scholarly journals Lower vaccine uptake amongst older individuals living alone: A systematic review and meta-analysis of social determinants of vaccine uptake

Vaccine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (18) ◽  
pp. 2315-2328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anu Jain ◽  
A.J. van Hoek ◽  
Delia Boccia ◽  
Sara L. Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vaccine Uptake ◽  
Living Alone ◽  
Older Individuals

scholarly journals Influence of Material Deprivation on Clinical Outcomes Among People Living with HIV in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasiliki Papageorgiou ◽  
Bethan Davies ◽  
Emily Cooper ◽  
Ariana Singer ◽  
Helen Ward
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hiv Treatment ◽  
Material Deprivation ◽  
Hiv Care ◽  
People Living With Hiv ◽  
Hiv Care Continuum ◽  
Care Continuum ◽  
Living With Hiv

AbstractDespite developments in HIV treatment and care, disparities persist with some not fully benefiting from improvements in the HIV care continuum. We conducted a systematic review to explore associations between social determinants and HIV treatment outcomes (viral suppression and treatment adherence) in high-income countries. A random effects meta-analysis was performed where there were consistent measurements of exposures. We identified 83 observational studies eligible for inclusion. Social determinants linked to material deprivation were identified as education, employment, food security, housing, income, poverty/deprivation, socioeconomic status/position, and social class; however, their measurement and definition varied across studies. Our review suggests a social gradient of health persists in the HIV care continuum; people living with HIV who reported material deprivation were less likely to be virologically suppressed or adherent to antiretrovirals. Future research should use an ecosocial approach to explore these interactions across the lifecourse to help propose a causal pathway.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Knee Replacement in Patients <65 Years of Age—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3150
Author(s):  
Jason Trieu ◽  
Daniel J. Gould ◽  
Chris Schilling ◽  
Tim Spelman ◽  
Michelle M. Dowsey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Functional Decline ◽  
Older Individuals ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Total Knee

An increasing number of total knee replacements (TKRs) are being performed in response to the growing burden of osteoarthritis. Patients <65 years of age represent the fastest growing group of TKR recipients and are expected to account for an increasing number of primary and revision procedures. Concerns have been raised about the outcomes that can be expected by this age demographic who are more active, physically demanding, and have longer life expectancies compared to older TKR recipients. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of TKR for osteoarthritis in patients <65 years of age, compared to older individuals. A systematic search of Embase and Medline was conducted to identify studies which examined patient-reported outcomes measured using disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life instruments. Ten studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in this review. These studies comprised 1747 TKRs performed between 1977 and 2014. In the meta-analysis of two prospective studies (288 TKRs), patients <65 years of age were able to attain large and clinically meaningful improvements in pain, function, and quality of life. One of these studies (61 TKRs) suggested that patients <55 years of age attained a larger degree of improvement compared to older individuals. Results into the second postoperative decade were less certain, with some data suggesting a high prevalence of pain and patterns of functional decline. Further research is required to investigate longer-term outcomes following TKR for osteoarthritis in younger patients.

scholarly journals Household and area-level social determinants of multimorbidity: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
pp. jech-2020-214691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Ingram ◽  
Sarah Ledden ◽  
Sarah Beardon ◽  
Manuel Gomes ◽  
Sue Hogarth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
North America ◽  
General Population ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Household Income ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Household Composition ◽  
Living Alone ◽  
Study Quality ◽  
Household Level

BackgroundNo clear synthesis of evidence examining household and area-level social determinants of multimorbidity exists. This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature on associations between household and area-level social determinants of health (SDoH) and multimorbidity prevalence or incidence in the general population.MethodsSix databases (MedLine, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus and Scopus) were searched. The search was limited to peer-reviewed studies conducted in high-income countries and published in English between 2010 and 2019. A second reviewer screened all titles with abstracts and a subset of full texts. Study quality was assessed and protocol pre-registered (CRD42019135281).Results41 studies spanning North America, Europe and Australasia were included. Household income and area-level deprivation were the most explored with fairly consistent findings. The odds of multimorbidity were up to 4.4 times higher for participants with the lowest level of income compared with the highest level. Those living in the most deprived areas had the highest prevalence or incidence of multimorbidity (pooled OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.42). Associations between deprivation and multimorbidity differed by age and multimorbidity type. Findings from the few studies investigating household tenure, household composition and area-level rurality were mixed and contradictory; homeownership and rurality were associated with increased and decreased multimorbidity, while living alone was found to be associated with a higher risk of multimorbidity and not associated.ConclusionImproving our understanding of broader social determinants of multimorbidity—particularly at the household level—could help inform strategies to tackle multimorbidity.

scholarly journals Social and Economic Factors and Malnutrition or the Risk of Malnutrition in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Besora-Moreno ◽  
Elisabet Llauradó ◽  
Lucia Tarro ◽  
Rosa Solà
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Socioeconomic Factors ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Educational Level ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Living Alone ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Food Expenditure

Malnutrition in the elderly could be tackled by addressing socioeconomic factors. This study aimed to determine the magnitude of the relationship between socioeconomic factors and the malnutrition or malnutrition risk (MR) in the elderly. The PubMed and SCOPUS databases were searched for observational studies that included assessment of malnutrition or/and MR and socioeconomic variables (educational level, living alone, marital status, income and occupational level, feeling of loneliness, place of residence, and food expenditure) in ≥60-year-old subjects, published in English among 2000–2018 (PROSPERO: CRD42019137097). The systematic review included 40 observational studies (34 cross-sectional and 4 cohort studies) and 16 cross-sectional studies in the meta-analysis (34,703 individuals) of malnutrition and MR in relation to low educational level (Odds Ratio (OR): 1.48; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.33–1.64; p < 0.001), living alone (OR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.73–2.14; p < 0.001), being single, widowed, or divorced (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.57–1.90; p < 0.001), and low income level (OR: 2.69; 95% CI: 2.35–3.08; p < 0.001), and considering these four socioeconomic factors, malnutrition and MR is associated with them (OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.73–1.93; p < 0.001). Malnutrition and MR could be reduced by increasing economic level, supporting people living alone or being single, widowed, and divorced, and improving lifelong learning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document