Quality of life in women at risk for ovarian cancer who have undergone risk-reducing oophorectomy

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Robson ◽  
Martee Hensley ◽  
Richard Barakat ◽  
Carol Brown ◽  
Dennis Chi ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 594-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn Y. Fang ◽  
Carol Cherry ◽  
Karthik Devarajan ◽  
Tianyu Li ◽  
John Malick ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 156 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-139
Author(s):  
Phuong L. Mai ◽  
Helen Q. Huang ◽  
Lari B. Wenzel ◽  
Paul K. Han ◽  
Richard P. Moser ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1029-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trond M. Michelsen ◽  
Anne Dørum ◽  
Claes G. Tropé ◽  
Sophie D. Fosså ◽  
Alv A. Dahl

Background:Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is the safest intervention for prevention of ovarian cancer in women at increased risk for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. Little is known about other effects of RRSO. The objective of this study was to investigate quality of life (QoL) and fatigue in a sample of women who had RRSO for increased cancer risk and to compare the findings with those of age-matched controls from the general population (NORM).Materials and Methods:In a cross-sectional follow-up mailed questionnaire design, 301 (67%) of 450 invited Norwegian women with RRSO attended. The questionnaire contained measures of QoL, fatigue, anxiety/depression, and body image, and questions about demography, lifestyle, and morbidity. The findings were compared with those of the NORM.Results:For RRSO women, mean age at survey was 53.7 years (SD, 9.2), mean age at RRSO was 48.4 years (SD 8.4), and median follow-up time was 5.0 years (range, 1-15 years). No clinically significant differences were observed between RRSO and NORM for any of the QoL or fatigue dimensions. In subgroup analyses of the RRSO group, no clinically significant differences in QoL and fatigue were observed between those who had surgery before or after age 50 years, or between BRCA1/2 carriers and women with unknown mutation statuses. Women who had cancer (32%), however, showed clinically significant lower levels of QoL and more fatigue than women without cancer.Conclusions:Women who had RRSO showed similar levels of QoL and fatigue as NORM. Women who had cancer before RRSO had lower levels of QoL and more fatigue.


2020 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-001541
Author(s):  
Faiza Gaba ◽  
Sadiyah Robbani ◽  
Naveena Singh ◽  
W Glenn McCluggage ◽  
Nafisa Wilkinson ◽  
...  

BackgroundRisk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is the 'gold standard' for preventing tubo-ovarian cancer in women at increased risk. However, when performed in pre-menopausal women, it results in premature menopause and associated detrimental health consequences. This, together with acceptance of the central role of the fallopian tube in etiopathogenesis of high-grade serous carcinoma, by far the most common type of tubo-ovarian cancer, has led to risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy being proposed as a two-step surgical alternative for pre-menopausal women declining/delaying oophorectomy.Primary ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact on sexual function of risk-reducing early salpingectomy, within a two-step, risk-reducing, early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy tubo-ovarian cancer prevention strategy in pre-menopausal women at increased risk of tubo-ovarian cancer.Study HypothesisRisk-reducing early salpingectomy is non-inferior for sexual and endocrine function compared with controls; risk-reducing early salpingectomy is superior for sexual/endocrine function, non-inferior for quality-of-life, and equivalent in satisfaction to the standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.Trial DesignMulti-center, observational cohort trial with three arms: risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy; risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy; controls (no surgery). Consenting individuals undergo an ultrasound, serum CA125, and follicle-stimulating hormone measurements and provide information on medical history, family history, quality-of-life, sexual function, cancer worry, psychological well-being, and satisfaction/regret. Follow-up by questionnaire takes place annually for 3 years. Women receiving risk-reducing early salpingectomy can undergo delayed oophorectomy at a later date of their choosing, or definitely by the menopause.Major Inclusion/Exclusion CriteriaInclusion criteria: pre-menopausal; aged >30 years; at increased risk of tubo-ovarian cancer (mutation carriers or on the basis of a strong family history); completed their family (for surgical arms). Exclusion criteria: post-menopausal; previous bilateral salpingectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; pregnancy; previous tubal/ovarian/peritoneal malignancy; <12 months after cancer treatment; clinical suspicion of tubal/ovarian cancer at baseline.Primary EndpointSexual function measured by validated questionnaires.Sample Size1000 (333 per arm).Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsIt is estimated recruitment will be completed by 2023 and results published by 2027.Trial Registration NumberISRCTN registry: 25 173 360 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN25173360).


1994 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Meden ◽  
A. Metz ◽  
E. Mönkeberg-Tun

2007 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 244-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare Stevinson ◽  
Wylam Faught ◽  
Helen Steed ◽  
Katia Tonkin ◽  
Aliya B. Ladha ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mira Sonneborn-Papakostopoulos ◽  
Clara Dubois ◽  
Viktoria Mathies ◽  
Mara Heß ◽  
Nicole Erickson ◽  
...  

AbstractCancer-related malnutrition has a high prevalence, reduces survival and increases side effects. The aim of this study was to assess oncology outpatients and risk of malnutrition. Reported symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in patients found to be at risk of malnutrition or malnourished were compared to patients without malnutrition. Using a standardized questionnaire, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Quality of Life and the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), patients in an outpatient cancer clinic undergoing chemotherapy treatment at a German University Hospital were assessed for nutrition, risk of malnutrition and quality of life. Based on the MNA, 39 (45.9%) patients were categorized as malnourished or at risk for malnutrition. Loss of appetite (n = 37.6%, p < 0.001) and altered taste sensation (n = 30,3%, p < 0.001) were the symptoms most frequently associated with reduced food intake. Patients with risk of malnutrition scored lower on the global health status (n = 48.15%, p = 0.001). Side effects of cancer treatments lead to a higher risk of malnutrition and as a consequence lower QoL. These side effects should be addressed more efficiently in cancer care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document