A retrospective cohort study of venous thromboembolism(VTE) in 1035 Japanese myeloma patients treated with thalidomide; lower incidence without statistically significant association between specific risk factors and development of VTE and effects of thromboprophylaxis with aspirin and warfarin

2013 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Kato ◽  
Hina Takano ◽  
Ayako Ichikawa ◽  
Mayuko Koshino ◽  
Aiko Igarashi ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Kanna Shinkawa ◽  
Satomi Yoshida ◽  
Tomotsugu Seki ◽  
Motoko Yanagita ◽  
Koji Kawakami

Abstract Background Nephrotic syndrome is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the risk factors of VTE in nephrotic syndrome, other than hypoalbuminemia and severe proteinuria, are not well established. Therefore we aimed to investigate the risk factors of VTE in patients with nephrotic syndrome. Methods This retrospective cohort study used data from a Japanese nationwide claims database. We identified patients ≥18 years of age hospitalized with nephrotic syndrome. Through multivariable logistic regression, we determined the risk factors of VTE in patients with nephrotic syndrome during hospitalization. Results Of the 7473 hospitalized patients with nephrotic syndrome without VTE, 221 (3.0%) developed VTE. In the VTE group, 14 (6.3%), 11 (5.0%) and 198 (89.6%) patients developed pulmonary embolism, renal vein thrombosis and deep vein thrombosis, respectively. We found that female sex {odds ratio [OR] 1.39 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05–1.85]}, body mass index (BMI) ≥30 [OR 2.01 (95% CI 1.35–2.99)], acute kidney injury [AKI; OR 1.67 (95% CI 1.07–2.62)], sepsis [OR 2.85 (95% CI 1.37–5.93)], lupus nephritis [OR 3.64 (95% CI 1.58–8.37)] and intravenous corticosteroids use [OR 2.40 (95% CI 1.52–3.80)] were associated with a significantly higher risk of developing VTE. Conclusions In patients with nephrotic syndrome, female sex, BMI ≥30, AKI, sepsis, lupus nephritis and intravenous corticosteroid use may help evaluate the risk of VTE.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1258-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan C. Chen ◽  
Pooja D. Loftus ◽  
Susan C. Weber ◽  
Nhat Minh Hoang ◽  
James Gilbert ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a rare autoimmune disorder in which auto-antibodies target red blood cell surface antigens, causing hemolysis. The incidence is estimated to be 0.8 per 100,000 (Lechner and Jager, Blood 2010). Depending on the temperature at which the auto-antibodies are most active, AIHA is classified as warm, cold, or mixed. Main risk factors include malignancy, viral infection, and rheumatologic disorders. Thromboembolism is an important complication of AIHA that has received increasing attention in case series and small observational reports. However, there has not yet been a study that compares the risk of thromboembolism in AIHA with that of matched, non-AIHA patients in a longitudinal fashion. OBJECTIVES 1) To assess the risk of arterial and venous thromboembolism in AIHA patients using a longitudinal, retrospective cohort study. 2) To define the contribution from usual thrombosis risk factors (defined in Methods section) in the development of thromboembolism in AIHA patients. METHODS We derived our cohorts from Stanford University's Standards-Based Translational Research Informatics Platform (STRIDE). The STRIDE database houses records since 2003 for over 2.1 million patients who receive their care at Stanford Hospital and Clinics. We identified 156 patients diagnosed with AIHA of any type and matched them with 312 non-AIHA patients (control) in a 1:2 ratio. To achieve stringent matching, patients in the control group were selected to have known risk factors for AIHA--malignancy, viral infections, and rheumatologic diseases--without developing AIHA itself. We assessed the incidence of arterial and venous thromboembolism in the AIHA and non-AIHA groups. Within each group, we assessed the association between thromboembolism and the presence of thrombosis risk factors, which we based on the PADUA criteria (Barbar et al, J Throm Haemost 2010). The PADUA risk factors comprise a weighted sum known as the PADUA score (max score of 20), and we compared the median PADUA score between AIHA and non-AIHA patients with thromboembolism using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Interquartile ranges (IQR) of PADUA scores were calculated. Finally, using inverse-probability weighting to achieve matching thromboembolism propensity scores between AIHA and non-AIHA patients, we derived an odds ratio for the development of thromboembolism given a diagnosis of AIHA. RESULTS A significantly higher proportion of AIHA patients developed arterial and venous thromboembolism than non-AIHA patients (29% vs. 19%, respectively; p < 0.05). Notably, the median PADUA score was not different between AIHA and non-AIHA patients with thromboembolism (4, IQR [2-7] vs 4.5, IQR [3-7], respectively, n.s.), despite the aforementioned difference in thromboembolism incidence. However, the distribution of PADUA risk factors in each group did differ: malignancy was seen in a smaller proportion of AIHA patients with thromboembolism than in non-AIHA counterparts (31% vs 57%, respectively; p < 0.05), while acute infection and/or rheumatologic disorders was seen in a larger proportion of AIHA patients with thromboembolism than non-AIHA counterparts (53% vs 25%, respectively; p < 0.05; see Table 1). After additional analysis to ensure propensity score matching, we found that AIHA confers an odds ratio of 2.44 (95% CI [1.16-5.10], p < 0.05) for the development of thromboembolism. CONCLUSION Different thrombosis risk factors contribute to the development of thromboembolism in AIHA patients than in non-AIHA patients. However, AIHA patients carry a significantly higher risk of thromboembolism than non-AIHA patients, and this risk is not attributable to the usual thrombosis risk factors considered in the PADUA criteria. Our finding suggests a need for clinical trials to study the role of thrombo-prevention in AIHA patients. Table 1 Percentage of PADUA risk factors in AIHA and non-AIHA patients with thromboembolism. Table 1. Percentage of PADUA risk factors in AIHA and non-AIHA patients with thromboembolism. Disclosures Chen: True North Therapeutics: Research Funding. Loftus:True North Therapeutics: Research Funding. Weber:True North Therapeutics: Research Funding. Hoang:True North Therapeutics: Research Funding. Gilbert:True North Therapeutics: Employment. Kummar:True North Therapeutics: Research Funding.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Sobiecka ◽  
Monika Szturmowicz ◽  
Katarzyna Lewandowska ◽  
Agata Kowalik ◽  
Ewa Łyżwa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis share commonalities in pathogenesis shifting haemostasis balance towards the procoagulant and antifibrinolytic activity. Several studies have suggested an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in IPF. The association between venous thromboembolism and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis has not been studied yet. Methods A retrospective cohort study of IPF and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis patients diagnosed in single tertiary referral center between 2005 and 2018 was conducted. The incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism was evaluated. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism and survival among those with and without venous thromboembolism were assessed. Results A total of 411 (259 IPF and 152 chronic hypersensitivity) patients were included (mean age 66.7 ± 8.4 vs 51.0 ± 13.3 years, respectively). There were 12 (4.6%) incident cases of venous thromboembolism in IPF and 5 (3.3%) in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis cohort. The relative risk (RR) of venous thromboembolism in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis was not significantly different to that found in patients with IPF (7.1 vs 11.8/1000 person-years, RR 1.661 95% CI 0.545–6.019, respectively). The treatment with systemic steroids (OR 5.38; 95% CI 1.65–18.8, p = 0.006) and GAP stage 3 (OR 7.85; 95% CI 1.49–34.9; p = 0.037) were significant risk factors for venous thromboembolism in IPF. Arterial hypertension and pulmonary hypertension significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. There were no significant differences in survival between patients with and without venous thromboembolism. Conclusions The patients with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis have a marked increase in the risk of venous thromboembolism, similar to the patients with IPF. Venous thromboembolism does not affect the survival of patients with IPF and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document