Contextual factors associated with uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening: A systematic review of the literature

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 906-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Plourde ◽  
Hilary K. Brown ◽  
Simone Vigod ◽  
Virginie Cobigo
2015 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 281-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianfranco Damiani ◽  
Danila Basso ◽  
Anna Acampora ◽  
Caterina B.N.A. Bianchi ◽  
Giulia Silvestrini ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 7-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbey Diaz ◽  
Jimin Kang ◽  
Suzanne P Moore ◽  
Peter Baade ◽  
Danette Langbecker ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 476-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung-Hyun Choi ◽  
Jeongyun Heo ◽  
Soyeun Kim ◽  
Young-Jee Jeon ◽  
Myungju Oh

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255581
Author(s):  
Mpho Keetile ◽  
Kagiso Ndlovu ◽  
Gobopamang Letamo ◽  
Mpho Disang ◽  
Sanni Yaya ◽  
...  

Background The most commonly diagnosed cancers among women are breast and cervical cancers, with cervical cancer being a relatively bigger problem in low and middle income countries (LMICs) than breast cancer. Methods The main aim of this study was to asses factors associated with and socioeconomic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening among women aged 15–64 years in Botswana. This study is part of the broad study on Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases in Botswana conducted (NCD survey) in 2016. The NCD survey was conducted across 3 cities and towns, 15 urban villages and 15 rural areas of Botswana. The survey collected information on several NCDs and risk factors including cervical and breast cancer screening. The survey adopted a multistage sampling design and a sample of 1178 participants (males and females) aged 15 years and above was selected in both urban and rural areas of Botswana. For this study, a sub-sample of 813 women aged 15–64 years was selected and included in the analysis. The inequality analysis was conducted using decomposition analysis using ADePT software version 6. Logistic regression models were used to show the association between socioeconomic variables and cervical and breast cancer screening using SPSS version 25. All comparisons were considered statistically significant at 5%. Results Overall, 6% and 62% of women reported that they were screened for breast and cervical cancer, respectively. Women in the poorest (AOR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.06–0.45) and poorer (AOR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.14–0.96) wealth quintiles were less likely to report cervical cancer screening compared to women in the richest wealth quintile. Similarly, for breast cancer, the odds of screening were found to be low among women in the poorest (AOR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.06–0.68) and the poorer (AOR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.13–0.81)) wealth quintiles. Concentration indices (CI) showed that cervical (CI = 0.2443) and breast cancer (CI = 0.3975) screening were more concentrated among women with high SES than women with low SES. Wealth status was observed to be the leading contributor to socioeconomic inequality observed for both cervical and breast cancer screening. Conclusions Findings in this study indicate the need for concerted efforts to address the health care needs of the poor in order to reduce cervical and breast cancer screening inequalities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document