Early decompressive craniectomy after severe head injury: Follow-up and outcome

1997 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. S17
Author(s):  
S.-A. May ◽  
J. Hampl ◽  
C. Bonk ◽  
S. Adam ◽  
M. Ragaller ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Pérez Suárez ◽  
Ana Serrano González ◽  
Carlos Pérez Díaz ◽  
Alberto García Salido ◽  
Amelia Martínez de Azagra Garde ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  

There have been a few case reports of head injury leading to brain tumour development in the same region as the brain injury. Here we report a case where the patient suffered a severe head injury with contusion. He recovered clinically with conservative management. Follow up Computed Tomography scan of the brain a month later showed complete resolution of the lesion. He subsequently developed malignant brain tumour in the same region as the original contusion within a very short period of 15 months. Head injury patients need close follow up especially when severe. The link between severity of head injury and malignant brain tumour development needs further evaluation. Role of anti-inflammatory agents for prevention of post traumatic brain tumours needs further exploration.


Brain Injury ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Lannoo ◽  
F. Colardyn ◽  
C. Jannes ◽  
G. de Soete

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482095146
Author(s):  
Nasim Ahmed ◽  
Patricia Greenberg ◽  
SeungHoon Shin

Background The purpose of the study is to evaluate the in-hospital mortality of patients who presented with acute subdural hematoma (SDH) and underwent emergency decompressive craniectomy (DC) or craniotomy (CO) within 4 hours of hospital arrival. Method The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) dataset of the calendar year of 2007 through 2010 was accessed for the study. All blunt severe head injury patients who presented with acute SDH were included in the study. Severe head injury is defined as a head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score ≥3 and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤8. Univariate followed by propensity-matched analyses were performed to compare the two procedure groups: DC and CO. Results Out of 2370 patients, 518, (21.9%) patients underwent DC. There were significant differences found in the univariate analysis between the DC and CO groups for median age (38 (IQR: 22.0, 55.0) vs 49 (IQR: 27, 67), P < .001), mechanism of injury (fall: 33.2% vs 50.7%; motor vehicle crashes: 58.3% vs 40.9%, P < .001), and median injury severity score (ISS: 26.0 (IQR: 25, 38) vs 26 (IQR: 25.0, 33.0), P < .001). After propensity score matching and pair-matched analysis, no differences were found with any of the above characteristics. The pair-matched analysis also showed no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (42.7% vs 37.5%, P = .10) between the DC vs CO groups. Conclusion The overall in-hospital mortality for emergency CO or DC for the evacuation of SDH remains high. The preference of one operative procedure over the other did not impact overall mortality.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amel Daboussi ◽  
Vincent Minville ◽  
Sophie Leclerc-Foucras ◽  
Thomas Geeraerts ◽  
Jean Paul Esquerré ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasia Tasiou ◽  
Konstantinos Vagkopoulos ◽  
Iordanis Georgiadis ◽  
Alexandros G. Brotis ◽  
Haralampos Gatos ◽  
...  

Brain Injury ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Dikmen ◽  
J. Machamer ◽  
N. Temkin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document