The impact of level of education on adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 281-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianfranco Damiani ◽  
Danila Basso ◽  
Anna Acampora ◽  
Caterina B.N.A. Bianchi ◽  
Giulia Silvestrini ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 7-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbey Diaz ◽  
Jimin Kang ◽  
Suzanne P Moore ◽  
Peter Baade ◽  
Danette Langbecker ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. e001351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Teresa Yeh ◽  
Caitlin E Kennedy ◽  
Hugo de Vuyst ◽  
Manjulaa Narasimhan

IntroductionHuman papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling test kits may increase screening for and early detection of cervical cancer and reduce its burden globally. To inform WHO self-care guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of HPV self-sampling among adult women on cervical (pre-)cancer screening uptake, screening frequency, social harms/adverse events and linkage to clinical assessment/treatment.MethodsThe included studies compared women using cervical cancer screening services with HPV self-sampling with women using standard of care, measured at least one outcome, and were published in a peer-reviewed journal. We searched PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CNIAHL), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) and Embase through October 2018. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the Evidence Project tool for non-randomised studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models to generate pooled estimates of relative risk (RR).Results33 studies in 34 articles with 369 017 total participants met the inclusion criteria: 29 RCTs and 4 observational studies. All studies examined HPV self-sampling; comparison groups were standard of care (eg, Pap smear, visual inspection with acetic acid, clinician-collected HPV testing). 93% of participants were from high-income countries. All 33 studies measured cervical cancer screening uptake. Meta-analysis found greater screening uptake among HPV self-sampling participants compared with control (RR: 2.13, 95% CI 1.89 to 2.40). Effect size varied by HPV test kit dissemination method, whether mailed directly to home (RR: 2.27, 95% CI 1.89 to 2.71), offered door-to-door (RR: 2.37, 95% CI 1.12 to 5.03) or requested on demand (RR: 1.28, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.82). Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference in linkage to clinical assessment/treatment between arms (RR: 1.12, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.57). No studies measured screening frequency or social harms/adverse events.ConclusionA growing evidence base, mainly from high-income countries and with significant heterogeneity, suggests HPV self-sampling can increase cervical cancer screening uptake compared with standard of care, with a marginal effect on linkage to clinical assessment/treatment.Systematic review registration numberPROSPERO CRD42018114871.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Anderson ◽  
Donald S. Bourne ◽  
Kim A. Peterson ◽  
Katherine M. Mackey

Abstract Background: Guideline-based breast and cervical cancer screenings are fundamental components of high-quality preventive women’s health care services. Accurate measurement of screening rates is vital to ensure all women are adequately screened. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide an updated synthesis of the evidence on the accuracy of self-reported measures of cervical and breast cancer screening compared to medical records. Methods: To identify studies, we searched MEDLINE®, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other sources up to July 2019. Two reviewers sequentially selected studies, abstracted data, and assessed internal validity and strength of the evidence. Adjusted summary numbers for sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Unscreened women tended to over-report screening among 39 included studies examining the accuracy of self-report for cervical and/or breast cancer screening. The specificity of self-report was 48% (95% CI 41 to 56) for cervical cancer screening and 61% (95% CI 53 to 69) for breast cancer screening while the sensitivity of self-report was much higher at 96% (95% CI 94 to 97) for cervical cancer screening and 96% (95% CI 95 to 98). We have moderate confidence in these findings, as they come from a large number of studies directly assessing the accuracy of self-report compared to medical records and are consistent with findings from a previous meta-analysis. Conclusions: Unscreened women tend to over-report cervical and breast cancer screening, while screened women more accurately report their screening. Future research should focus on assessing the impact of over-reporting on clinical and system-level outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10556-10556
Author(s):  
Stephen Kiptoo ◽  
Naftali Wisindi Busakhala ◽  
Peter Itsura ◽  
Philip Tonui ◽  
Terry Vik ◽  
...  

10556 Background: Cancer is the third leading cause of death with about 48,000 new yearly diagnoses in Kenya. Breast and cervical cancers are the major leading cancers in females, both of which are curable with access to timely and effective care. To meet population health goals, early abnormalities of the cervix and breast must be treated promptly to maximize the chance for cure. The AMPATH Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program (ABCCCP) was initiated to improve access to screening and diagnostic services for breast and cervical cancer in Kenya by addressing the barriers of cancer care through a population health approach, working with communities and the Ministry of Health in Kenya with a potential for scaling these efforts to other parts of the region. Methods: We performed an interim analysis 3 years into a 5-year program, to assess the impact of COVID-19 on our screening program. Statistical descriptive summaries were used to show the trend of screening using visual inspection with acetic acid and breast clinical examination. The screening was conducted facility-based along with community screening upon requests across nine counties. Also, we conducted capacity building through mentoring of health care providers and initiating a telemedicine program to improve patient care and management plans. Results: From 2018-2021, we conducted training, connected 12 centers with telemedicine capacity and screened a total of 100,973 persons were for breast and cervical cancer. The yearly trends demonstrate that the facility routine screenings were maintained: 23,421 (2018); 27,997 (2019); and 28,045 (2020). The total women seen through organized mass screenings however declined (10,304 (2018); 10,107 (2019); and 1,099 (2020), respectively) as this type of screening was stopped after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic. Of all women screened, 3,019 (2.98%) had clinical abnormalities requiring follow-up per standard of care including 1,781(1.8%) who were eventually histologically confirmed to have cancer. During our first and second year of the program, 83 physicians were trained on cancer management and treatment, 341 nurses were trained on breast and cervical cancer screening procedures, and 247 community health workers (CHW) were trained on the importance of screening to enlighten the community on awareness. However, this training was suspended in our year three due to COVID-19. Conclusions: An integrated training program utilizing CHW, nurses and physicians are an effective means for breast and cervical cancer screening in LMC, such as Kenya. This capacity building allows flexibility and sustainability even in the midst of the global COVID-19 pandemic. We also demonstrated successful integration with the county government for program sustainability. The use of telemedicine has greatly enhanced our screening and patient care across several facilities in western Kenya.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0249960
Author(s):  
Agajie Likie Bogale ◽  
Tilahun Teklehaymanot ◽  
Jemal Haidar Ali ◽  
Getnet Mitike Kassie

Background To establish successful strategies and increasing the utilization of preventive services, there is a need to explore the extent to which the general female population is aware and use the service for cervical cancer-screening among women infected with HIV in Africa. Available evidences in this regard are controversial and non-conclusive on this potential issue and therefore, we estimated the pooled effect of the proportion of knowledge, attitude and practice of HIV infected African women towards cervical cancer screening to generate evidence for improved prevention strategies. Methods We applied a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted in Africa and reported the proportion of knowledge, attitude and practice towards cervical cancer screening. We searched electronic databases: PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, ScienceDirect, Web of science, Cumulative Index of Nursing and allied Health Sciences (CINAHL) and Google scholar databases to retrieve papers published in English language till August 2020. We used random-effects model to estimate the pooled effect, and funnel plot to assess publication bias. The registration number of this review study protocol is CRD42020210879. Results In this review, we included eight published papers comprising 2,186 participants. The estimated pooled proportion of knowledge of the participants was 43.0% (95%CI:23.0–64.0) while the pooled estimates of attitudes and practices were 38.0% (95%CI: 1.0–77.0) and 41.0% (95%CI: 4.0–77.0), respectively. The proportion of the outcome variables were extremely heterogeneous across the studies with I2> 98%). Conclusion The pooled estimates of knowledge, attitude and practice were lower than other middle income countries calls for further activities to enhance the uptake of the services and establish successful strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document