PATIENT-REPORTED NUMBNESS AND TINGLING AUGMENTS COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE EVENTS (CTCAE) TO DETECT CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY (CIPN) IN OLDER ADULTS WITH ADVANCED CANCER UNDERGOING SYSTEMIC TREATMENT

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. S67-S68
Author(s):  
E. Culakova ◽  
M. Mohamed ◽  
M. Flannery ◽  
A. Patil ◽  
S. Obrecht ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Effect of Mirogabalin on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Caused by Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Takasaki ◽  
Toshio Fujisawa ◽  
Mako Ushio ◽  
Sho Takahashi ◽  
Wataru Yamagata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Purpose: Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy is widely used to treat pancreatic cancer (PC), but chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is common. Mirogabalin is a novel drug for treating peripheral neuropathy. We investigated the effects of mirogabalin on CIPN due to GnP therapy in PC patients.Methods: This was a single-center retrospective pilot study. Patients who had previously received or were currently receiving GnP for PC and had taken mirogabalin for at least 2 weeks for CIPN, were included. Patients completed a questionnaire about their symptoms before and after taking mirogabalin. The primary outcome was the change in numbness and tingling scores on the patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Secondary outcomes were the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire–Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (QLQ-CIPN20) (Japanese version) score, numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score, and adverse events (AEs).Results: Increased numbness and tingling severity (1.84 vs. 1.76; P=0.63) and interference with daily life (1.42 vs. 1.44; P=0.80) were not seen in any of the 25 enrolled patients. The scores on the sensory subscale of the QLQ-CIPN improved significantly after treatment (17.5 vs. 15.7; P=0.02). AEs occurred in 22 patients (88%), but there were no serious AEs (≥ grade 3).Conclusions: Mirogabalin may control the progression of CIPN caused by GnP therapy in PC patients, and improved sensory neuropathy significantly in our patients. However, since the incidence of AEs is high, mirogabalin should be used with caution.

Randomized multicenter trial of 3 weekly cabazitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1008-1008
Author(s):  
Amit Bahl ◽  
Jeremy Braybrooke ◽  
Alicia Bravo ◽  
Emily Foulstone ◽  
Jessica Ball ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
First Line ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

1008 Background: Paclitaxel is commonly used as first line chemotherapy for HER2 negative MBC. However, with response rates of 21.5-53.7% and a significant risk of peripheral neuropathy there is a need for more effective and better tolerated chemotherapy (CCT). Methods: This open label randomised (1:1) phase 2 trial compared 6 cycles of cabazitaxel (25 mg/m2) every 3 weeks, with weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m2) over 18 weeks as first line CCT. HER2 negative and performance status ≤1 patients were eligible. Patients on cabazitaxel received GCSF prophylaxis. Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS) with 127 events required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 with 85% power. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1), time to response (TTR), overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability and quality of life (QoL). Results: 158 patients were recruited from 14 UK hospitals (79 in each arm). Median age (range) was 56(34-81) in the cabazitaxel arm and 61(34-79) in the paclitaxel arm. 61% of patients were performance status 0. Median time on treatment was 15 weeks for both arms, but more patients on paclitaxel had a treatment delay (61% vs 39%) or dose reduction (37% vs 24%). Comparing cabazitaxel to paclitaxel after 146 PFS events, median PFS was 6.7 vs 5.8 months (HR 0.84; 95%CI 0.60–1.18, P = 0.3). There was no difference in OS, median 19.3 vs 20.0 months (HR 0.94; 95%CI 0.63-1.40, P = 0.7), ORR (42% vs 37%) or TTR (HR 1.09; 95%CI 0.68–1.74, P = 0.7). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 42% of patients on cabazitaxel and 48% on paclitaxel. Diarrhoea, febrile neutropenia and nausea were the most common grade ≥3 events in the cabazitaxel arm with rates of 11%, 11% and 10% respectively compared to 1%, 1% and 0% in the paclitaxel arm. In the paclitaxel arm the top grade ≥3 events were lung infection and peripheral neuropathy, 6% and 5% respectively compared to 2.5% and 0% in the cabazitaxel arm. Peripheral neuropathy of any grade was reported by 55% of patients treated with paclitaxel vs 17% on cabazitaxel. Alopecia occurred in 41% of patients on paclitaxel compared to 27% on cabazitaxel. Adverse events leading to discontinuation were more frequent with paclitaxel (22%) than cabazitaxel (14%). Over the course of treatment, mean EQ5D single index utility score (+0.05; 95%CI 0.004-0.09, P = 0.03) and visual analogue scale score (+7.7; 95%CI 3.1-12.3, P = 0.001) were higher in the cabazitaxel arm compared to paclitaxel suggestive of better QoL on Cabazitaxel. Conclusions: 3 weekly cabazitaxel as first line chemotherapy in HER2 negative MBC does not significantly improve PFS compared to weekly paclitaxel, though it has a lower risk of peripheral neuropathy with better patient reported overall health outcomes. Cabazitaxel is safe and well tolerated for MBC and requires fewer hospital visits, an important consideration in the COVID pandemic and beyond. Clinical trial information: NCT03048942 .

The association of patient fatigue and outcomes in advanced cancer: An analysis of four SWOG treatment trials.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 140-140
Author(s):  
Julia Mo ◽  
Amy Darke ◽  
Katherine A Guthrie ◽  
Jeff A. Sloan ◽  
Joseph M. Unger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Survey Question ◽  
Treatment Trials ◽  
Lower Baseline ◽  
Patient Reported

140 Background: Prior studies have suggested that patient-reported outcomes may be associated with cancer outcomes. We evaluated the association between clinically significant fatigue (CSF) and adverse events (AEs), quality of life (QOL), and overall survival (OS) during cancer treatment. Methods: Four phase II or III chemotherapy trials, two each in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), were used to compare patients with or without baseline CSF. Baseline CSF was defined as a rating of 2 or greater on the FACT fatigue survey question or an EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue symptom score of 50% or greater. Change in QOL from baseline, AE rates, and survival were compared according to baseline CSF with linear regression models, equality of proportions chi-squared tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox regression models, respectively, separately for each trial. Results: Of 1,994 participants, 1,907 had complete baseline QOL survey data, with 52% reporting CSF at baseline. Baseline CSF was associated with an increased incidence of grade 3-5 constitutional (16.5% vs 9.4%, p = 0.002 and 13.9% vs 6.3%, p = 0.002) and neurological (11.7% vs 6.1%, p = 0.006 and 9.0% vs 3.9%, p = 0.01) AEs, respectively, in two studies of advanced HRPC. Overall, patients with baseline CSF had significantly lower baseline QOL across all four domains (p < 0.01). Across all four studies, baseline CSF was associated with higher mortality rates, with adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval, p-value): 1.34 (1.14, 1.57, p < .001) and 1.30 (1.02, 1.66, p = 0.03) in NSCLC studies, 1.49 (0.95, 2.35, p = 0.09) and 1.53 (1.12, 2.11, p = 0.008) in HRPC studies. Conclusions: Oncology trial participants with baseline CSF had significantly lower baseline QOL, experienced more adverse events and had poorer survival compared to participants without CSF. We have confirmed previous work indicating that fatigue is an important baseline stratification factor that should be considered in all oncology treatment trials. Consistent with other research, our results indicate that fatigue should be measured and ameliorated wherever possible among advanced cancer patients.

Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaires among Older Adults with Advanced Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie A. Flannery ◽  
Supriya Mohile ◽  
Eva Culakova ◽  
Sally Norton ◽  
Charles Kamen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals The Sickle Cell Disease Functional Assessment (SCD-FA) Tool: A Feasibility Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charity I. Oyedeji ◽  
Katherine Hall ◽  
Alison Luciano ◽  
Miriam C. Morey ◽  
John J. Strouse
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Sickle Cell Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Sickle Cell ◽  
Functional Assessment ◽  
Functional Decline ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Functional Impairments ◽  
Cell Disease ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background: The life expectancy for individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) has greatly increased over the last 50 years. Adults with SCD experience multiple complications such as cardiopulmonary disease, strokes, and avascular necrosis that lead to limitations that geriatric populations often experience. There are no dedicated instruments to measure functional decline and functional age to determine risk of future adverse outcomes in older adults with SCD. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of performing the Sickle Cell Disease Functional Assessment (SCD-FA).Methods: We enrolled 40 adults with SCD (20 younger adults age 18-49 years as a comparison group and 20 older adults age 50 years and older) in a single-center prospective cohort study. Participants were recruited from a single comprehensive sickle cell clinic in an academic center in the southeastern United States. We included measures validated in an oncology geriatric assessment enriched with additional physical, cognitive, and patient-reported measures at the intersection of sickle cell disease and geriatrics. The primary outcome was the proportion completing the assessment. Secondary outcomes were the proportion consenting, duration of the assessment, acceptability, and adverse events.Results: Eighty percent (44/55) of individuals approached consented, 91% (40/44) completed the SCD-FA in its entirety, and the median duration was 89 minutes (IQR 80-98). There were no identified adverse events. On the acceptability survey, 95% (38/40) reported the length as appropriate, 2.5% (1/40) reported a question as upsetting, and 5% (2/40) reported portions as difficult. Exploratory analyses of physical function showed 63% (25/40) had a slow usual gait speed (< 1.2 meter/second).Conclusion: The SCD-FA is feasible, acceptable, and safe and physical performance tests were useful in identifying functional impairments in adults with SCD. These findings will inform the next phase of the study where we will assess the validity of the SCD-FA to predict patient-important outcomes in a larger sample of adults with SCD.

Individualized cancer follow-up supported by electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Development and evaluation (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sissel Ravn ◽  
Henriette Vind Thaysen ◽  
Lene Seibaek ◽  
Victor Jilbert Verwaal ◽  
Lene Hjerrild Iversen
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Individualized Care ◽  
Patient Reported

BACKGROUND Cancer survivors experience unmet needs during follow-up. Besides recurrence, a follow-up includes detection of late side effects, rehabilitation, palliation and individualized care. OBJECTIVE We aimed to describe the development and evaluate the feasibility of an intervention providing individualized cancer follow-up supported by electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PRO). METHODS The study was carried out as an interventional study at a Surgical and a Gynecological Department offering complex cancer surgery and follow-up for advanced cancer. The e-PRO screened for a priori defined clinical important symptoms and needs providing individualized follow-up. We included following questionnaires in the e-PRO; the general European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and the EORTC validated for colorectal and ovarian cancer patients. To support individualization, we included three prioritized issues of the patient’s preference in each e-PRO. The response-algorithm was aggregated based on the severity of the patient’s response. To ensure the sensitivity of the e-PRO, we performed semi-structured interviews with five patients. All clinicians (surgeons and gynecologists) performing the consultations reviewed the e-PRO. The evaluation was divided in two, 1)The feasibility was assessed by a)Patients’ response rate of the e-PRO, b)Number of follow-up visits documenting the use of e-PRO and c)Patients’ prioritized issues prior to the consultation(‘yes’ / ‘no’), and after the follow-up 2)Patients assessment of a)The need and purpose of the follow-up visit and b)the support provided during the follow-up visit. RESULTS In total, 187 patients were included in the study, of which 73%(n=136/187) patients responded to the e-PRO and were subjected to an individualized follow-up. The e-PRO was documented as applied in 79% of the follow-up visits. In total, 23% of the prioritized issues did not include a response. Stratified by time since surgery, significantly more patients did not fill out a prioritized issue had a follow-up >6 months since surgery. In total, 72 % follow-up visits were evaluated to be necessary in order to discuss the outcome of the CT scan, symptoms, and/or prioritized issues. Contrary, 19% of the follow-up visits were evaluated to be necessary only to discuss the result of the CT scan. A range from 19.3–56.3% of patients assessed the follow-up visit to provide support with respect to physical (42% of patients), mental (56%), sexual (19%) or dietary (27%) issues. Further, a range from 34–60% of the patients reported that they did not need support regarding physical (43% of patients), mental (34%), sexual (63%) or dietary (57%) issues. CONCLUSIONS An individualized follow-up based on e-PRO is feasible, and support most patients surgically treated for advanced cancer. However, results indicate that follow-up based on e-PRO may not be beneficial for all patients and circumstances. A thorough cost-benefit analysis may be warranted before implementation in routine clinic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document