Surgical resection: Is it the preferred treatment for elderly patients with bronchogenic carcinoma

Lung Cancer ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 2 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 94-95
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongfei He ◽  
Tianyi Liang ◽  
Shutian Mo ◽  
Zijun Chen ◽  
Shuqi Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The effect of time delay from diagnosis to surgery on the prognosis of elderly patients with liver cancer is not well known. We investigated the effect of surgical timing on the prognosis of elderly hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing surgical resection and constructed a Nomogram model to predict the overall survival of patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on elderly patients with primary liver cancer after hepatectomy from 2012 to 2018. The effect of surgical timing on the prognosis of elderly patients with liver cancer was analyzed using the cut-off times of 18 days, 30 days, and 60 days. Cox was used to analyze the independent influencing factors of overall survival in patients, and a prognostic model was constructed. Results A total of 232 elderly hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent hepatectomy were enrolled in this study. The cut-off times of 18, 30, and 60 days were used. The duration of surgery had no significant effect on overall survival. Body Mass Index, Child-Pugh classification, Tumor size Max, and Length of stay were independent influencing factors for overall survival in the elderly Liver cancer patients after surgery. These factors combined with Liver cirrhosis and Venous tumor emboli were incorporated into a Nomogram. The nomogram was validated using the clinical data of the study patients, and exhibited better prediction for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival. Conclusions We demonstrated that the operative time has no significant effect on delayed operation in the elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and a moderate delay may benefit some patients. The constructed Nomogram model is a good predictor of overall survival in elderly patients with hepatectomy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-261
Author(s):  
Hyo Jung Kim ◽  
Jae Seon Kim ◽  
Jae Min Lee ◽  
Moon Kyung Joo ◽  
Beom Jae Lee ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 593
Author(s):  
Ville Vasankari ◽  
Roel Hubert Louis Haeren ◽  
Mika Niemela ◽  
Miikka Korja

Background: Can elderly patients with thoracic meningioma and severe paraparesis benefit from delayed surgery? Case Description: Two out of three octogenarians with severe preoperative paraparesis (all wheelchair-bound) were able to walk again following delayed (60–120 days from onset of deficit) surgical resection of thoracic spinal meningiomas. Conclusion: Two out of three octogenarians with thoracic meningiomas causing severe paraparesis benefitted from the delayed (i.e. from 60 to 289 days) surgical resection of their tumors.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeong Min Park ◽  
Sang-Jae Park ◽  
Sung-Sik Han ◽  
Seoung Hoon Kim

Abstract Background We designed a retrospective study to compare prognostic outcomes based on whether or not surgical resection was performed in elderly patients aged(≥75 years) with resectable pancreatic cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 49 patients with resectable pancreatic cancer (surgery group, resection was performed for 38 cases; no surgery group, resection was not performed for 11 cases) diagnosed from January 2003 to December 2014 at the National Cancer Center, Korea. Results There was no significant difference in demographics between the two groups. The surgery group showed significantly better overall survival after diagnosis than the no surgery group (2-year survival rate, 40.7% vs. 0%; log-rank test, p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis revealed that not having undergone surgical resection [hazard ratio (HR) 2.412, P = 0.022] and a high Charlson comorbidity index (HR 5.252, P = 0.014) were independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival in elderly patients with early stage pancreatic cancer. Conclusions In the present study, surgical resection resulted in better prognosis than non-surgical resection for elderly patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Except for patients with a high Charlson comorbidity index, an aggressive surgical approach seems to be beneficial for elderly patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15179-e15179
Author(s):  
Lubina Arjyal ◽  
Amir Bista ◽  
Michael Olayiwola Ojelabi

e15179 Background: For patients with localized colon cancer, surgical resection is the only curative treatment modality. Old age may be an independent factor associated with decreased receipt of surgery. We conducted this study to evaluate the utilization of surgery and its impact on survival in older patients with colon cancer in the United States. Methods: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Database (SEER-18) was utilized to identify elderly patients (≥65 years) diagnosed from 2004-2013 with non-metastatic colon cancer (stage≤ III). Study population was divided into various cohorts based on race (Caucasian, African Americans, others), sex and age (< 80 years and ≥80 years), histology grade, tumor side, and stage. Multivariate logistic regression model was utilized to assess factors associated with receipt of surgery. Kaplan-Meier estimators with the log rank test was used to compare median overall survival (Md OS) between the surgery arm and non-surgery arm. Statistical significance was defined for p < 0.05. Results: Database identified 89,467 patients (54.7% female, 82.7% Caucasian; Median age 77 years). 94.6% (n = 84,656) of patients received surgery. On multivariate-analysis, left sided disease, lower grade tumor, lower stage, female gender, residents of lower median household income county, African Americans and age ≥80 years were less likely to receive surgery. The Md OS in the surgery arm was 87 months vs 69 months for non-surgery arm, p < 0.001. This benefit was seen in all the three stages (stage I: Md OS 104 vs 75 months; stage II: Md OS 88 vs 50 months; stage III: Md OS 74 vs 37 months, p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Additional analysis for octogenarians (age≥ 80 years) showed Md OS of 68 months in the surgery arm vs 48 months in the non-surgery arm, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study showed significant utilization of surgery (94.6%) in elderly patients with localized colon cancer. There is a clear survival benefit to surgery even in patients with age≥ 80 years. Surgical resection with curative intent should be strongly considered in patients with good performance status irrespective of age.


2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii87-iii87
Author(s):  
S. J. Han ◽  
R. A. Morshed ◽  
S. M. Chang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document