scholarly journals Effectiveness of a community-based intervention for people with schizophrenia and their caregivers in India (COPSI): a randomised controlled trial

The Lancet ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 383 (9926) ◽  
pp. 1385-1394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudipto Chatterjee ◽  
Smita Naik ◽  
Sujit John ◽  
Hamid Dabholkar ◽  
Madhumitha Balaji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Randomised Controlled

scholarly journals Community-based intervention to optimise falls risk management: a randomised controlled trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 724-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.M. Ciaschini ◽  
S.E. Straus ◽  
L.R. Dolovich ◽  
R.A. Goeree ◽  
K.M. Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Falls Risk ◽  
Randomised Controlled

scholarly journals Reduction in hospital readmission stay of elderly patients by a community based hospital discharge scheme: a randomised controlled trial.

BMJ ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 297 (6647) ◽  
pp. 544-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Townsend ◽  
M. Piper ◽  
A. O. Frank ◽  
S. Dyer ◽  
W. R. North ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Randomised Controlled

scholarly journals Understanding how a community-based intervention for people with spinal cord injury in Bangladesh was delivered as part of a randomised controlled trial: a process evaluation

Spinal Cord ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 1166-1175
Author(s):  
Hueiming Liu ◽  
Mohammad Sohrab Hossain ◽  
Md. Shofiqul Islam ◽  
Md. Akhlasur Rahman ◽  
Punam D. Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Home Visits ◽  
Case Managers ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Telephone Calls ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Design Mixed methods study Setting Community, Bangladesh Objectives To understand how a community-based intervention for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Bangladesh was delivered as part of a randomised controlled trial and to gauge the perceptions of participants and healthcare professionals to the intervention. Methods A community-based intervention was administered to 204 participants as part of a large randomised controlled trial (called the CIVIC trial). Case-managers followed-up participants with regular telephone calls and home visits over the first 2 years after discharge. The following data were collected alongside the trial: (i) chart audit of telephone calls and home visits (ii) recordings of 20 telephone calls (iii) interviews with 14 Intervention participants and four healthcare professionals including three case-managers. Results Participants received the target number of telephone calls and home visits. Pressure injuries were identified as a problem during at least one telephone call by 43% of participants. Participants and case-managers valued regular telephone calls and home visits, and believed that calls and visits prevented complications and alleviated social isolation. Participants trusted case-managers and were confident in the care and advice provided. Case-managers expressed concerns that people with SCI in Bangladesh face many problems impacting on well-being and motivation stemming from poverty, limited employment opportunities, societal attitudes and inaccessible environments. Conclusion A community-based intervention involving regular telephone calls and home visits was administered as intended and was well received by the recipients of the care. Nonetheless, people with SCI in Bangladesh face economic and social problems which cannot be fully addressed by this type of intervention alone.

scholarly journals Community-based doula support for migrant women during labour and birth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in Stockholm, Sweden (NCT03461640)

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e031290
Author(s):  
Erica Schytt ◽  
Anna Wahlberg ◽  
Amani Eltayb ◽  
Rhonda Small ◽  
Nataliia Tsekhmestruk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Ethical Review ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Migrant Women ◽  
Intrapartum Care ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionMigrant women consistently rate their care during labour and birth more negatively than non-migrant women, due to communication difficulties, lack of familiarity with how care is provided, and discrimination and prejudicial staff attitudes. They also report being left alone, feeling fearful, unsafe and unsupported, and have poorer birth outcomes than non-migrant women. Community-based doulas (CBDs) are bilingual women from migrant communities who are trained in childbirth and labour support, and who facilitate communication between woman-partner-staff during childbirth. This study protocol describes the design, rationale and methods of a randomised controlled trial that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of CBD support for improving the intrapartum care experiences and postnatal well-being of migrant women giving birth in Sweden.Methods and analysisA randomised controlled trial. From six antenatal care clinics in Stockholm, Sweden, we aim to recruit 200 pregnant Somali, Arabic, Polish, Russian and Tigrinya-speaking women who cannot communicate fluently in Swedish, are 18 years or older and with no contraindications for vaginal birth. In addition to standard labour support, women are randomised to CBD support (n=100) or no such support during labour (n=100). Trained CBDs meet with women once or twice before the birth, provide emotional, physical and communication support to women throughout labour and birth in hospital, and then meet with women once or twice after the birth. Women’s ratings of the intrapartum care experiences and postnatal well-being are assessed at 6–8 weeks after the birth using selected questions from the Migrant Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire and by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. The intervention group will be compared with the control group using intention-to-treat analyses. ORs and 95% CIs will be estimated and adjustments made if key participant characteristics differ between trial arms.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm (approval number: 2018/12 - 31/2).Trial registration numberNCT03461640; Pre-results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document