In vivo kinetics as a sensitive method for testing physiologically intact human recombinant apolipoprotein A-I: comparison of three different expression systems

1997 ◽  
Vol 268 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 41-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hartmut H.-J Schmidt ◽  
Regina E Haas ◽  
Alan Remaley ◽  
Janine Genschel ◽  
Christian P Strassburg ◽  
...  
1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saku ◽  
Von Eckardstein ◽  
Zhang ◽  
Liu ◽  
Jimi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 2170020
Author(s):  
Jing Jin ◽  
Albertus Spenkelink ◽  
Karsten Beekmann ◽  
Marta Baccaro ◽  
Fuguo Xing ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 419-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Ma ◽  
Xue-Ling Liao ◽  
Bin Lou ◽  
Man-Ping Wu

Abstract High density lipoprotein (HDL) binds lipopolysaccharide (LPS or endotoxin) and neutralizes its toxicity. We investigated the function of Apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I), a major apolipoprotein in HDL, in this process. Mouse macrophages were incubated with LPS, LPS+ApoA-I, LPS+ApoA-I+LFF (lipoprotein-free plasma fraction d>1.210 g/ml), LPS+HDL, LPS+HDL+LFF, respectively. MTT method was used to detect the mortality of L-929 cells which were attacked by the release-out cytokines in LPS-activated macrophages. It was found that ApoA-I significantly decreased L-929 cells mortality caused by LPS treatment (LPS vs. LPS+ApoA-I, P<0.05) and this effect became even more significant when LFF was utilized (LPS vs. LPS+ApoA-I+LFF, P<0.01; LPS vs. LPS+HDL+LFF, P<0.01). There was no significant difference between LPS+ApoA-I+LFF and LPS+HDL+LFF treatment, indicating that ApoA-I was the main factor. We also investigated in vivo effects of ApoA-I on mouse mortality rate and survival time after LPS administration. We found that the mortality in LPS+ApoA-I group (20%) and in LPS+ApoA-I+LFF group (10%) was significantly lower than that in LPS group (80%) (P<0.05, P<0.01, respectively); the survival time was (43.20 ± 10.13) h in LPS+ApoA-I group and (46.80 ± 3.79) h in LPS+ApoA-I+LFF group, which were significantly longer than that in LPS group (16.25 ± 17.28) h (P<0.01). We also carried out in vitro binding study to investigate the binding capacity of ApoA-I and ApoA-I+LFF to fluorescence labeled LPS (FITC-LPS). It was shown that both ApoA-I and ApoA-I+LFF could bind with FITC-LPS, however, the binding capacity of ApoA-I+LFF to FITC-LPS (64.47 ± 8.06) was significantly higher than that of ApoA-I alone (24.35 ± 3.70) (P<0.01). The results suggest that: (1) ApoA-I has the ability to bind with and protect against LPS; (2) LFF enhances the effect of ApoA-I; (3) ApoA-I is the major contributor for HDL anti-endotoxin function.


1962 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Young ◽  
John W. Gofman
Keyword(s):  

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 555
Author(s):  
Marilena Vlachou ◽  
Vangelis Karalis

The aim of this study was to develop a new in vitro–in vivo simulation (IVIVS) approach in order to predict the outcome of a bioequivalence study. The predictability of the IVIVS procedure was evaluated through its application in the development process of a new generic product of amlodipine/irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide. The developed IVIVS methodology is composed of three parts: (a) mathematical description of in vitro dissolution profiles, (b) mathematical description of in vivo kinetics, and (c) development of joint in vitro–in vivo simulations. The entire programming was done in MATLAB® and all created scripts were validated through other software. The IVIVS approach can be implemented for any number of subjects, clinical design, variability and can be repeated for thousands of times using Monte Carlo techniques. The probability of success of each scenario is recorded and finally, an overall assessment is made in order to select the most suitable batch. Alternatively, if the IVIVS shows reduced probability of BE success, the R&D department is advised to reformulate the product. In this study, the IVIVS approach predicted successfully the BE outcome of the three drugs. During the development of generics, the IVIVS approach can save time and expenses.


1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 1474-1481
Author(s):  
M G De Sain-Van Der Velden ◽  
D J Reijngoud ◽  
G A Kaysen ◽  
M M Gadellaa ◽  
H Voorbij ◽  
...  

In patients with the nephrotic syndrome, markedly increased levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) concentration have been frequently reported, and it has been suggested that this may contribute to the increased cardiovascular risk in these patients. The mechanism, however, is not clear. In the present study, in vivo fractional synthesis rate of Lp(a) was measured using incorporation of the stable isotope 13C valine. Under steady-state conditions, fractional synthesis rate equals fractional catabolic rate (FCR). FCR of Lp(a) was estimated in five patients with the nephrotic syndrome and compared with five control subjects. The mean plasma Lp(a) concentration in the patients (1749+/-612 mg/L) was higher than in control subjects (553+/-96 mg/L). Two patients were heterozygous for apolipoprotein(a) (range, 19 to 30 kringle IV domains), whereas all control subjects were each homozygous with regard to apolipoprotein(a) phenotype (range, 18 to 28 kringle IV domains). The FCR of Lp(a) was comparable between control subjects (0.072+/-0.032 pools/d) and patients (0.064+/-0.029 pools/d) despite the wide variance in plasma concentration. This suggests that differences in Lp(a) levels are caused by differences in synthesis rate. Indeed, the absolute synthetic rate of Lp(a) correlated directly with plasma Lp(a) concentration (P < 0.0001) in all subjects. The present results demonstrate that increased synthesis, rather than decreased catabolism, causes elevated plasma Lp(a) concentrations in the nephrotic syndrome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document