scholarly journals A phase 1, open-label, randomized study to compare the immunogenicity and safety of different administration routes and doses of virosomal influenza vaccine in elderly

Vaccine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (44) ◽  
pp. 5262-5272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yotam Levin ◽  
Efrat Kochba ◽  
Georgi Shukarev ◽  
Sarah Rusch ◽  
Guillermo Herrera-Taracena ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1959-1968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfonso Carmona Martinez ◽  
Ignacio Salamanca de la Cueva ◽  
Philippe Boutet ◽  
Carline Vanden Abeele ◽  
Igor Smolenov ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4595-TPS4595
Author(s):  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
Rupal Satish Bhatt ◽  
Martin Henner Voss ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Eric Jonasch ◽  
...  

TPS4595 Background: The treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) with therapies targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway delays disease progression; however, overcoming tumor resistance to these agents remains a therapeutic challenge. Activin receptor-like kinase 1(ALK1) is a type 1 receptor in the TGF-ß superfamily and is selectively expressed on activated endothelial cells. While VEGF drives the proliferative stage of angiogenesis, ALK1 is primarily involved in the maturation phase. Dalantercept is a human ALK1-Fc receptor fusion protein that binds to bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) 9 and 10 (ligands for ALK1) and acts as a ligand trap. Preclinically, dalantercept showed delayed tumor growth in solid tumor models, including RCC models alone and in combination with sunitinib. In RCC models, the addition of dalantercept to sunitinib enhanced the reduction in tumor blood flow compared to sunitinib alone. Dalantercept showed anti-tumor activity in a completed phase 1 study in 37 pts. with advanced solid tumors. Based on this promising data, we hypothesize that ALK1 inhibition may be synergistic with axitinib, a VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in pts. with mRCC. Methods: A two-part, multi-center, open label phase 2 study to evaluate safety, tolerability, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of dalantercept plus axitinib as second line therapy is ongoing. In Part 1, dose escalation using a 3+3 design will assess the safety and PK of dalantercept SC every 3 weeks plus axitinib 5 mg PO BID until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Once the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has been determined, up to 20 pts. may be enrolled in an expansion cohort to establish safety for the recommended dose for Part 2. Part 2 will include 112 pts. randomized 1:1 to dalantercept plus axitinib vs. axitinib alone. Key eligibility criteria are one prior TKI in the first-line setting, ECOG </= 1, and measurable disease. The primary efficacy endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints are OS, TTP, ORR, DOR, DCR, and PD biomarkers on archived tumor and serum specimens including BMP9/10 and ALK1 expression. Clinical trial information: NCT01727336.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lia Gore ◽  
Timothy J. Triche ◽  
Jason E. Farrar ◽  
Daniel Wai ◽  
Christophe Legendre ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackgroundDecitabine is a deoxycytidine nucleoside derivative inhibitor of DNA-methyltransferases, which has been studied extensively and is approved for myelodysplastic syndrome in adults but with less focus in children. Accordingly, we conducted a phase 1 multicenter, randomized, open-label study to evaluate decitabine pre-treatment before standard induction therapy in children with newly diagnosed AML to assess safety and tolerability and explore a number of biologic endpoints.ResultsTwenty-four patients were fully assessable for all study objectives per protocol (10 in Arm A, 14 in Arm B). All patients experienced neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The most common grade 3 and 4 non-hematologic adverse events observed were gastrointestinal toxicities and hypophosphatemia. Plasma decitabine PK were similar to previously reported adult data. Overall CR/CRi was similar for the two arms. MRD negativity at end-induction was 85% in Arm A versus 67% in Arm B patients. DNA methylation measured in peripheral blood over the course of treatment tracked with blast clearance and matched marrow aspirates at day 0 and day 21. Unlike end-point marrow analyses, promoter methylation in blood identified an apparent reversal of response in the lone treatment failure, one week prior to the patient’s marrow aspirate confirming non-response. Decitabine-induced effects of end-induction marrows in Arm A were reflected by changes in DNA methylation and gene expression comparison with matched paired marrow diagnostic aspirates.ConclusionsThis first-in-pediatrics trial demonstrates that decitabine prior to standard combination chemotherapy is feasible and well tolerated in children with newly diagnosed AML. Pre-treatment with decitabine may represent a newer therapeutic option for pediatric AML, especially as it appears to induce important epigenetic alterations. The novel biological correlates studied in this trial offer a clinically relevant window into disease progression and remission. Additional studies are needed to definitively assess whether decitabine can enhance durability responses in children with AML. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01177540.


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 916-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie E Ledgerwood ◽  
Chih-Jen Wei ◽  
Zonghui Hu ◽  
Ingelise J Gordon ◽  
Mary E Enama ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11011-11011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sant P. Chawla ◽  
Brian Andrew Van Tine ◽  
Seth Pollack ◽  
Kristen N. Ganjoo ◽  
Anthony D. Elias ◽  
...  

11011 Background: CMB305 (C) is an immunotherapy designed to generate an anti-NY-ESO-1 immune response (IR). C consists of a dendritic cell-targeting lentiviral vector encoding NY-ESO-1 gene (LV305), and a TLR-4 agonist NY-ESO-1 recombinant protein plus GLA-SE (G305). A Phase 1 study demonstrated C is safe, generates IR and conveys a median overall survival (mOS) of 23.7 months (15.5, not reached [NR]) for soft tissue sarcomas & 29.2 months (12.2, NR) for synovial sarcoma (SS) (ESMO 2018). We evaluated efficacy and safety of C and atezolizumab (A) vs A alone in NY-ESO-1+ SS and myxoid round cell liposarcoma (MRCL). Methods: A prospective randomized open label phase 2 study of C (LV305 Intradermal Days 0, 14, 42, 70 + G305 Intramuscular Days 28, 56, 84 then q 6wk up to one year (yr)) + A (1200mg IV q3wk) vs A alone in advanced NY-ESO-1+ SS/MRCL. Primary endpoints of OS and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints of safety, IR, and response rate and post hoc analysis by line of therapy. Results: 88 patients (pts) were enrolled and dosed. Arm C+A: median age 48 yrs, 73% SS, 98% relapsed metastatic, 73% ≥2 prior lines chemotherapy; Arm A: 47 yrs, 67% SS, 84% relapsed metastatic, 53% ≥2 prior lines chemotherapy. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) Grade 1/2, no treatment related deaths. Summary of clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Despite no major differences in PFS and OS between the treatment arms (Arm C+A had more advanced disease and more prior lines of chemotherapy), Arm A +C achieved PRs, a higher level of anti-NY-ESO-1 IR, and pts with IR had numerically superior outcomes. Moreover, the clinical benefit of C+A in earlier lines of therapy warrant further study. Clinical trial information: NCT02609984. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document