431 POSTER Differences in optimal time of debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients after taxane- or nontaxane-containing regimens

2006 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S127-S128
Author(s):  
A. Kedrova ◽  
V. Kuznetsov ◽  
O. Streltsova
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Debulking Surgery

scholarly journals Survey on the current gynaecological approach of ovarian cancer patients: The utility of HIPEC

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Iavazzo ◽  
Alexandros Fotiou ◽  
M. Tsiatas ◽  
Athina Christopoulou ◽  
John Spiliotis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Current Management ◽  
Medical Oncologists ◽  
Interval Debulking Surgery

AbstractBackgroundThe aim of this survey was to acquire an overview of the current management of ovarian cancer with an emphasis on the utility of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).Methods: An email was sent to Oncologists prior to PSOGI International Symposium on Advanced Ovarian Cancer, Athens 11–13 April 2019. Doctors submitted responses on the relevant website. The self-report survey contained 17 questions.ResultsIn total, 467 Medical Oncologists, Surgical Oncologists or Gynaecologic Oncologists were participated and answered to this survey. The resectability of disease was evaluated by laparoscopy from 48.5% of the participants, while 51.5% answered that they stage their patients pre-surgically with the use of CT or MRI. The preferred first intervention in advanced ovarian cancer patients is the neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (72%). Regarding the use of HIPEC, almost half of the participants answered that there is role of HIPEC use in ovarian cancer patients undergoing interval debulking surgery, while almost 70% answered positively about the utility of HIPEC use in ovarian cancer recurrence. As for the role of lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer patients, half of the responders answered negatively. Finally, only 25% of the participants responded that they always check the BRCA status of their ovarian cancer patients, despite the possible differentiation of treatment based on the molecular profiling (80%).ConclusionsThe results of this survey indicate the utility of HIPEC in treatment of ovarian cancer patients and the differences in the overall management of ovarian cancer patients in the current clinical practice.

Efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer patients after non-optimal debulking.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18066-e18066
Author(s):  
Alexey Rumyantsev ◽  
Alexandra Tyulyandina ◽  
Ilya Pokataev ◽  
Konstantin Morkhov ◽  
Valentina Mikhailovna Nechuskina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Severe Neutropenia ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
Optimal Debulking

e18066 Background: Patients with advanced ovarian cancer have unfavorable prognosis after primary debulking surgery if the size of residual tumor exceeds 1 cm. The optimal approaches to systemic treatment of these patients remain unknown. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of dose-dose chemotherapy in frontline treatment of ovarian cancer patients after upfront non-optimal debulking surgery. Methods: This was a non-randomized single-arm phase II trial. We enrolled patients with advanced (FIGO III-IV) epithelial ovarian who underwent non-optimal upfront debulking surgery with residual tumor size > 10 mm. All patients were treated with dose-dense chemotherapy (ie, paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 day 1, 8, 15 + carboplatin AUC6 day 1, cycled every 21 days – 6 cycles). Patients in historical control arm received standard chemotherapy with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 day 1 + carboplatin AUC6 day 1, cycled every 21 days – 6 cycles. No patient in experimental or control arm received front-line bevacizumab or PARP inhibitors. The primary endpoint of the trial was progression-free survival (PFS). According to the historical data of our department, 1-year PFS in this category of patients equals to 51%. To increase 1-year PFS to 70%, 40 patients should be enrolled with α = 0.05 and β = 0.20 and estimated data loss for 10% of patients. Results: The study enrolled 40 patients to dose-dense chemotherapy arm, control arm included 86 patients. The trial arms were balanced in terms of age, performance status and other characteristics. Median follow-up was 28.8 months. The 1-year PFS was 76.9% compared to 51% in historical arm, median PFS was 19.8 months and 12 months respectively (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.39-0.95; p = 0,03). The 1-year overall survival rate was 92.3% with median OS not reached with specified follow-up period. Severe neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia was observed in 82.1%, 53.8%, 15.3% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: The results of the study showed high efficacy of dose-dose chemotherapy as front line of treatment for advanced ovarian cancer patients after non-optimal upfront debulking surgery but one should consider high toxicity of this regimen.

The evaluation of intra- and postoperative complications related to debulking surgery with bowel resection in patients with FIGO stage III–IV ovarian cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 993-997 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bidzinski ◽  
P. Derlatka ◽  
P. Kubik ◽  
I. Ziolkowska-Seta ◽  
A. Dańska-Bidzinska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Bowel Resection ◽  
Intestinal Resection ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Hartmann’S Procedure ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Hartmann's Procedure

The surgical treatment of advanced ovarian cancer is based on the maximal debulking with widening the operation range to the infiltrated organs. The aims are as follows: (1) the assessment of the quantity and quality of intra- and postoperative complications in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in which partial bowel resection was performed and (2) the evaluation of intra- and postoperative complications related to surgery with bowel resection and anastomosis, compared to Hartmann's procedure. The analysis of debulking procedures with intestinal resection and postoperative period in 39 ovarian cancer patients, FIGO stage III–IV, was performed. During 39 operations, the most frequent type of resection was the sigmoidectomy or proctosigmoidectomy (29 patients). In the remaining patients, left- and right-side hemicolectomy or partial enterectomy was done. Twenty-four anastomosis and 15 Hartmann's procedures were performed. There were no differences between surgery with anastomosis and Hartmann's procedure in aspect of quantity of complications, blood loss, and the time of surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in overall survival and progression-free survival in both groups. We conclude that the percentage of complications related to debulking surgery with intestinal resection in advanced ovarian cancer patients might be accepted. The quantity of complications related to surgery with anastomosis and to Hartmann's procedure is similar. If possible, the surgery with anastomosis should be performed.

Should laparoscopy be included in the work-up of advanced ovarian cancer patients attempting interval debulking surgery?

2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Fagotti ◽  
F. Fanfani ◽  
G. Vizzielli ◽  
V. Gallotta ◽  
A. Ercoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Interval Debulking Surgery ◽  
Work Up

ATL

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1395-1400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vilius Rudaitis ◽  
Tadas Zvirblis ◽  
Daiva Kanopiene ◽  
Dovile Janulynaite ◽  
Laimonas Griskevicius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to explore BRCA mutation frequency and to evaluate its impact on prognosis of advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients treated with debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy.MethodsPatients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer were enrolled in a prospective, single-center study from September 2008 to December 2011. All cases were screened for BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations. Progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and BRCA1/2 wild-type patients.ResultsOne hundred seven patients were enrolled and screened for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations; 51.4% patients were positive for BRCA1/2 gene mutation, 63.6% of which carried a single Baltic mutation, and 98.2% of them had serous histology. Older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.032; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.010–1.055; P = 0.0047), nonoptimal cytoreduction (HR, 3.170; 95% CI, 1.986–5.060; P < 0.0001), and BRCA1/2 wild type (HR, 1.625 [1.003–2.632]; P = 0.0486) were significantly associated with shorter PFS in multivariate Cox regression analysis. Only the nonoptimal cytoreduction was a statistically significant risk factor for shorter overall survival (HR, 2.684; 95% CI, 1.264–5.701; P= 0.0102).ConclusionsAdvanced ovarian cancer patients harboring BRCA1/2 mutation treated with debulking surgery and platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy have a longer PFS.

scholarly journals Choosing the right timing for interval debulking surgery and perioperative chemotherapy may improve the prognosis of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dengfeng Wang ◽  
Guonan Zhang ◽  
Chunrong Peng ◽  
Yu Shi ◽  
Xunwei Shi
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Postoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Interval Debulking Surgery

Abstract Background Primary debulking surgery (PDS) is the main treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is for bulky stage III-IV patients who are poor surgical candidates and/or for whom there is a low likelihood of optimal cytoreduction. NACT can increase the rate of complete cytoreduction, but this advantage has not translated to an improvement in survival. Therefore, we aimed to identify factors associated with the survival of patients who received NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Methods A retrospective study was conducted in FIGO stage IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer patients who underwent PDS or IDS in our center between January 1st, 2013, and December 31st, 2018. Results A total of 273 cases were included, of whom 20 were lost to follow-up. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the IDS and PDS groups were found to be similar, although the proportion of patients in stage IV and serum carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) levels before treatment in the IDS group were significantly higher than that in the PDS group. Body mass index (BMI), CA125 level before IDS, residual disease after surgery, and the interval between preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy were all found to be independent prognostic factors for PFS; FIGO stage, residual disease after surgery, and CA125 level before IDS were independent prognostic factors for OS. We found that PFS and OS were both significantly longer in patients with normal CA125 levels before IDS and when the interval between preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy was < 35.5 days (IDS-3 group) than for patients in the PDS group. Conclusions The results suggested the importance of timely IDS and postoperative chemotherapy and potentially allowed the identification of patients who would benefit the most from NACT. Normal CA125 levels before IDS and an interval between preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy no longer than 5 weeks were associated with improved prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document