Interventions using mHealth strategies to improve screening rates of cervical cancer: A scoping review

2021 ◽  
Vol 143 ◽  
pp. 106387
Author(s):  
Shristi Bhochhibhoya ◽  
Page D. Dobbs ◽  
Sarah B. Maness
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrícia Marques ◽  
Mariana Nunes ◽  
Maria da Luz Antunes ◽  
Bruno Heleno ◽  
Sónia Dias

Abstract Background Cervical cancer screening has been effective in reducing incidence and mortality of cervical cancer, leading European countries to implement screening programs. However, migrant women show lower screening participation compared to nationals. This scoping review aims to provide a synthesis of the growing evidence on factors associated with participation in cervical cancer screening among migrant women in Europe. Methods Electronic peer-reviewed databases were searched in November 2019 for studies on factors related to the participation of migrants in cervical cancer screening conducted in EU/EFTA countries, using comprehensive search expressions. Retrieved articles were screened and those eligible were selected for data extraction. Quantitative and qualitative studies were included. Factors were classified in barriers and facilitators and were divided into further categories. Results Twenty out of 96 articles were selected and analyzed. Factors associated with participation in cervical cancer screening were classified in categories related to sociodemographic, healthcare-system, psychological, migration, knowledge, language, and cultural factors. Lack of information, lack of female healthcare providers, poor language skills, and emotional responses to the test (especially fear, embarrassment and discomfort) were the most reported barriers to cervical cancer screening. Encouragement from healthcare providers and information available in migrants’ languages were frequently stated as facilitators. Results on the role of sociodemographic factors, such as age, education, employment and marital status, are the most conflicting, highlighting the complexity of the issue and the possibility of interactions between factors, resulting in different effects on cervical cancer screening participation among migrant women. Several identified barriers to screening are like those to access to healthcare services in general. Conclusions Efforts to increase migrant women’s participation in CCS must target barriers to access to healthcare services in general but also specific barriers, including cultural differences about sexuality and gender, past traumatic personal experiences, and the gender and competences of healthcare professionals performing CCS. Healthcare services should strengthen resources to meet migrants’ needs, including having CCS information translated and culturally adapted, as well as healthcare providers with skills to deal with cultural background. These findings can contribute to improve CCS programs among migrant women, reducing health disparities and enhancing their overall health and well-being.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 594-607
Author(s):  
Neha Mishra ◽  
Nilanchali Singh ◽  
Mohini Sachdeva ◽  
Prafull Ghatage

2021 ◽  
Vol 76 (12) ◽  
pp. 737-739
Author(s):  
Shristi Bhochhibhoya ◽  
Page D. Dobbs ◽  
Sarah B. Maness

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Petmore Zibako ◽  
Mbuzeleni Hlongwa ◽  
Nomsa Tsikai ◽  
Sarah Manyame ◽  
Themba G. Ginindza

Abstract Background Cancer is a non-communicable disease and is the number 2 leading cause of death globally. Among all cancers, cervical cancer is the number 1 killer of women in low-income countries (LICs). Cervical cancer is a well understood preventable cancer. The rates of cervical cancer are very varied and inversely proportional to the effectiveness of disease management policies. Management of cervical cancer includes prevention, screening, diagnosis and treatment. The main objective of this scoping review is to map the evidence on cervical cancer management in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to understand the coverage of cervical cancer prevention and treatment services and provide an opportunity to generate knowledge on the risk factors, attitudes and practices extendable globally. Methods and analysis This review will be guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework recommended for conducting scoping review studies. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Scr) checklist will also be completed to ensure that the review adheres to the sound methodological rigour acceptable for scoping review studies. The following electronic databases will be searched for potentially eligible articles: PubMed, Ebsco Host, Scopus and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Study screening procedures recommended by Higgins and Deeks will be followed. A narrative synthesis will be used, with data synthesised and interpreted using sifting, charting and sorting based on themes and key issues. Discussion Cervical cancer can become a disease of the past with a proper control strategy in place. It is therefore imperative to map available evidence on the management of cervical cancer to inform policy and advocacy action. More knowledge on the status quo will guide policymakers in ensuring cancer management guiding policies are formulated/updated/revised accordingly. Systematic review registration Not registered with PROSPERO (not needed). Protocol and registration This scoping review was not registered.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petmore Zibako ◽  
Mbuzeleni Hlongwa ◽  
Nomsa Tsikai ◽  
Sarah Manyame ◽  
Themba G Ginindza

Abstract BackgroundCancer is a non-communicable disease, and is the number two leading cause of death globally. Among all cancers, cervical cancer is the number one killer of women in Low-Income countries (LICs). Cervical cancer is a well understood preventable cancer. The rates of cervical cancer are very varied and inversely proportional to effectiveness of disease management policies. Management of cervical cancer includes: prevention, screening, diagnosis and treatment. The main objective of this scoping review is to map evidence on cervical cancer management in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to understand the coverage of cervical cancer prevention and treatment services and provide an opportunity to generate knowledge on risk factors, attitudes and practices extendable globally.Methods and analysisThis review will be guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework recommended for conducting scoping review studies. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Scr) checklist will also be completed to ensure that the review adheres to sound methodological rigour acceptable for scoping review studies. The following electronic databases will be search for potentially eligible articles: PubMed, Ebsco Host, Scopus and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Study screening procedures recommended by Higgins and Deeks will be followed.DiscussionCervical cancer can become a disease of the past with a proper control strategy in place. It is therefore imperative to map available evidence on management of cervical cancer to inform policy and advocacy action. More knowledge on the status quo will guide policy makers in ensuring cancer management guiding policies are formulated/updated/ revised accordingly.Scoping review registration: Not registered with PROSPERO (not needed).Protocol and registration: This scoping review was not registered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document