):  
T. Fukuda ◽  
T. Osawa ◽  
M. Uchiza ◽  
N. Tameoka ◽  
T. Endo ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 162 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. D. Van Steelandt ◽  
V. M. Tanco ◽  
M. H. Ratto ◽  
G. P. Adams

Systemic administration of ovulation-inducing factor (OIF), discovered recently in seminal plasma of llamas, alpacas (induced ovulators), and cattle (spontaneous ovulators), stimulated ovulation in >90% of female llamas and alpacas. The objective of the present study was to test the hypothesis that purified OIF from llama seminal plasma would induce ovulation in cattle. Peripubertal heifers, weighing 323 � 27 kg, were used to minimize the confounding effect of spontaneous ovulation. Heifers (n = 11/group) were treated intramuscularly with 1.0 mg/100 kg of purified OIF, 100 µg of GnRH (positive control), or 2.5 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (negative control). Ovarian dynamics were monitored daily by transrectal ultrasonography for 10 days post-treatment. Blood samples were collected at 0.5- to 1-h intervals for 8 h, beginning at the time of treatment. Ovulation occurred in 9/11 (82%) of GnRH-treated heifers and in 1/11 (9%) heifers in each of the OIF- and saline-treated groups (P < 0.05). A surge in plasma LH concentration was detected within 30 min of treatment in the GnRH group (2.2 � 0.1 ng mL–1; P < 0.05), but remained at the basal level in the OIF- and saline-treated groups (0.3 � 0.1 and 0.2 � 0.1 ng mL–1, respectively). The onset of regression of the dominant follicle present at the time of treatment was earlier (P < 0.05) in OIF- v. saline-treated heifers (3.1 � 0.6 days v. 6.0 � 0.7 days). The interval from treatment to follicular wave emergence was shorter (P < 0.05) in GnRH- and OIF-treated heifers than in those treated with saline (1.1 � 0.4 days, 1.5 � 0.3 days, and 3.1 � 0.3 days, respectively). A similar pattern was observed for emergence of the second follicular wave (5.1 � 0.7 days, 4.6 � 0.5 days, and 6.6 � 0.4 days, respectively). Purified OIF did not induce ovulation in heifers but hastened both the regression of the extant dominant follicle and follicular wave emergence. Results provide a rationale for the hypothesis that OIF from seminal plasma is involved in controlling follicular wave dynamics in spontaneously ovulating species (e.g., Bos taurus) through a suppressive effect on the dominant follicle. The mechanism of action on ovarian follicular wave dynamics, as well as species specificity, remains to be elucidated.


2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
M. P. Palhao ◽  
M. A. Beg ◽  
M. T. Rodrigues ◽  
R. R. Araújo ◽  
J. H. M. Viana ◽  
...  

The present experiment used the Day 4 ablation model for increasing the incidence of double ovulations in heifers. The objective was to compare follicle growth and plasma hormone concentrations associated with single v. double ovulations. Follicles ≥5 mm were ablated at 4 days post-ovulation to induce a prominent FSH surge and a new follicular wave, and 2 injections of PGF2 (12 h apart) were given 2 days later (Day 6) to favor ovulation. Beginning on Day 5, the 3 largest follicles of the induced wave were scanned twice a day until 36 h after the next ovulation. Blood samples were taken at 6-h intervals starting when the largest follicle reached ≥8.0 mm (expected deviation at 8.5 mm; Ginther et al. 1996) and continued until 36 h after the next ovulation. Concentrations of LH and FSH were measured by validated RIA for cattle (LH measured by Ginther et al. 1999; FSH measured by Adams et al. 1992) and concentrations of oestradiol measured by a commercially available RIA kit (Siddiqui et al. 2009). From a total of 31 heifers, 16 (52%) or 15 (48%) developed a single or more than 1 dominant (≥ 10 mm) follicle in the follicular wave after ablation, respectively. For heifers with 2 dominant follicles, the second-largest follicle ovulated in 9 (60%) heifers and the overall double ovulation rate was 29% (9/31). Follicle diameters and plasma hormone concentrations were compared between single ovulators (n = 12) and double ovulators (n = 8). Diameter of the preovulatory follicles did not increase between the LH peak and ovulation in either the single or double ovulations. In double ovulators, the interval from follicle deviation to the peak of the preovulatory LH surge was shorter (1.9 ± 0.2 days v. 2.5 ± 0.2 days; P < 0.02) and the diameter of the largest preovulatory follicle was smaller (12.2 ± 0.5 mm v. 13.3 ± 0.3 mm; P < 0.02) than in single ovulators, respectively. The LH concentrations of the preovulatory surge did not differ between single and double ovulators for 24 h on each side of the peak (main effect of hour only; P < 0.0001). When data were normalized to the LH peak, the peak of the preovulatory FSH and estradiol surges occurred in synchrony with the peak of LH surge for both groups. A group effect (P < 0.0001) for FSH resulted from a lower concentration averaged over hours in double ovulators. Estradiol showed a group by hour interaction (P < 0.008), reflecting greater concentrations in the double ovulators before and at peak. In conclusion, an increased Supported by the Eutheria Foundation, Cross Plains, WI, USA. Submission supported by FAPEMIG.


Reproduction ◽  
2002 ◽  
pp. 875-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
FX Donadeu ◽  
OJ Ginther

Follicular waves and associated circulating hormone concentrations were studied during the anovulatory season in pony mares (n=8). Follicles were monitored by ultrasonography and a blood sample was taken daily from 29 January until ovulation (mean, 28 April). A mid-anovulatory period (largest follicle, 16.0+/-0.5 mm in diameter) and transitional period (largest follicle, 22.4+/-0.5 mm) were distinctive in each mare. The two periods were delineated by an increase in the diameter of the largest follicle to >/=21.0 mm. Follicular waves, identified by significant increases in the mean diameter of the second to sixth largest follicles, were detected during both the mid-anovulatory and transitional periods. The mean number of follicles >/=15.0 mm in diameter and the diameter of the second to sixth largest follicles increased in association with statistically identified FSH surges. The pattern of the FSH concentration changes during surges did not change during the mid-anovulatory and transitional periods. During the declining portion of the FSH surge, follicle growth continued and circulating total inhibin increased, indicating suppression of FSH by inhibin from the growing follicles. Circulating oestradiol or LH did not change relative to wave emergence. Results indicated that follicular waves occurred during the second-half of the anovulatory season, even during the period of lowest follicular activity. On a temporal basis, follicular wave emergence was stimulated by surges in circulating FSH. However, the increase in follicle growth to >/=21.0 mm in diameter for the wave at the beginning of the transitional period and for the subsequent waves was not attributable to a change in the characteristics of the associated FSH surges.


2007 ◽  
Vol 77 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 222-223
Author(s):  
Behzad Toosi ◽  
Ashley Ziegler ◽  
Srinivas Seekallu ◽  
David Barrett ◽  
Norman Rawlings

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reuben J. Mapletoft ◽  
Gabriel A. Bó

Superovulation protocols have improved greatly since the early days of bovine embryo transfer when purified gonadotrophins were not available, follicular wave dynamics were unknown physiological phenomena and prostaglandins were not available. Although superstimulatory protocols in cattle are normally initiated mid-cycle, elective control of follicular wave emergence and ovulation have had a great impact on the application of on-farm embryo transfer. However, the most common treatment for the synchronisation of follicular wave emergence involves the use of oestradiol, which cannot be used in many parts of the world. Therefore, the need for alternative treatments has driven recent research. An approach that has shown promise is to initiate follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) treatments at the time of the emergence of the new follicular wave following ovulation induced by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone. Alternatively, it has been shown that it may be possible to ignore follicular wave status and, by extending the treatment protocol, induce subordinate follicles to superovulate. Finally, the short half-life of pituitary FSH necessitates twice-daily treatments, which are time-consuming, stressful and subject to error. Recent treatment protocols have permitted superstimulation with a single FSH treatment or two treatments 48 h apart, reducing the need for animal handling during gonadotrophin treatments.


2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 130 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Mapletoft ◽  
M.G. Colazo ◽  
J.A. Small ◽  
D.R. Ward ◽  
J.P. Kastelic

The objective was to investigate the effect of dose of estradiol valerate (EV) on ovarian follicular growth profiles, intervals to follicular wave emergence and, following CIDR removal, estrus and ovulation in beef cows. On Day 0, 43 non-lactating, crossbred beef cows, 3 to 9 yr of age and at random stages of the estrous cycle, received a CIDR (Bioniche Animal Health; Belleville, Ontario, Canada) and were randomly allocated to one of four groups to receive no further treatment (Control; n=10), or an injection of 1mg (n=11), 2mg (n=10), or 5mg (n=12) i.m. of EV (Sigma Chemical Co, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 2mL canola oil. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and cows received 500μg i.m. of cloprostenol (Estrumate, Schering Plough Animal Health, Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada). Ovaries were examined by transrectal ultrasonography once daily until 48h after CIDR removal to detect ovarian follicle growth profiles, and twice daily thereafter to detect ovulation. Data were analyzed by ANOVA (LSD and Bartlett’s tests) and chi-square procedures. One cow (5mg EV group) lost the CIDR and was removed from all analyses. There was an effect of day (P&lt;0.0001) on CL diameter, but the effects of treatment (P=0.3), and the treatment-by-day interaction (P=0.1), were not significant. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7d in 7/10 (70%) Control cows and 31/32 (97%; P&lt;0.04) EV-treated cows (one cow in late diestrus at the time of treatment did not respond to 1mg EV). Mean (±SD) interval from treatment to wave emergence was longer (P&lt;0.03) in cows treated with 5mg EV (4.8±1.2d) than in those treated with 1mg (3.2±0.9 days) or 2mg EV (3.4±0.8 days), while Control cows were intermediate (3.8±2.0 days). Although follicular wave emergence tended (P&lt;0.09) to be more synchronous in cows receiving EV, intervals from CIDR removal to estrus (P=0.7) and ovulation (P=0.8) did not differ among groups. Diameter of the dominant follicle was smaller (P&lt;0.04) at CIDR removal and tended to be smaller (P&lt;0.08) just prior to ovulation in the 5mg EV group (8.5±2.2 and 13.2±0.6mm, respectively) than in the Control (11.8±4.6 and 15.5±2.9mm, respectively) or 1mg EV (11.7±2.5 and 15.1±2.2mm, respectively) groups, with the 2mg EV group (10.7±1.5 and 14.3±1.7mm, respectively) intermediate. Diameter of the dominant follicle at CIDR removal was less variable (P&lt;0.01) in the 2 and 5mg EV groups than in the Control group and intermediate in the 1mg EV group. In summary, dose of EV affected follicular dynamics, interval to and synchrony of follicular wave emergence, and dominant follicle diameter at CIDR removal and just prior to ovulation in CIDR-treated cows. However, interval from CIDR removal to estrus and ovulation was not affected by treatment. Results suggest that a dose of 2mg EV may be most efficacious in synchronizing follicular wave emergence in CIDR-treated cows.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 820-829
Author(s):  
Pablo Sebastián Reineri ◽  
María Sumampa Coria ◽  
Santiago Callejas ◽  
Gustavo Adolfo Palma

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document