A matched case-control study of the relationship between beta-carotene intake and lung cancer

Lung Cancer ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. S235
Author(s):  
Ai-jun Tan ◽  
Shang-pu He ◽  
Ming-xi Huang ◽  
Guo-Guang Li ◽  
Luyuan Shi
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xīn Gào ◽  
Yang Xuan ◽  
Axel Benner ◽  
Ankita Anusruti ◽  
Hermann Brenner ◽  
...  

Studies suggest that nitric oxide (NO) may have a possible role in lung carcinogenesis. This study is aimed to evaluate the association of the NO metabolites, namely, nitrite and nitrate, with lung cancer incidence. We conducted a matched case-control study (n=245 incident lung cancer cases and n=735 controls) based on the German ESTHER cohort (n=9,940). Controls were matched to cases on age, sex, smoking status (never/former/current smoking), and pack-years of smoking. The sum of nitrite and nitrate was measured in urine samples using a colorimetric assay and was standardized for renal function by urinary creatinine. Conditional logistic regression models, adjusted for lifestyle factors, asthma prevalence, and family history of lung cancer, were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Among incident lung cancer cases, high nitrite/nitrate levels were statistically significantly associated with current smoking, a low BMI, and the oxidative stress biomarker 8-isoprostane levels. Nitrite/nitrate levels in the top quintile were statistically significantly associated with lung cancer incidence: the OR (95% CI) was 1.37 (1.04-1.82) for comparison with the bottom quintile. This association was unaltered after additional adjustment for 8-isoprostane levels and C-reactive protein (CRP). In conclusion, this large cohort study suggested that subjects with high urinary nitrite/nitrate concentrations had an increased risk of lung cancer and this association was independent of smoking, CRP, 8-isoprostane levels, and other established lung cancer risk factors. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and to confirm the hypothesis that pathologically high levels of NO are involved in lung cancer development.


2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 567-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Li Lo ◽  
Chin-Fu Hsiao ◽  
Gee-Chen Chang ◽  
Ying-Huang Tsai ◽  
Ming-Shyan Huang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. FSO248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina J Karlin ◽  
Shailja B Amin ◽  
Matthew R Buras ◽  
Heidi E Kosiorek ◽  
Patricia M Verona ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Eung Joo Park ◽  
Hokyou Lee ◽  
Hyeon Chang Kim ◽  
Seung Soo Sheen ◽  
Sang Baek Koh ◽  
...  

Residential radon exposure and cigarette smoking are the two most important risk factors for lung cancer. The combined effects thereof were evaluated in a multi-center matched case-control study in South Korea. A total of 1038 participants were included, comprising 519 non-small cell lung cancer cases and 519 age- and sex- matched community-based controls. Residential radon levels were measured for all participants. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) for lung cancer according to radon exposure (high ≥ 100 Bq/m3 vs. low < 100 Bq/m3), smoking status, and combinations of the two after adjusting for age, sex, indoor hours, and other housing information. The median age of the participants was 64 years, and 51.3% were women. The adjusted ORs (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for high radon and cigarette smoking were 1.56 (1.03–2.37) and 2.53 (1.60–3.99), respectively. When stratified according to combinations of radon exposure and smoking status, the adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for lung cancer in high-radon non-smokers, low-radon smokers, and high-radon smokers were 1.40 (0.81–2.43), 2.42 (1.49–3.92), and 4.27 (2.14–8.52), respectively, with reference to low-radon non-smokers. Both residential radon and cigarette smoking were associated with increased odds for lung cancer, and the difference in ORs according to radon exposure was much greater in smokers than in non-smokers.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eung Joo Park ◽  
Hokyou Lee ◽  
Hyeon Chang Kim ◽  
Seung soo Sheen ◽  
Sang Baek Koh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Residential radon exposure and cigarette smoking are the two most important risk factors for lung cancer. The combined effects thereof were evaluated in a multi-center matched case-control study in South Korea.Methods: A total of 1,038 participants were included, comprising 519 non-small cell lung cancer cases and 519 age- and sex- matched community-based controls. Residential radon levels were measured for all participants. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) for lung cancer according to radon exposure (high ≥100 Bq/m3 vs. low <100 Bq/m3), smoking status, and combinations of the two after adjusting for age, sex, indoor hours, and other housing information.Results: The median age of the participants was 64 years, and 51.3% were women. The adjusted ORs (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for high radon and cigarette smoking were 1.56 (1.03-2.37) and 2.53 (1.60-3.99), respectively. When stratified according to combinations of radon exposure and smoking status, the adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for lung cancer in high-radon non-smokers, low-radon smokers, and high-radon smokers were 1.40 (0.81-2.43), 2.42 (1.49-3.92), and 4.27 (2.14-8.52), respectively, with reference to low-radon non-smokers.Conclusion: Both residential radon and cigarette smoking were associated with increased odds for lung cancer, and the difference in ORs according to radon exposure was much greater in smokers than in non-smokers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document