HT Boosts Renal Cancer Risk in Obese Patients

2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (18) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Jeff Evans
2017 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 24-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rikki Cannioto ◽  
John Lewis Etter ◽  
Lauren Beryl Guterman ◽  
Janine M. Joseph ◽  
Nicholas R. Gulati ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Ottaiano ◽  
Chiara De Divitiis ◽  
Monica Capozzi ◽  
Antonio Avallone ◽  
Carmen Pisano ◽  
...  

Obesity is an epidemic disease and correlates with cardiovascular diseases increasing the overall mortality. However, it has been recently demonstrated that cancer is an unexpected consequence of obesity. In most of the studies, it is evaluated with body mass index (BMI): high BMI increases cancer risk and reduces survival of many solid tumors. The main biologic and clinic topics regarding obese cancer patients are here presented and discussed. Hyperinsulinemia and Insulin-like Growth Factors (IGFs) are among the most important links between cancer and obesity. However, adipose tissue (AT) also produces sex hormones, pro-inflammatory cytokines and hypoxia which in turn promote initiation and progression of tumors. One of the major clinic concern about obese cancer patients is the risk of chemotherapy-related toxicity. Previous studies showed that obese patients do not experience significant increased toxicity compared to non-obese patients. Thus, the increasing incidence and scientific knowledge of obesity should prompt the researchers to study for personalization of therapy in obese patients with cancer rather than for the simple chemotherapy “depotentiation”. It has been demonstrated that weight loss reduces cancer risk and can ameliorate compliance to therapy. Thus, social politics as well as therapies against obesity may impact on cancer risk, treatment and survival.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1584-1584
Author(s):  
Shan Yang ◽  
Scott T. Michalski ◽  
Jennifer Holle ◽  
Tali Ekstein ◽  
Erin O'Leary ◽  
...  

1584 Background: Multi-gene testing for cancer predisposition is increasingly utilized in clinical care. Although the diagnostic yield and management implications of such testing in breast, ovarian and colorectal cancer are relatively well understood, data for other cancer types are still emerging. In this study we retrospectively examined 39,147 patients referred for hereditary cancer syndrome testing for pathogenic germline variants in 80 cancer risk genes, focusing on those patients with renal, sarcoma, paraganglioma, melanoma, and pancreatic cancers. Methods: Test results and personal/family history were extracted from a sequential series of de-identified clinical test reports. Data for genes not clinically ordered were analyzed under an IRB approved research protocol. Common low penetrance risk alleles were excluded. Results: Overall, 14.3% (5,589) of patients carried germline pathogenic mutations in 80 cancer risk genes. Of the 949 patients with renal cancer 20% (190) were positive, and 44% of these findings were “unexpected”, meaning they appeared in genes that are not commonly requisitioned in renal cancer patients. Of the 423 sarcoma patients, 16% (68) had positive findings, 45% of which were “unexpected”. For both cancer types, greater than 90% of these “unexpected” findings were in genes with published management recommendations. Similar results were observed in melanoma, paraganglioma and pancreatic cancer patients. A second or third pathogenic variant, many of which were also “unexpected”, were found in 3.6% of positive cases. Conclusions: In this series of patients we estimate almost 12% of pathogenic variants across cancer indications are “unexpected”. These data suggest many actionable pathogenic variants are being missed due to adherence to overly restrictive, narrowly constructed tumor-specific panels. Clinicians should expand the scope of their test panels in order to capture variants with the potential to impact patients and their family members by informing implementation of established management guidelines.


2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Karami ◽  
Paolo Boffetta ◽  
Paul Brennan ◽  
Patricia A. Stewart ◽  
David Zaridze ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 126 (16) ◽  
pp. 3657-3666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Shuch ◽  
Shantao Li ◽  
Harvey Risch ◽  
Ranjit S. Bindra ◽  
Patrick D. McGillivray ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaotao Zhang ◽  
Gladys Browman ◽  
Wesley Siu ◽  
Karen M. Basen-Engquist ◽  
Samir M. Hanash ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Mouse and human studies support the promise of dry beans to improve metabolic health and to lower cancer risk. In overweight/obese patients with a history of colorectal polyps or cancer, the Beans to Enrich the Gut microbiome vs. Obesity’s Negative Effects (BE GONE) trial will test whether and how an increase in the consumption of pre-cooked, canned dry beans within the context of usual diet and lifestyle can enhance the gut landscape to improve metabolic health and reduce cancer risk. Methods/design This randomized crossover trial is designed to characterize changes in (1) host markers spanning lipid metabolism, inflammation, and obesity-related cancer risk; (2) compositional and functional profiles of the fecal microbiome; and (3) host and microbial metabolites. With each subject serving as their own control, the trial will compare the participant’s usual diet with (intervention) and without (control) dry beans. Canned, pre-cooked dry beans are provided to participants and the usual diet continually assessed and monitored. Following a 4-week run-in and equilibration period, each participant provides a total of 5 fasting blood and 6 stool samples over a total period of 16 weeks. The intervention consists of a 2-week ramp-up of dry bean intake to 1 cup/d, which is then continued for an additional 6 weeks. Intra- and inter-individual outcomes are assessed across each crossover period with consideration of the joint or modifying effects of the usual diet and baseline microbiome. Discussion The BE GONE trial is evaluating a scalable dietary prevention strategy targeting the gut microbiome of high-risk patients to mitigate the metabolic and inflammatory effects of adiposity that influence colorectal cancer risk, recurrence, and survival. The overarching scientific goal is to further elucidate interactions between diet, the gut microbiome, and host metabolism. Improved understanding of the diet-microbiota interplay and effective means to target these relationships will be key to the future of clinical and public health approaches to cancer and other major diet- and obesity-related diseases. Trial registration This protocol is registered with the U.S. National Institutes of Health trial registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, under the identifier NCT02843425. First posted July 25, 2016; last verified January 25, 2019.


2015 ◽  
Vol 138 (7) ◽  
pp. 1626-1633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Karami ◽  
Joanne S. Colt ◽  
Patricia A. Stewart ◽  
Kendra Schwartz ◽  
Faith G. Davis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document