A Novel Preoperative Inflammation Score System Established for Postoperative Prognosis Predicting of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BackgroundInflammation has been implicated in tumorigenesis and has been reported as an important prognostic factor in cancers. In this study, we aimed to develop and validate a novel inflammation score (IFS) system based on 12 inflammatory markers and explore its impact on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) survival after hepatectomy.MethodsClinical data of 446 ICC patients underwent surgical treatment were collected from the Primary Liver Cancer Big Data, and then served as a training cohort to establish the IFS. Furthermore, an internal validation cohort including 175 patients was used as internal validation cohort of the IFS. A survival tree analysis was used to divide ICC patients into three groups (low-, median-, and high- IFS-score groups) according to different IFS values. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to compare the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates among three different groups. Cox regression analyses were applied to explore the independent risk factors influencing OS and RFS.ResultsIn the training cohort, 149 patients were in the low-IFS-score group, 187 in the median-IFS-score group, and 110 in the high-IFS-score group. KM curves showed that the high-IFS-score group had worse OS and RFS rates than those of the low- and median-IFS-score groups (P<0.001) in both the training and validation cohorts. Moreover, multivariable Cox analyses identified high IFS as an independent risk factor for OS and RFS in the training cohort. The area under the curve values for OS prediction of IFS were 0.703 and 0.664 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, which were higher than those of the AJCC 7th edition TNM stage, AJCC 8th edition TNM stage, and the Child-Pugh score. ConclusionsOur results revealed IFS was an independent risk factor for OS and RFS in patients with ICC after hepatectomy and could serve as an effective prognostic prediction system in daily clinical practice.

Prevention of Intra-Abdominal Adhesions Using the Combination of Mediclore® and a Statin

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study investigated the antiadhesive effects of Mediclore®, rosuvastatin, and a combination of Mediclore and rosuvastatin in a rat adhesion model. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The adhesion models (a total of 58 adult male rats) were divided into 4 groups. The control group (group C) received no special materials except for a saline. The experimental groups were treated with 5 mL of Mediclore (group M), rosuvastatin (group R), or rosuvastatin and Mediclore (group RM), and these materials were intraperitoneally placed under the incision. At postoperative day 14, the rats underwent re-laparotomy and adhesiolysis. Three investigators blinded to group assignment scored the extent of adhesion formation, the numbers of remote adhesions, and the extent of acute/chronic inflammation, fibrosis, edema, and congestion on resected specimens via histologic examination. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The macroscopic adhesion score in group RM (7.27 ± 3.51) was significantly lower than those in groups C (13.36 ± 2.24) and R (11.71 ± 1.98); group M (9.13 ± 4.09) had a significantly lower adhesion score than group C. The number of remote adhesions was significantly lower in groups R and RM than in group C. The acute inflammation score, chronic inflammation score, and fibrosis score in group RM; the acute inflammation score in group R; and the fibrosis score in group M were significantly lower than those in group C. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The intraperitoneal application of Mediclore and a combination of Mediclore and rosuvastatin effectively reduced postoperative adhesions.

Comparison of Electrocoagulation Tuboplasty and Continued Medical Therapy for Treating Persistent Eustachian Tube Dysfunction With Hypertrophic Mucosa Disease

Objectives The objective of this trial was to compare outcomes of electrocoagulation tuboplasty and continued medical therapy for treating persistent Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) with hypertrophic mucosa disease in the Eustachian tube (ET) orifice. Study Design Prospective, case-control trial. Material and Methods Patients with persistent ETD were recruited and allocated to electrocoagulation tuboplasty and continued medical therapy groups. The ETD questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) score and objective parameters were compared between the groups at 6 and 12 months. Results The proportion of patients with a decrease in ETDQ-7 scores was greater in the electrocoagulation group than in the medical therapy group at the 6-month follow-up (53.49% and 34.38%, respectively; p = .158), but the difference was not statistically significant. However, at the 12-month follow-up, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients with a decrease in ETDQ-7 scores in the electrocoagulation group (88.37% and 40.63%, respectively; p = .001). Additionally, a significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of the proportion of patients who improved 12 months after the treatment (tympanometry: 72.09% and 9.38%, respectively; p = .001; air-bone gap: 79.07% and 25.00%, respectively; p = .001; tympanic membrane status: 62.79% and 0.00%, respectively). In addition, the proportion of patients with improvements in the ET inflammation score was significantly different between the groups at 6-month (67.44% and 34.38%, respectively; p = .009) and 12-month (93.02% and 34.38%; p = .001) follow-ups. No device- or procedure-related serious adverse events were reported in any patients. Conclusions Electrocoagulation Eustachian tuboplasty appears to be a safe and feasible procedure for adult persistent ETD with hypertrophic mucosa disease in the ET orifice, and is superior to continued medical management alone. The improvements in ETDQ-7 and objective parameters persisted for 12 months.

The diagnostic value of modified systemic ınflammation score in predicting post-operative outcomes of cutaneous melanoma patients who underwent ısolated limb perfusion

Background In-transit metastasis is considered a locoregional disease in cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients. Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is among the treatment options in selected cases. The aim of this study was to determine the success of pre- and post-perfusion mSIS values in predicting the potential complications and the prognosis of the disease by investigating the early and long-term results of mSIS values calculated before and after ILP in CM cases with in-transit metastases. Materials and methods Patients who underwent ILP within the period from 2014 to 2020 in our department were retrospectively scanned. A total of 20 patients were found to undergo ILP. The scores obtained from modified inflammation score (mSIS) were formulated according to albumin (Alb) and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) scores. Results The mean follow-up time was 20.47 months. Complications requiring surgical intervention developed in three patients. According to the Wieberdink local toxicity classification, the majority (70%) of the patients were found to be grade II. Based on pre-perfusion mSIS values, 8 patients were classified as mSIS 0 while six patients were classified as mSIS 1 and 2. Based on post-perfusion mSIS values, 14 patients and one patient were classified as mSIS 2 (70%) and mSIS 0, respectively. Accordingly, univariate analysis showed that mSIS 1 and mSIS 2 were negative prognostic factors for mean survival in the pre-perfusion period (HR 0.162, 95% CI 0.036–0.729; p = 0.018 and HR: 0.223, 95% CI 0.049–1.019; p = 0.053) whereas albumin (Alb) and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) were not independent prognostic factors for mean survival. Conclusion The mSIS values calculated in the pre-perfusion period can give an opinion about the OS of the patients whereas post-perfusion mSIS values may predict potential surgical complications and local toxicities.

Validity of Thai Nutritional Assessment Form and Nutrition Triage 2013 to Diagnose Malnutrition in Non-Dialytic Chronic Kidney Disease

Background: Malnutrition inflammation score (MIS) is a universal tool to assess the presence of malnutrition among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). An appropriate diagnosis coding for malnutrition affects hospital reimbursement in Thailand. The Nutrition Alert Form (NAF) and the Nutritional Triage (NT-2013) have been approved as standard nutrition assessment tools for general populations. Objective: To study the validity of the NAF and the NT-2013 among patients with MIS at non-dialytic CKD stages 3 to 5. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among the patients with non-dialytic CKD stages 3 to 5. NAF, NT-2013, and MIS nutritional assessment tools were performed in all subjects. Cohen’s kappa statistics and Pearson’s correlation were used to determine the validity of NAF and NT-2013. Results: Two hundred seven participants were included in the present study. According to the MIS assessment classification, normal to mild, moderate, and severe malnutrition were diagnosed in 59.9%, 34.8%, and 5.3%, respectively. The correlation between NAF and NT-2013 when compared with MIS were r=0.619 and r=0.689 (p<0.001), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of assessment score to diagnose moderate to severe malnutrition were 47.6, 75.9, and 0.698 (95% CI 0.628 to 0.768) in NAF score greater than 5, and 100, 3.6, and 0.707 (95% CI 0.637 to 0.777) in NT-2013 score greater than 7, respectively. Conclusion: Among patients with CKD stages 3 to 5, the nutritional assessment tool NAF and NT-2013 correlated well with MIS. It seemed that NAF score is an alternative nutritional assessment tool with moderate sensitivity and specificity test, and NT-2013 score is suitable for a screening nutritional assessments tool to identify malnutrition with high sensitivity but very low specificity in a CKD population. Keywords: Nutritional assessment form (NAF); Nutritional Triage 2013 (NT-2013); Malnutrition inflammation score (MIS); Chronic kidney disease

Modified Systemic Inflammation Score Is an Independent Predictor of Long-Term Outcome in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction

Background: The modified systemic inflammation score (mSIS), which is calculated by a composite score of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and the albumin content in serum, is identified as the new score to predict the prognosis for various cancers. However, its significance for patients with adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEJ), who receive surgery, remains unclear.Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 317 patients with AEJ receiving surgery between September 2010 and December 2016. The associations between the mSIS and the clinicopathological features, overall survival (OS), as well as relapse-free survival (RFS), were assessed. In addition, the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (t-ROC) curve analysis was performed for comparing the value of those scoring systems in predicting patient prognosis.Results: Of the 317 cases, 119 were rated as mSIS 0, 123 as mSIS 1, and 75 as mSIS 2. Besides, mSIS was significantly related to age and tumor size. On multivariate analysis, mSIS was identified as a predictor to independently predict OS (p &lt; 0.001) along with RFS (p &lt; 0.001), and a significantly strong correlation was observed at the advanced pTNM stages based on the mSIS system. In the subgroup analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery alone, mSIS was still the predictor for independently predicting patient OS (p &lt; 0.001) together with RFS (p &lt; 0.001) for the two groups. T-ROC analysis showed that mSIS was more accurate than controlling nutritional status score in predicting OS and RFS.Conclusions: The mSIS can serve as an easy, useful scoring system to independently predict the preoperative survival for AEJ cases undergoing surgery.

Association of Dietary and Lifestyle Inflammation Score With Metabolic Syndrome in a Sample of Iranian Adults

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the association between the dietary and lifestyle inflammation score (DLIS) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components in a sample of Iranian adults.Design: Population-based cross-sectional study.Setting: General adult population living in Tehran, Iran.Subjects: We included 827 adult men and women with an age range of 18–59 years who were referred to health centers in different districts of Tehran, Iran. Dietary intake was assessed by a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire with 168 items. The DLIS was calculated based on four components, including dietary inflammation score, physical activity, cigarette smoking, and general obesity. Higher DLIS represents a more proinflammatory diet and lifestyle. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the MetS across quartiles of the DLIS was calculated by using logistic regression analysis, controlling for age, sex, energy intake, marital status, education status, and occupation.Results: A total of 827 participants (31% men) were included, with a mean age of 44.7 ± 10.7 years. The prevalence of the MetS was 30.5%. The DLIS ranged between −2.35 and +3.19 (mean ± SD: 0.54 ± 1.09). There was a significant positive association between the DLIS and odds of MetS (OR fourthvs.thefirstquartile: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.01–2.45) in the fully adjusted model.Conclusion: Our results showed a significant positive association between the DLIS and odds of MetS. The results of the present crosssectional study suggested that having a more proinflammatory lifestyle can be associated with MetS. More prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings.