A short-term cognitive behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa including brief hospitalisation

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 405-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Léonard ◽  
C Mirabel-Sarron ◽  
C Foulon ◽  
J-C Melchior ◽  
D Rigaud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Intake ◽  
Bulimia Nervosa ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Eating Behaviour ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Psychiatric Ward ◽  
Metabolic Study ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Meal Intake ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

SummaryThis was a metabolic study of bulimia nervosa required to design short-term cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) beginning with a brief admission to a psychiatric ward. The treatment produced significant improvements in eating behaviour and results are compared with those of previously published studies. The comparisons do not suggest that brief admission at the onset of therapy might enhance its effectiveness. In other respects, increase in normal meal intake was found to correlate significantly with decrease in hinging. This supports the notion that appropriate food intake at meal times should be an important issue in CBT for bulimia nervosa.

scholarly journals Stepped care and cognitive–behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa: randomised trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 198 (5) ◽  
pp. 391-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Mitchell ◽  
Stewart Agras ◽  
Scott Crow ◽  
Katherine Halmi ◽  
Christopher G. Fairburn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bulimia Nervosa ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Relative Effectiveness ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Individual Therapy ◽  
Stepped Care ◽  
Self Help ◽  
Treatment Conditions ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

BackgroundThis study compared the best available treatment for bulimia nervosa, cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) augmented by fluoxetine if indicated, with a stepped-care treatment approach in order to enhance treatment effectiveness.AimsTo establish the relative effectiveness of these two approaches.MethodThis was a randomised trial conducted at four clinical centres (Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT00733525). A total of 293 participants with bulimia nervosa were randomised to one of two treatment conditions: manual-based CBT delivered in an individual therapy format involving 20 sessions over 18 weeks and participants who were predicted to be non-responders after 6 sessions of CBT had fluoxetine added to treatment; or a stepped-care approach that began with supervised self-help, with the addition of fluoxetine in participants who were predicted to be non-responders after six sessions, followed by CBT for those who failed to achieve abstinence with self-help and medication management.ResultsBoth in the intent-to-treat and completer samples, there were no differences between the two treatment conditions in inducing recovery (no binge eating or purging behaviours for 28 days) or remission (no longer meeting DSM–IV criteria). At the end of 1-year follow-up, the stepped-care condition was significantly superior to CBT.ConclusionsTherapist-assisted self-help was an effective first-level treatment in the stepped-care sequence, and the full sequence was more effective than CBT suggesting that treatment is enhanced with a more individualised approach.

scholarly journals Benefits of non-drug interventions for people with suicidal crises in unipolar depression

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Berger ◽  
S Fuchs ◽  
N Baier ◽  
H Peters ◽  
R Busse
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Suicide Attempt ◽  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Unipolar Depression ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Drug Interventions

Abstract Background Depression is one of the most common and serious diseases worldwide: According to WHO, more than 300 million people worldwide were affected by depression in 2015. In this group, the suicide rate is about 20 times higher than the population average. In Germany, around 10,000 people take their lives each year, many of them suffering from depression. The Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care commissioned the Department of Health Care Management at the Berlin University of Technology to conduct a Health Technology Assessment on whether non-drug interventions influence coping with suicidal crises in unipolar depression. Methods A systematic search of primary studies and systematic reviews (e.g., in MEDLINE, PSYCINFO) was performed to assess the benefit of ambulatory crisis intervention programmes or psychosocial interventions compared to another non-drug treatment, drug treatment, inpatient treatment or no treatment/waiting list in adult suicidal patients with unipolar depression regarding patient-relevant outcomes (e.g., suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, depression). Results The search yielded a total of 4,159 hits. After two rounds of screening for relevance and removing duplicates, 4 studies remained for inclusion in the qualitative and quantitative analysis. The studies present RCTs assessing the effects of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) of the 2. and 3. wave - all short-term programmes focussing on suicidality. Results indicate a benefit of CBT compared to standard treatment, depending on the outcome, on the “wave” and on the time of follow up assessment. Conclusions There is some evidence on benefits of CBT for adult patients with suicidal crises in unipolar depression. However, the quality of the included RCTs is weak and evidence on benefits of other non-drug interventions in outpatient care is missing. Further research is needed to identify effective interventions, especially for the vulnerable weeks immediately after suicide attempt. Key messages Short term cognitive behavioural therapy with suicidal prevention elements may influence coping with suicidal crises in unipolar depression positively. Further research is needed to identify effective interventions for the vulnerable weeks immediately after suicide attempt.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and routine specialist care with and without cognitive–behavioural therapy in adolescents with major depression

2007 ◽  
Vol 191 (6) ◽  
pp. 521-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Byford ◽  
Barbara Barrett ◽  
Chris Roberts ◽  
Paul Wilkinson ◽  
Bernadka Dubicka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Major Depression ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Serotonin Reuptake ◽  
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

BackgroundMajor depression is an important and costly problem among adolescents, yet evidence to support the provision of cost-effective treatments is lacking.AimsTo assess the short-term cost-effectiveness of combined selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) together with clinical care compared with SSRIs and clinical care alone in adolescents with major depression.MethodPragmatic randomised controlled trial in the UK. Outcomes and costs were assessed at baseline, 12 and 28 weeks.ResultsThe trial comprised 208 adolescents, aged 11–17 years, with major or probable major depression who had not responded to a brief initial psychosocial intervention. There were no significant differences in outcome between the groups with and without CBT. Costs were higher in the group with CBT, although not significantly so (P=0.057). Cost-effectiveness analysis and exploration of the associated uncertainty suggest there is less than a 30% probability that CBT plus SSRIs is more cost-effective than SSRIs alone.ConclusionsA combination of CBT plus SSRIs is not more cost-effective in the short-term than SSRIs alone for treating adolescents with major depression in receipt of routine specialist clinical care.

Cognitive-Behavioural Treatment of Bulimia Nervosa

1995 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold Leitenberg
Keyword(s):  
Bulimia Nervosa ◽  
Effective Treatment ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Behavioural Treatment ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Treatment ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

This paper reviews the literature on cognitive-behavioural treatment of bulimia nervosa, including the rationale and procedure for including an exposure plus response-prevention component. Comparisons of the full cognitive-behavioural therapy package to no treatment, other forms of psychotherapy, and pharmacotherapy are evaluated. The evidence suggests that cognitive-behavioural therapy is a relatively effective treatment for bulimia nervosa, although long-term outcome is still far from optimal.

A randomized controlled trial of internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa or related disorders in a student population

2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 407-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. C. Sánchez-Ortiz ◽  
C. Munro ◽  
D. Stahl ◽  
J. House ◽  
H. Startup ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eating Disorder ◽  
Bulimia Nervosa ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Waiting List ◽  
Eating Disorder Examination ◽  
Delayed Treatment ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
E Mail

BackgroundBulimic eating disorders are common among female students, yet the majority do not access effective treatment. Internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy (iCBT) may be able to bridge this gap.MethodSeventy-six students with bulimia nervosa (BN) or eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) were randomly assigned to immediate iCBT with e-mail support over 3 months or to a 3-month waiting list followed by iCBT [waiting list/delayed treatment control (WL/DTC)]. ED outcomes were assessed with the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. Other outcomes included depression, anxiety and quality of life.ResultsStudents who had immediate iCBT showed significantly greater improvements at 3 and 6 months than those receiving WL/DTC in ED and other symptoms.ConclusionsiCBT with e-mail support is efficacious in students with bulimic disorders and has lasting effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document