scholarly journals Behavioural graded activity results in better exercise adherence and more physical activity than usual care in people with osteoarthritis: a cluster-randomised trial

2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martijn F. Pisters ◽  
Cindy Veenhof ◽  
Dinny H. de Bakker ◽  
François G. Schellevis ◽  
Joost Dekker
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Exercise Adherence ◽  
Cluster Randomised Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
Graded Activity

scholarly journals Active Play in After-school Programmes: development of an intervention and description of a matched-pair cluster-randomised trial assessing physical activity play in after-school programmes

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e016585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsti Riiser ◽  
Sølvi Helseth ◽  
Hanna Ellingsen ◽  
Bjørg Fallang ◽  
Knut Løndal
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
First Graders ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
After School ◽  
Cluster Randomised Trial ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Active Play ◽  
Cluster Randomised

IntroductionInterventions delivered in after-school programmes (ASPs) have the potential to become a means of ensuring adequate physical activity among schoolchildren. This requires a motivational climate, allowing for self-determined play. If trained, ASP staff may represent a valuable resource for supporting such play. Increasing knowledge and supportive skills among ASP staff may also potentially increase their motivation for work. The purpose of this article is to describe the development of the ‘Active Play in ASP’ intervention, which aims to promote physical activity among first graders attending ASP, and to present a protocol for a matched-pair cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the intervention.Methods and analysisInformed by experiences from practice, evidence-based knowledge and theory, the intervention was developed in a stepwise process including focus group meetings and a small-scale pilot test. The intervention contains a course programme for ASP staff to increase their skills in how to support physical activity through play. In a cluster randomised controlled trial, the ASPs will be matched and randomly allocated to receive the 7-month intervention or to a control group. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, after 7 and 19 months. First graders attending the ASPs included are eligible. The primary outcome will be accelerometer-determined minutes in moderate to vigorous physical activity in the ASP. The study uses a mixed methods approach including observations and interviews to provide rich descriptions of the concept of children's physical activity in ASP. Moreover, the trial will assess whether the ASP staff benefits from participation in the intervention in terms of increased work motivation. Lastly, process evaluations of programme fidelity, satisfaction and suggestions on improvement will be performed.Ethics and disseminationThe study is approved by the Data Protection Official for Research (reference no 46008). Results will be presented in conferences and peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberClinical Trials (NCT02954614), pre-results.

scholarly journals Reducing shoulder complaints in employees with high occupational shoulder exposures: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study (The Shoulder-Café Study)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette Trøstrup ◽  
Lone Ramer Mikkelsen ◽  
Poul Frost ◽  
Annett Dalbøge ◽  
Mette Terp Høybye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Usual Care ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Exercise Intervention ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Cluster Randomised Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Background: In Denmark, exercise therapy in combination with work modifications is the first choice treatment for persons with shoulder complaints and high occupational shoulder exposures. To obtain this treatment they must visit several healthcare providers, which makes usual care fragmented and uncoordinated. Therefore, we developed a new intervention which unifies the expertise that is needed. The main hypotheses are that a group-based Shoulder-Café intervention will reduce (I) shoulder complaints and (II) occupational shoulder exposures more effectively than an individual-based Shoulder-Guidance intervention (active control – enhanced usual care). Methods: A cluster-randomised trial is conducted including 120 employees with high occupational shoulder exposures. Companies (clusters) are randomised to either Shoulder-Café or Shoulder-Guidance with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants are 18–65 years old and have an Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) ≤ 40. Both interventions include a home-based shoulder exercise programme, assessment of shoulder exposures by technical measurements and self-report, and general information on how to reduce shoulder exposures. The Shoulder-Café course also includes three café meetings with physiotherapist-supervised exercises, clinical shoulder evaluation, education on shoulder anatomy, workplace-oriented counselling, and an opportunity for a workplace visit by a health and safety consultant. The primary outcomes are the OSS at 6 month follow-up (hypothesis I), and the mean number of minutes/day with the arm elevated > 60° shortly after end of intervention (hypothesis II). We will use mixed model analysis that allows for company clustering, and data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Discussion: Persons with shoulder complaints and high occupational shoulder exposures are an obvious target group for secondary prevention efforts. We developed the Shoulder-Café to reduce shoulder complaints and shoulder exposures while unifying the expertise that is needed to evaluate and treat shoulder complaints. If the intervention is effective, it would warrant widespread implementation. Trial registration: The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov on 18 May 2017 (ID: NCT03159910). Keywords: Exercise, Intervention, Mechanical exposure, Occupation, Randomised controlled trial, Shoulder, Training programme.

scholarly journals Reducing shoulder complaints in employees with high occupational shoulder exposures: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study (The Shoulder-Café Study)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette Trøstrup ◽  
Lone Ramer Mikkelsen ◽  
Poul Frost ◽  
Annett Dalbøge ◽  
Mette Terp Høybye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Usual Care ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
General Information ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Cluster Randomised Trial ◽  
Mixed Model Analysis ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
First Choice

Abstract Background: In Denmark, exercise therapy in combination with work modifications is the first choice treatment for persons with shoulder complaints and high occupational shoulder exposures. To obtain this treatment they must visit several healthcare providers, which makes usual care fragmented and uncoordinated. Therefore, we developed a new intervention which unifies the expertise that is needed. The main hypotheses are that a group-based Shoulder-Café intervention will more effectively reduce (I) shoulder complaints and (II) occupational shoulder exposures than an individual-based Shoulder-Guidance intervention (active control – enhanced usual care). Methods: A cluster-randomised trial is conducted including 120 employees with high occupational shoulder exposures. Companies (clusters) are randomised to either Shoulder-Café or Shoulder-Guidance with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants are 18–65 years old and have an Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) ≤ 40. Both interventions include a home-based shoulder exercise programme, assessment of shoulder exposures by technical measurements and self-report, and general information on how to reduce shoulder exposures. The Shoulder-Café course also includes three café meetings with physiotherapist-supervised exercises, clinical shoulder evaluation, education on shoulder anatomy, workplace-oriented counselling, and an opportunity for a workplace visit by a health and safety consultant. The primary outcomes are the OSS at 6 month follow-up (hypothesis I), and the mean number of minutes/day with the arm elevated > 60° shortly after end of intervention (hypothesis II). We will use mixed model analysis that allows for company clustering, and data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Discussion: Persons with shoulder complaints and high occupational shoulder exposures are an obvious target group for secondary prevention efforts. We developed the Shoulder-Café to reduce shoulder complaints and shoulder exposures while unifying the expertise that is needed to evaluate and treat shoulder complaints. If the intervention is effective, it would warrant widespread implementation. Trial registration: The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov on 18 May 2017 (ID: NCT03159910).

scholarly journals Long-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of collaborative care (versus usual care) for people with mental–physical multimorbidity: cluster-randomised trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 213 (2) ◽  
pp. 456-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth M. Camacho ◽  
Linda M. Davies ◽  
Mark Hann ◽  
Nicola Small ◽  
Peter Bower ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Collaborative Care ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomised Trial ◽  
Depression Symptoms ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
Life Years

BackgroundCollaborative care can support the treatment of depression in people with long-term conditions, but long-term benefits and costs are unknown.AimsTo explore the long-term (24-month) effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of collaborative care in people with mental-physical multimorbidity.MethodA cluster randomised trial compared collaborative care (integrated physical and mental healthcare) with usual care for depression alongside diabetes and/or coronary heart disease. Depression symptoms were measured by the symptom checklist-depression scale (SCL-D13). The economic evaluation was from the perspective of the English National Health Service.Results191 participants were allocated to collaborative care and 196 to usual care. At 24 months, the mean SCL-D13 score was 0.27 (95% CI, −0.48 to −0.06) lower in the collaborative care group alongside a gain of 0.14 (95% CI, 0.06-0.21) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The cost per QALY gained was £13 069.ConclusionsIn the long term, collaborative care reduces depression and is potentially cost-effective at internationally accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds.Declaration of interestNone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document