Randomized multicenter trial of 3 weekly cabazitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1008-1008
Author(s):  
Amit Bahl ◽  
Jeremy Braybrooke ◽  
Alicia Bravo ◽  
Emily Foulstone ◽  
Jessica Ball ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
First Line ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

1008 Background: Paclitaxel is commonly used as first line chemotherapy for HER2 negative MBC. However, with response rates of 21.5-53.7% and a significant risk of peripheral neuropathy there is a need for more effective and better tolerated chemotherapy (CCT). Methods: This open label randomised (1:1) phase 2 trial compared 6 cycles of cabazitaxel (25 mg/m2) every 3 weeks, with weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m2) over 18 weeks as first line CCT. HER2 negative and performance status ≤1 patients were eligible. Patients on cabazitaxel received GCSF prophylaxis. Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS) with 127 events required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 with 85% power. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1), time to response (TTR), overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability and quality of life (QoL). Results: 158 patients were recruited from 14 UK hospitals (79 in each arm). Median age (range) was 56(34-81) in the cabazitaxel arm and 61(34-79) in the paclitaxel arm. 61% of patients were performance status 0. Median time on treatment was 15 weeks for both arms, but more patients on paclitaxel had a treatment delay (61% vs 39%) or dose reduction (37% vs 24%). Comparing cabazitaxel to paclitaxel after 146 PFS events, median PFS was 6.7 vs 5.8 months (HR 0.84; 95%CI 0.60–1.18, P = 0.3). There was no difference in OS, median 19.3 vs 20.0 months (HR 0.94; 95%CI 0.63-1.40, P = 0.7), ORR (42% vs 37%) or TTR (HR 1.09; 95%CI 0.68–1.74, P = 0.7). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 42% of patients on cabazitaxel and 48% on paclitaxel. Diarrhoea, febrile neutropenia and nausea were the most common grade ≥3 events in the cabazitaxel arm with rates of 11%, 11% and 10% respectively compared to 1%, 1% and 0% in the paclitaxel arm. In the paclitaxel arm the top grade ≥3 events were lung infection and peripheral neuropathy, 6% and 5% respectively compared to 2.5% and 0% in the cabazitaxel arm. Peripheral neuropathy of any grade was reported by 55% of patients treated with paclitaxel vs 17% on cabazitaxel. Alopecia occurred in 41% of patients on paclitaxel compared to 27% on cabazitaxel. Adverse events leading to discontinuation were more frequent with paclitaxel (22%) than cabazitaxel (14%). Over the course of treatment, mean EQ5D single index utility score (+0.05; 95%CI 0.004-0.09, P = 0.03) and visual analogue scale score (+7.7; 95%CI 3.1-12.3, P = 0.001) were higher in the cabazitaxel arm compared to paclitaxel suggestive of better QoL on Cabazitaxel. Conclusions: 3 weekly cabazitaxel as first line chemotherapy in HER2 negative MBC does not significantly improve PFS compared to weekly paclitaxel, though it has a lower risk of peripheral neuropathy with better patient reported overall health outcomes. Cabazitaxel is safe and well tolerated for MBC and requires fewer hospital visits, an important consideration in the COVID pandemic and beyond. Clinical trial information: NCT03048942 .

Clinical outcome of modified FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first line chemotherapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 438-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuo Watanabe ◽  
Yusuke Hashimoto ◽  
Kumiko Umemoto ◽  
Hideaki Takahashi ◽  
Mitsuhito Sasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

438 Background: FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GN) have been established as first line chemotherapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). But few data support preferable first line choice of these two regimens in “real-world” clinical setting. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 135 chemotherapy-naive mPC patients treated with modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) or GN at National Cancer Center Hospital East between December 2013 and September 2015. mFFX is a modified regimen of reduced dose of irinotecan 150mg/m2 and eliminated bolus 5-FU from original FFX. GN consists of gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 plus nab-paclitaxel 125mg/m2 day1,8,15 every 4 weeks. We compared characteristics, efficacy and adverse events between mFFX and GN. Results: Seventy patients were treated with mFFX and 65 patients with GN as first line therapy. Demographic and baseline characteristics (mFFX/GN) were similar as follows: ECOG performance status (0-1): 100% / 99%, Gender (male): 66% / 69%, liver metastasis: 56%/49%, peritoneal metastasis: 34% / 31%, prior biliary drainage: 21%/17%, median observation period: 330 / 265 days, respectively. The population of elderly patients ( > 75y) was smaller in mFFX than GN (4.3% vs. 12%, p = 0.05). Objective response rate (27% vs. 39%, p = 0.02) and disease control rate (79% vs. 92%, p = 0.02) were significantly lower in mFFX than in GN. Median OS was 11.5 months (95% CI: 9.7-16.8) in mFFX and 14.0 months (95% CI: 12.2 - not reached) in GN. Median PFS was 5.7 months (95% CI: 3.4-7.1) in mFFX and 6.5 months (95% CI: 6.1-7.9) in GN. One-year survival rate was significantly higher in GN than in mFFX (44% vs. 67%, p = 0.0006). Incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (47% vs. 45%), diarrhea (1.4% vs. 2.0%), and peripheral neuropathy (4.2% vs. 4.6%) were similar in each group. On the other hand, incidences of febrile neutropenia (8.5% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.06) and G-CSF use rate (21% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001), anorexia (13% vs. 3%, p = 0.03) were significantly higher in mFFX than those of GN. Conclusions: Patients treated with GN showed more favorable efficacy and survival. Incidences of most adverse events did not differ between mFFX and GN,whereas febrile neutropenia occurred more frequently in mFFX.

First-line nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) plus two cycles of chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone (4 cycles) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Two-year update from CheckMate 9LA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9000-9000
Author(s):  
Martin Reck ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Manuel Cobo ◽  
Michael Schenker ◽  
Bogdan Zurawski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

9000 Background: In the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9LA trial (NCT03215706), first-line NIVO + IPI combined with 2 cycles of chemo significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs chemo alone (4 cycles). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level and histology. Here we report data with 2 years’ minimum follow-up from this study. Methods: Adult patients (pts) with stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were stratified by PD-L1 (< 1% vs ≥ 1%), sex, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + chemo (2 cycles; n = 361) or chemo alone (4 cycles; n = 358). Pts with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-alone arm could receive pemetrexed maintenance. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included PFS and ORR by blinded independent central review, and efficacy by different PD-L1 levels. Safety was exploratory. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 24.4 months for OS (database lock: Feb 18, 2021), pts treated with NIVO + IPI + chemo continued to derive OS benefit vs chemo, with a median OS of 15.8 months vs 11.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.61–0.86]); 2-year OS rates were 38% vs 26%. Median PFS with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was 6.7 months vs 5.3 months (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56–0.79]); 8% and 37% of pts who had disease progression received subsequent immunotherapy, respectively. ORR was 38% with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs 25% with chemo. Similar clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was observed in all randomized pts and across the majority of subgroups, including by PD-L1 expression level (Table) or histology. Any grade and grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 92% and 48% of pts in the NIVO + IPI + chemo arm vs 88% and 38% in the chemo arm, respectively. Conclusion: With 2 years’ minimum follow-up, first-line NIVO + IPI + chemo demonstrated durable survival and benefit versus chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC; no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Promising Immunotherapy in Metastatic Testicular Sex Cord Stromal Tumours After First-Line Chemotherapy

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingqing Shang ◽  
Chuanzhen Cao ◽  
Weixing Jiang ◽  
Hongzhe Shi ◽  
Xingang Bi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Chemotherapy Resistance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
First Line ◽  
Experienced Grade ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

BackgroundTesticular sex cord stromal tumours (TSCSTs) are rare, with few studies focusing on the metastatic TSCST prognosis. The value of treatments, including radical orchiectomy (RO) and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), in preventing metastasis is controversial. Additionally, metastatic TSCSTs are resistant to chemotherapy. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy in metastatic TSCSTs after first-line chemotherapy.MethodsWe retrospectively screened patients with testicular tumours undergoing testis surgery between January 2005 and January 2019. Patients with TSCSTs who had undergone testis-sparing surgery (TSS) or RO were identified. The malignant type was defined as metastasis confirmed by pathology. Treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety were analysed.ResultsAmong the 494 testicular tumour patients who received TSS or RO, 11 (2.2%) patients with histologically proven TSCSTs were identified. At the last follow-up, 7 patients survived without tumours, and 4 patients developed metastasis and received first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy, with 1 of them achieving an objective response. Their PFS times were 1.5, 2.2, 9.0, and 17.0 months, respectively. Two patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after developing chemotherapy resistance and achieved a partial response up to the last follow-up; one of them experienced Grade 1 adverse events, and the other experienced Grade 2 adverse events during immunotherapy. The median OS time of the 4 patients with metastatic TSCSTs was 32 months.ConclusionsTSCSTs are rare, and most are benign with a good prognosis. ICIs represent a promising option for improving clinical outcomes in metastatic TSCSTs.

Safety and efficacy outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and low Karnofsky performance status: Results from the CheckMate 920 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 315-315
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Hutson ◽  
Bradley Curtis Carthon ◽  
Jeffrey Yorio ◽  
Sunil Babu ◽  
Heidi Ann McKean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3

315 Background: Combination therapy with nivolumab + ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) has demonstrated long-term efficacy and tolerability for patients (pts) with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Most pivotal clinical trials in pts with aRCC have excluded pts with low Karnofsky performance status (KPS; < 70%). CheckMate 920 is a multi-arm, phase IIIb/IV, open-label clinical trial of NIVO+IPI treatment in pts enrolled in a community practice setting with aRCC and a high unmet medical need. We present safety and efficacy results for the cohort of pts with aRCC of any histology and KPS 50%–60% from CheckMate 920 (NCT02982954). Methods: Pts with previously untreated advanced/metastatic RCC and KPS 50%–60% received NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W × 4 doses followed by 480 mg NIVO Q4W for ≤ 2 years or until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade ≥ 3 immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) within 100 days of last dose of study drug. Key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1 (both per investigator). Exploratory endpoints included overall survival (OS). Results: Of 25 treated pts with KPS 50%–60%, 76% were men; median age was 67 years (range, 34–81). IMDC risk was favorable in 0%, intermediate in 32%, and poor in 68% of pts; 84% had clear cell and 16% had non-clear cell RCC histology. With a minimum follow-up of 25 months, median duration of therapy (95% CI) was 2.3 months (2.1–7.7) for NIVO and 2.1 months (2.1–2.1) for IPI. The median number of doses (range) received was 4 (1–27) for NIVO and 4 (1–4) for IPI; 76% of pts received ≥ 4 NIVO doses and 68% received all 4 IPI doses. The only grade 3–4 imAEs by category were hepatitis (4.0%) and adrenal insufficiency (4.0%). No grade 5 imAEs occurred. Overall, 4 (16%) pts discontinued due to any-grade adverse events (n = 1 each for elevated AST, malignant neoplasm progression, back pain, and acetabulum fracture). Of 18 evaluable pts, ORR was 33.3% (95% CI, 13.3–59.0); no pts had a complete response and 6 had partial response. Median time to objective response was 4.5 months (range, 2.5–24.7). Median duration of objective response was 20.6 months (range, 0.03+–24.2+). Median PFS was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.5–14.8). Median OS was 15.6 months (95% CI, 5.3–25.1). Conclusions: NIVO+IPI demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in pts with previously untreated aRCC and KPS 50%–60%. The combination was tolerated at a dose intensity similar to that observed in clinical trials conducted in pts with higher KPS (≥ 70%). These data support the value of NIVO+IPI in pts who may not be considered ideal candidates for this therapy and consequently may have limited treatment options. Clinical trial information: NCT02982954 .

Phase II Study of Thalidomide in Escalating Doses for Follicular (F-NHL) and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (Sll): CALGB Study 50002.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3284-3284 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Grinblatt ◽  
Jeffrey Johnson ◽  
Donna Niedzwicki ◽  
David A. Rizzieri ◽  
Nancy Bartlett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Median Daily Dose ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Thalidomide has marked activity in both untreated and heavily pretreated myeloma. Its activity in part is believed to be due to inhibition of bFGF and VEGF induced angiogenesis. Elevated levels of bFGF in serum and urine have correlated with decreased survival in lymphoma possibly through up-regulation of BCL-2. Methods: 25 patients (pts) with previously treated F-NHL and SLL were registered and treated on this multi-institutional study from July 2001–April 2004 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral thalidomide in this patient group. Pts had B-cell SLL (7: 36.8%), F-NHL grade 1 (7: 36.8%), grade 2 (3: 15.8%) and grade 3 (2: 10.1%) NHL. Pts were eligible for entry with up to 3 prior chemotherapy (CT) and 2 immunotherapy (IT) regimens provided performance status was ≥ 1. Pts with new onset of B-symptoms, rising LDH, rapid tumor growth or greater than one year from initial diagnosis were required to undergo repeat lymph node biopsy to exclude recent transformation. Pts with CNS involvement, prior peripheral neuropathy >gr 1, HIV+, and pregnant or nursing women were also excluded. Pts were required to have Cr <2 x ULN, AST/ALT <2.5 x ULN and an ANC > 750. Median age at study entry was 60 years (36–87). Prior therapy was evaluated in 20 pts and 17/20 had received multi-agent CT while 12/20 pts received prior IT. Thalidomide was initiated at a dose of 200 mg daily and escalated by 100 mg daily every 1–2 weeks as tolerated with a maximal dose of 800 mg/d. If ≥ gr 2 peripheral neuropathy or ≥ gr 3 somnolence or mood changes occurred, the dose was held for one week and restarted at 50% of the prior daily dosage. Results: The median daily dose was 400 mg (range 50–800 mg). There was 1 complete response (CRu-residual abnormality) in a pt with SLL and one partial response in a pt with F-NHL grade 1 (ORR 8%: 95%CI: 1–26%). 16 pts had progressive disease during therapy and 2 died of disease soon after stopping therapy due to adverse events. One patient continues on therapy without progression of disease to date. The remaining 4 pts were taken off of therapy prior to the first 3 month evaluation. The reason for withdrawal was pt refusal (2) and adverse events (2). The median event free survival was 2.6 months (95% CI:1.4–4.4 mos) with a median overall survival of 23.3 months. Toxicity information on 24/25 pts revealed 4 (17%) with grade 4 neutropenia with 1/4 febrile as well. The most common grade 3 toxicities were anemia (13%), dyspnea (13%), fatigue (8%) and neurologic toxicities consisting of somnolence, dizziness, depression and anxiety (21%). Peripheral sensory neuropathy was reported as gr 2 in 8% and gr 3 in 8%. However, 38% of pts were reported as experiencing gr 2 fatigue. There were no grade 5 toxicities. Conclusion: These phase II trial results in a pretreated pt population demonstrate that, despite an acceptable toxicity profile, thalidomide has only minimal efficacy in F- NHL and SLL.

Impact of gemcitabine (G) on the activity of first-line chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A meta-analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7138-7138
Author(s):  
G. L. Pappagallo ◽  
O. Belvedere ◽  
O. Vinante ◽  
F. Grossi
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

7138 Background: A two-drug platinum-based regimen in which cisplatin or carboplatin is combined with a third-generation agent (i.e. paclitaxel, vinorelbine, docetaxel, or G) is the standard first-line treatment for NSCLC patients with good performance status. Encouraging results have recently been reported for nonplatinum regimens composed of two third-generation drugs. Methods: To assess the impact of G on the activity of first-line chemotherapy in NSCLC, we carried out a meta-analysis on data from 4,362 NSCLC patients who were enrolled in 11 randomized trials comparing a G-containing vs. G-free new generation regimens. We constructed 2x2 tables using response to treatment data. For trials with more than one eligible G-free comparator arm, individual comparisons between the G-based treatment arms and each of the comparator arms were analyzed. A general variance-based method was used to estimate the pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We assessed for heterogeneity among the trials based on standard methods. Results: Sixteen comparisons contributed to this analysis. G-containing regimens included: G+cisplatin (894), G+docetaxel (565), G+paclitaxel (200 patients), G+vinorelbine (157), G+carboplatin (49). G-free regimens included: vinorelbine+cisplatin (866), carboplatin+paclitaxel (539), docetaxel+cisplatin (494), cisplatin+paclitaxel (439), vinorelbine+carboplatin (159). Comparing G-containing vs. G-free regimens, the OR for progression was 0.867 (CI 95% 0.770–0.977; p = 0.019), with heterogeneity chi-square 11.639 (p = 0.71). No significant difference was observed for complete (OR 0.909, CI 95% 0.556–1.487; P = 0.707) and overall (complete + partial) response (OR 0.987, CI 95% 0.881–1.106; P = 0.819). Conclusions: These data demonstrate that the progression of disease is more likely in patients treated with G-free doublets. Further analyses are required to address whether disease control (objective response + stable disease) is associated with a survival benefit and may therefore be used as a surrogate end point for survival in chemotherapy trials of NSCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 trial: Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus axitinib versus sunitinib alone in treatment-naive advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4597-TPS4597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Thomas Powles ◽  
Mei Chen ◽  
Markus Puhlmann ◽  
Michael B. Atkins
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Antiangiogenic Agents ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
End Points ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Treatment Naïve

TPS4597 Background: Antiangiogenic agents, including sunitinib and axitinib, have shown clinically significant efficacy in patients (pts) with mRCC. Results from a phase 1b study in 52 pts suggest first-line pembro, an anti–programmed death 1 antibody, in combination with axitinib, has substantial antitumor activity in mRCC (objective response rate [ORR], 71%) and manageable toxicity. The phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized KEYNOTE-426 study (NCT02853331) is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembro plus axitinib versus sunitinib alone in pts with treatment-naive mRCC. Methods: Key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, histologically confirmed mRCC with clear cell component (with or without sarcomatoid features), measurable disease (RECIST v1.1, investigator review), no prior systemic therapy for advanced disease, Karnofsky performance status ≥70%, and provision of a tumor sample for biomarker analyses. Before randomization, pts will be stratified by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk category and geographic region. 840 pts will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembro 200 mg every 3 wk + axitinib 5 mg twice daily or sunitinib 50 mg once daily for 4 wk followed by 2 wk off. Treatment will continue until progressive disease, unacceptable adverse events (AEs), or withdrawal of consent. Pts in the pembro arm may receive up to 35 doses of pembro, after which axitinib-only treatment may continue. Imaging will be performed at wk 12, then every 6 wk for the first year, and every 12 wk thereafter. Bone scans will be performed at baseline, and if positive, repeated at wk 18, 30, 42, and 54, and every 24 wk thereafter. AEs will be monitored throughout and graded per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Primary end points are to compare progression-free survival (RECIST v1.1, central review) and overall survival between treatment arms. Secondary end points include the comparison of ORR, duration of response, disease control rate, safety, and patient-reported outcomes between arms. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02853331.

Determinants of early discontinuation of first-line chemotherapy, and associated outcomes among elderly with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9102-9102
Author(s):  
Pramit Nadpara
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Performance Score ◽  
First Line ◽  
Early Discontinuation ◽  
Primary Treatment Modality ◽  
Comorbidity Burden ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

9102 Background: Chemotherapy is the primary treatment modality in elderly with Advanced-NSCLC (Adv-NSCLC), with ASCO/NCCN guideline recommending First-Line Chemotherapy (FL-Chemo) for at least 4 months. The objective of this study was to identify the determinants, and outcomes of early discontinuation of FL-Chemo, in a nationwide sample of elderly patients. Methods: We used NCI’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry linked Medicare (SEER-Medicare) 2007-2014 files. We included patients with NSCLC diagnosis in 2007-2013, age ≥65, AJCC Stage IIIB/IV, receiving only FL-Chemo (Identified using HCPCS/CPT codes), and surviving at least 9 months post-diagnosis. We excluded those with non-continuous Medicare enrollment, or HMO enrollment. Patients receiving 1-3 months (vs. 4-7 months) of FL-Chemo were characterized as those experiencing early discontinuation. Patient’s performance status and comorbidity burden were assessed using previously validated algorithms. Survival was calculated from the diagnosis date to the date of death/study end date. Chi-square test, logistic regression, survivor function, proportional hazards regression, and propensity score–adjusted modeling were conducted. Results: We identified 1,029 patients (meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria) with incident Adv-NSCLC during the study years. Of those, 43.2% patients experienced early discontinuation. Adjusted analysis revealed Age as the only significant factor associated with early FL-Chemo discontinuation, with odds increasing with increase in age (p < 0.035). Other patient factors (non-clinical and clinical factors including performance score, comorbidity) were not associated with early discontinuation in any model. Survival outcomes and mortality risk were poor among those experiencing early discontinuation, however the difference was not statistically significant (p < 0.165). Conclusions: A large proportion of elderly with Adv-NSCLC experience early discontinuation of FL-Chemo. Even after controlling for variability in patient performance score and comorbidity burden, Age remained a key factor associated with early discontinuation, raising a cause for concern. Future studies need to explore the impact of Age along with patient reported Quality of Life on early treatment discontinuation.

Docetaxel is a major cytotoxic drug for the treatment of advanced breast cancer: a phase II trial of the Clinical Screening Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Chevallier ◽  
P Fumoleau ◽  
P Kerbrat ◽  
V Dieras ◽  
H Roche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
First Line ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

PURPOSE This trial investigated the toxicity and efficacy of docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in women with heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS From April 1992 to August 1992, 35 patients with advanced breast cancer from 29 to 65 years of age with a performance status of 0 to 2 were entered onto the study. Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was administered every 3 weeks as a 1-hour infusion on day 1 without routine premedication for hypersensitivity reactions. Thirty-one patients were assessable for response. Previous adjuvant chemotherapy had been given to 11 patients. RESULTS Five complete responses (CRs) and 16 partial responses (PRs) were observed, for an overall response rate of 67.7% (95% confidence interval, 49% to 83%). A CR occurred at 13 of 45 assessable sites (four liver, two lung, three breast, three lymph node, and one skin). The median duration of response was 44+ weeks, the median time to disease progression 37+ weeks, and the median overall survival time 16+ months. Among 34 patients assessable for toxicity (177 cycles; median, five cycles per patient), the following side effects were reported: nadir neutropenia grade 3 (three patients); grade 4 (31 patients); no grade 3 to 4 infection, acute hypersensitivity-like reaction (10 patients); grade 2 to 3 alopecia (all patients); and grade 2 to 3 nausea and vomiting (six patients). Fluid retention occurred in 26 patients and consisted of weight gain, edema alone (15 patients), or edema associated with serous effusion (11 patients). This side effect led to treatment discontinuation in 16 of 21 responding patients after a median of five cycles and a median cumulative dose of docetaxel of 574 mg/m2. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that docetaxel has major antitumor activity when used as a single cytotoxic agent as first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer.

Preliminary results of second-line chemotherapy with vinorelbine and gemcitabine after docetaxel and carboplatin failure in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17130-17130
Author(s):  
J. Abou Yared ◽  
G. Chahine ◽  
J. Kattan ◽  
F. Farhat ◽  
W. Moukadem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
First Line ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Metastatic Sites ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

17130 Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a doublet platinum-free therapy based on Vinorelbine and Gemcitabine in the salvage treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC, previously treated with Carboplatin and Docetaxel. Methods: We conducted a phase II study with the combination of vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 d1 d8 / 3w. Eligible were patients with histologically proven advanced or metastatic NSCLC who were refractory or progressed after first-line chemotherapy combining Docetaxel and Carboplatin. Results of this first-line therapy were already reported (Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2005, abstr 7330). Patients must have measurable disease, PS ≤ 2, life-expectancy ≥ 3 months, adequate hematologic, liver and renal functions. Response to therapy was evaluated according to RECIST guidelines. Toxicities were assessed according to the national cancer institute (NCI) common toxicity criteria 3.0. Results: From August 2004 to September 2005, 28 patients were enrolled. Median age was 63 years (range, 44 to 77) with 18 males and 10 females. A total of 109 cycles were delivered with a median of 4 cycles per patient (range, 1 to 9). Mean metastatic sites were lymph nodes in 9 pts, liver in 6 pts and pleura in 5 pts. 26 patients were evaluable for response (1 patient too early and 1 pt lost of follow-up). 6 patients responded partially (23%), one of them was initially resistant to the first-line therapy. 11 patients had stable disease (42%). Mean objective response duration was 7 months (range, 5 to 10+). Main toxicities (grade 3/4) were: anemia in 4 patients, neutropenia in 7 patients, leucopenia in 8 patients and lymphopenia in 4 patients. Neutropenic fever was encountered in only one patient. Non-hematological toxicities grade 3/4 were universally absent. No dose reduction or treatment delay related to toxicity was necessary. Conclusion: The study is still ongoing and more patients are expected to define time to progression and survival. However, these preliminary results were encouraging with low toxicity profile. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document