A note on the use of a single inequality index in testing the effect of income distribution on mortality

2002 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 1561-1570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey Laporte
1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Αλεξάνδρα Λειβαδά

THIS THESIS EXAMINES MACROECONOMIC AND MICROECONOMIC ASPECTS OF INCOME INEQUALITY IN GREECE DURING THE PERIOD 1959-1982. THE MACROECONOMIC ASPECTS ARE CONCERNED WITH THE TREND AND CYCLES OF INCOME DISTRIBUTION. THE MICROECONOMIC ASPECTS ARE RELATED TO THE DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACT OF HOUSEHOLD'S INFLATION RATES. A BROAD SET OF SUMMARY AND DISAGGREGATED INEQUALITY MEASURES IS COMPUTED FOR THE FORMER PURPOSE USING REPORTED INCOME DATA FROM TAX DECLARATIONS. THERE IS A DISCREPANCY IN THE SUGGESTED INEQUALITY TREND DUE TO INTERSECTING LORENZ CURVES AND THE PROPERTIES SATISFIED BY EACH INEQUALITY INDEX. ALSO, THE 1981-82 HOUSEHOLD EXENDITURE SURVEY DATA ARE USED TO CALCULATE THE DISTRIBUTION RATES ACROSS HOUSEHOLDS.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 12-20
Author(s):  
Bijan Bidabad

Different ways have been proposed to measure income inequality; there is no best way to calculate the inequality index that expresses income distribution as it is. Popular inequality indices provide information about some points on the distribution function and analyze the inequality of income without reference to the amount of the budget needed to improve the income distribution. In this paper, we propose a set of “Deciles Implied Inequality Indices”. By using this index, we can show how much transfer payment is needed as a redistribution policy to achieve a desired income distribution consistent with the perceived economic goals of the society. That is, we try to find a fiscal-compensation-based index for reducing inequality. By using “Deciles Implied Inequality Indices”, we may measure how much income (tax and subsidy) may be redistributed to reach the targeted income distribution policy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (314) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
Germán Alarco Tosoni ◽  
César Castillo García

<p>Construimos un índice de desigualdad considerando la distribución de la riqueza, la distribución factorial y la distribución personal del ingreso. Con este indicador de dos o tres componentes estimamos y analizamos los resultados para las diferentes economías de América Latina y la región en su conjunto entre 1980 y 2016. Asimismo, determinamos la dispersión entre los diferentes componentes del indicador. Por último, evaluamos la vinculación entre el crecimiento económico y el indicador de desigualdad mediante un análisis econométrico por economía con base en mínimos cuadrados ordinarios (MCO) y en un panel dinámico para toda la región utilizando el método de Arellano Bond. Los coeficientes para toda la región tienen signo negativo reflejando que a mayor desigualdad la variación porcentual del producto interno bruto (PIB) es menor o a menor desigualdad el producto aumenta.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p align="center">INEQUALITY INDEX AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN LATIN AMERICA</p><p align="center"><strong>ABSTRACT</strong><strong></strong></p>The paper presents an inequality composite index of three components: wealth distribution, factorial income distribution and personal income distribution. This index allows us to analyze different results for the various Latin American economies and for the region as whole in the period 1980-2016. In addition, the paper assesses a dispersion analysis for each of the index components. Finally, we evaluate the effects of the inequality index on economic growth for each Latin American economy by using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and dynamic panel data models. The negative coefficient for the entire region shows that the greater (lower) social inequality, the lower (greater) the percentage variation of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-195

Fairness in income distribution is a factor that both motivates employees and contributes to maintaining social stability. In Vietnam, fair income distribution has been studied from various perspectives. In this article, through the analysis and synthesis of related documents and evidence, and from the perspective of economic philosophy, the author applies John Rawls’s Theory of Justice as Fairness to analyze some issues arising from the implementation of the state’s role in ensuring fair income distribution from 1986 to present. These are unifying the perception of fairness in income distribution; solving the relationship between economic efficiency and social equality; ensuring benefits for the least-privileged people in society; and controlling income. On that basis, the author makes some recommendations to enhance the state’s role in ensuring fair income distribution in Vietnam. Received 11thNovember 2019; Revised 10thApril 2020; Accepted 20th April 2020


2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agustín Escobar Latapi

Although the migration – development nexus is widely recognized as a complex one, it is generally thought that there is a relationship between poverty and emigration, and that remittances lessen inequality. On the basis of Latin American and Mexican data, this chapter intends to show that for Mexico, the exchange of migrants for remittances is among the lowest in Latin America, that extreme poor Mexicans don't migrate although the moderately poor do, that remittances have a small, non-significant impact on the most widely used inequality index of all households and a very large one on the inequality index of remittance-receiving households, and finally that, to Mexican households, the opportunity cost of international migration is higher than remittance income. In summary, there is a relationship between poverty and migration (and vice versa), but this relationship is far from linear, and in some respects may be a perverse one for Mexico and for Mexican households.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Feigenbaum ◽  
Price Fishback ◽  
Keoka Grayson

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Latife Sinem Sarul ◽  
Özge Eren

Gender Inequality Index is a major indicator presenting level of development of the countries as Human Development Index, which is calculated regularly every year by UN. In this study, an alternative calculation has been proposed for measuring gender inequality index which is an important barrier for the human development. Each indicator in the index integrated as MAUT- AHP and also AHP-TOPSIS and these methods carried out again for the alternative ranking member and candidate countries of the European Union. The main objective here is to represent that the indicators form gender inequality index can be reclassified with different weights for each indicator.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document