PP083-MON SIGNIFICANCE OF THE INFLAMMATION-BASED GLASGOW PROGNOSTIC SCORE FOR SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM OUTCOMES AFTER CURATIVE RESECTION OF GASTRIC CANCER

Background/Aims: Identification of nutritional indicators to predict short-term and long-term outcomes is necessary to provide appropriate treatment to patients with gastric cancer. Methods: We designed an analysis of a multicenter dataset of patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy between 2010 and 2014. We enrolled 842 eligible patients who had stage II/III gastric cancer. The area under the curve (AUC) values were compared among prognostic nutritional index (PNI), calculated as 10 × albumin g/dL + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count/mm3, and its constituents, and the predictive value of preoperative PNI for postoperative short-term and long-term outcomes was evaluated. Results: Preoperative PNI exhibited higher AUC values (0.719) for 1-year survival than its constituents, and the optimal cutoff value was 47. The disease-free and overall survival of patients in the PNI-low group were significantly shorter compared with those in the PNI-high group. The prognostic difference between the PNI-high and PNI-low groups was significantly greater in the subgroup of patients who underwent total gastrectomy. Clinically relevant postoperative complications were more frequently observed in the PNI-low group. Conclusions: The preoperative PNI is a useful predictor reflecting the incidence of complications after gastrectomy and the prognosis of patients with stage II/III gastric cancer.

Download Full-text

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to predict the short-term and long-term outcomes of gastric cancer patients.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e15560 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e15560-e15560

Author(s):

Ryoichi Miyamoto ◽

Satoshi Inagawa ◽

Naoki Sano ◽

Sosuke Tadano ◽

Masayoshi Yamamoto

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Perioperative Outcomes ◽

Survival Times ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Short Term ◽

Gastric Cancer Patients

e15560 Background: Preoperative NLR was well known as highly repeatable, cost-effective and widely available long-term postoperative prognostic marker of gastric cancer patients. However, the utility of preoperative NLR to predict short-term outcomes in gastric cancer patients remains unclear. In this study, we addressed whether the preoperative NLR is a predictive value of short-term outcome in gastric cancer patients. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 154 consecutive gastric cancer patients. Mean NLR was calculated, and 3.5 was set as cut-off value. The patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were respectively compared. In addition, median survival times (MSTs) were also compared. In terms of stage II/III (UICC 7th) gastric cancer patients, median disease-free survival times (MDFSTs) were compared between the two groups. Results: The patients were then divided into two groups: low-NLR group (n = 110) and high-NLR group (n = 44). Among low-NLR group and high-NLR group, significant differences were respectively observed in preoperative symptoms [56 (51%) vs. 31 (70%); p = 0.027] and perioperative outcomes including postoperative complications [3 (2.7%) vs. 5 (11.3%); p = 0.015], intraoperative blood loss (158 ± 168 g vs. 232 ± 433 g; p = 0.022), and intraoperative blood transfusion [0 vs. 3 (6.8%); p = 0.042]. MSTs and MDFSTs were significantly differed (812 vs. 594 days; p = 0.04, 848 vs. 475 days; p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: The present study indicated that preoperative NLR influenced not only long-term outcomes but also perioperative outcomes in gastric cancer patients. Preoperative NLR is also a useful predictive value of short-term outcomes in gastric cancer patients.

Download Full-text

Prognostic value of modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ration (NLR) after curative resection for gastric cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.4_suppl.295 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 295-295

Author(s):

Yusuke Shimodaira ◽

Sachie Koike ◽

Yusuke Takahashi ◽

Masao Okada ◽

Kaori Hayashibara ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Prognostic Value ◽

Curative Resection ◽

Prognostic Score ◽

Glasgow Prognostic Score ◽

Rank Test ◽

Independent Predictive Factor ◽

Gastric Cancer Patients

295 Background: Several biomarkers based on serum chemistry have been reported to be associated with the prognosis of several types of cancers. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of preoperative mGPS and NLR after curative resection for gastric cancer. Methods: A total of 295 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for primary gastric cancer at our institution from January 2013 to December 2017 were enrolled in this study. The mGPS was calculated by CRP and Alb using standard thresholds ( > 0.5 mg/dL for CRP and < 3.5 g/dL for Alb). The NLR was defined as absolute neutrophil count divided by absolute lymphocyte count. The survival curves of patients stratified by each parameter were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to select parameters independently correlated with prognosis. Results: The median follow-up time was 36.7 months, and 29 patients died during follow-up. The estimated 5-year survival rate was 83.1%. Results from the univariate analyses showed mGPS2 (CRP > 0.5 mg/dL and Alb < 3.5 g/dL) was associated with poor survival while NLR and NLRc was not (P < 0.001, P = 0.506, and P = 0.423, respectively). In the multivariate analyses, the mGPS2 was identified as an independent predictive factor for OS in gastric cancer patients after curative resection (HR: 2.624; 95% CI: 1.058-6.505; P = 0.037). Conclusions: Preoperative mGPS2 was associated with worse survival after curative resection of gastric cancer patients. Based on our study, those with mPGS2 may be warranted to receive additional therapy or nutritional support to acquire better survival.

Download Full-text