Sleep in Critically Ill Chemically Paralyzed Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation

Abstract Background Although several international guidelines recommend early over late intubation of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), this issue is still controversial. We aimed to investigate the effect (if any) of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 by carrying out a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched, while references and preprint servers were explored, for relevant articles up to December 26, 2020, to identify studies which reported on mortality and/or morbidity of patients with COVID-19 undergoing early versus late intubation. “Early” was defined as intubation within 24 h from intensive care unit (ICU) admission, while “late” as intubation at any time after 24 h of ICU admission. All-cause mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) were the primary outcomes of the meta-analysis. Pooled risk ratio (RR), pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020222147). Results A total of 12 studies, involving 8944 critically ill patients with COVID-19, were included. There was no statistically detectable difference on all-cause mortality between patients undergoing early versus late intubation (3981 deaths; 45.4% versus 39.1%; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99–1.15, p = 0.08). This was also the case for duration of MV (1892 patients; MD − 0.58 days, 95% CI − 3.06 to 1.89 days, p = 0.65). In a sensitivity analysis using an alternate definition of early/late intubation, intubation without versus with a prior trial of high-flow nasal cannula or noninvasive mechanical ventilation was still not associated with a statistically detectable difference on all-cause mortality (1128 deaths; 48.9% versus 42.5%; RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.99–1.25, p = 0.08). Conclusions The synthesized evidence suggests that timing of intubation may have no effect on mortality and morbidity of critically ill patients with COVID-19. These results might justify a wait-and-see approach, which may lead to fewer intubations. Relevant guidelines may therefore need to be updated.

Download Full-text

Effectiveness of anaesthesia ventilator use for mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients during the COVID-19 pandemic

British Journal of Anaesthesia ◽

10.1016/j.bja.2021.04.001 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Aurélie GOUEL-CHERON ◽

Yoann ELMALEH ◽

Camille COUFFIGNAL ◽

Elie KANTOR ◽

Simon MESLIN ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients

Download Full-text

Etiology, incidence, and outcomes of patient–ventilator asynchrony in critically-ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-90013-z ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Yongfang Zhou ◽

Steven R. Holets ◽

Man Li ◽

Gustavo A. Cortes-Puentes ◽

Todd J. Meyer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Surgical Intensive Care ◽

Mechanically Ventilated ◽

History Of ◽

Training Background ◽

The Relationship

AbstractPatient–ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is commonly encountered during mechanical ventilation of critically ill patients. Estimates of PVA incidence vary widely. Type, risk factors, and consequences of PVA remain unclear. We aimed to measure the incidence and identify types of PVA, characterize risk factors for development, and explore the relationship between PVA and outcome among critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients admitted to medical, surgical, and medical-surgical intensive care units in a large academic institution staffed with varying provider training background. A single center, retrospective cohort study of all adult critically ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation for ≥ 12 h. A total of 676 patients who underwent 696 episodes of mechanical ventilation were included. Overall PVA occurred in 170 (24%) episodes. Double triggering 92(13%) was most common, followed by flow starvation 73(10%). A history of smoking, and pneumonia, sepsis, or ARDS were risk factors for overall PVA and double triggering (all P < 0.05). Compared with volume targeted ventilation, pressure targeted ventilation decreased the occurrence of events (all P < 0.01). During volume controlled synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure targeted ventilation, ventilator settings were associated with the incidence of overall PVA. The number of overall PVA, as well as double triggering and flow starvation specifically, were associated with worse outcomes and fewer hospital-free days (all P < 0.01). Double triggering and flow starvation are the most common PVA among critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. Overall incidence as well as double triggering and flow starvation PVA specifically, portend worse outcome.

Download Full-text

Selection strategy for sedation depth in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making ◽

10.1186/s12911-021-01452-7 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (S2) ◽

Author(s):

Longxiang Su ◽

Chun Liu ◽

Fengxiang Chang ◽

Bo Tang ◽

Lin Han ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Dimensionality Reduction ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Latent Profile Analysis ◽

Profile Analysis ◽

Mechanically Ventilated ◽

Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽

Sedation And Analgesia ◽

Ventilated Patients

Abstract Background Analgesia and sedation therapy are commonly used for critically ill patients, especially mechanically ventilated patients. From the initial nonsedation programs to deep sedation and then to on-demand sedation, the understanding of sedation therapy continues to deepen. However, according to different patient’s condition, understanding the individual patient’s depth of sedation needs remains unclear. Methods The public open source critical illness database Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III was used in this study. Latent profile analysis was used as a clustering method to classify mechanically ventilated patients based on 36 variables. Principal component analysis dimensionality reduction was used to select the most influential variables. The ROC curve was used to evaluate the classification accuracy of the model. Results Based on 36 characteristic variables, we divided patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and sedation and analgesia into two categories with different mortality rates, then further reduced the dimensionality of the data and obtained the 9 variables that had the greatest impact on classification, most of which were ventilator parameters. According to the Richmond-ASS scores, the two phenotypes of patients had different degrees of sedation and analgesia, and the corresponding ventilator parameters were also significantly different. We divided the validation cohort into three different levels of sedation, revealing that patients with high ventilator conditions needed a deeper level of sedation, while patients with low ventilator conditions required reduction in the depth of sedation as soon as possible to promote recovery and avoid reinjury. Conclusion Through latent profile analysis and dimensionality reduction, we divided patients treated with mechanical ventilation and sedation and analgesia into two categories with different mortalities and obtained 9 variables that had the greatest impact on classification, which revealed that the depth of sedation was limited by the condition of the respiratory system.

Download Full-text

Tips and Pearls for Tracheostomy during the Covid-19 Pandemic

International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology ◽

10.1055/s-0041-1731723 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 25 (03) ◽

pp. e459-e462

Author(s):

Darwin Kaushal ◽

Shilpa Goyal ◽

Nithin Prakasan Nair ◽

Kapil Soni ◽

Bikram Choudhury ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Present Article ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Current Literature ◽

Literature Search ◽

Scientific Evidence ◽

Early Tracheostomy ◽

Life Saving ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Elective Tracheostomy

AbstractThe number of critically-ill coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) patients requiring mechanical ventilation is on the rise. Most guidelines suggest keeping the patient intubated and delay elective tracheostomy. Although the current literature does not support early tracheostomy, the number of patients undergoing it is increasing. During the pandemic, it is important that surgeons and anesthesiologists know the different aspects of tracheostomy in terms of indication, procedure, tube care and complications. A literature search was performed to identify different guidelines and available evidence on tracheostomy in Covid-19 patients. The purpose of the present article is to generate an essential scientific evidence for life-saving tracheostomy procedures.

Download Full-text

Tuck and Turn: A Protocol for Prone Positioning of Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 on Mechanical Ventilation

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ◽

10.1016/j.apmr.2020.10.084 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 101 (12) ◽

pp. e153

Author(s):

Jamie Savitzky ◽

Talia Rothfus ◽

Sally Wong ◽

Kristina Fusco ◽

Caitlin Hynes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Prone Positioning

Download Full-text

Impact of dexamethasone on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and blood stream infections in COVID-19 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation: a multicenter retrospective study

Annals of Intensive Care ◽

10.1186/s13613-021-00876-8 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Ines Gragueb-Chatti ◽

Alexandre Lopez ◽

Dany Hamidi ◽

Christophe Guervilly ◽

Anderson Loundou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Retrospective Study ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Blood Stream ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽

Blood Stream Infections ◽

Second Wave

Abstract Background Dexamethasone decreases mortality in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has become the standard of care during the second wave of pandemic. Dexamethasone is an immunosuppressive treatment potentially increasing the risk of secondary hospital acquired infections in critically ill patients. We conducted an observational retrospective study in three French intensive care units (ICUs) comparing the first and second waves of pandemic to investigate the role of dexamethasone in the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and blood stream infections (BSI). Patients admitted from March to November 2020 with a documented COVID-19 and requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) for ≥ 48 h were included. The main study outcomes were the incidence of VAP and BSI according to the use of dexamethasone. Secondary outcomes were the ventilator-free days (VFD) at day-28 and day-60, ICU and hospital length of stay and mortality. Results Among the 151 patients included, 84 received dexamethasone, all but one during the second wave. VAP occurred in 63% of patients treated with dexamethasone (DEXA+) and 57% in those not receiving dexamethasone (DEXA−) (p = 0.43). The cumulative incidence of VAP, considering death, duration of MV and late immunosuppression as competing factors was not different between groups (p = 0.59). A multivariate analysis did not identify dexamethasone as an independent risk factor for VAP occurrence. The occurrence of BSI was not different between groups (29 vs. 30%; p = 0.86). DEXA+ patients had more VFD at day-28 (9 (0–21) vs. 0 (0–11) days; p = 0.009) and a reduced ICU length of stay (20 (11–44) vs. 32 (17–46) days; p = 0.01). Mortality did not differ between groups. Conclusions In this cohort of COVID-19 patients requiring invasive MV, dexamethasone was not associated with an increased incidence of VAP or BSI. Dexamethasone might not explain the high rates of VAP and BSI observed in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Download Full-text