Team-based Discussion on Preoperative Evaluation and Decision-making About Surgery

2017 ◽  
pp. 60-67
Author(s):  
Suzanne Festen ◽  
Pauline de Graeff ◽  
Joanna A. Ijzerman ◽  
Barbara L. van Leeuwen
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Choi ◽  
Andrew Tang ◽  
Sudish Murthy ◽  
Siva Raja

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitris Papagoras ◽  
Maria Kanara ◽  
Stella Ntouvli

<p align="justify"><em>Elderly cancer patients represent a steadily rising population constituting a daily problem for any physician, who is confronted not only with medical questions but also with ethical and social dilemmas. In addition oncogeriatric patients are underrepresented or excluded from trials especially in surgery which results in a gap in practical and evidence based knowledge regarding their preoperative evaluation and treatment. Therefore the authors outline the framework a decision making process for a meaning – and success- full treatment plan has to rely on.</em><em></em></p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1-2S) ◽  
pp. 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melise A. Keays ◽  
Sumit Dave

In this article, we present the current approach to hypospadias, a review of the classification, preoperative evaluation, and factors that enable decision-making during surgery. We will then discuss patient-reported outcomes, evaluating the patients’ and parents’ perspectives regarding hypospadias repair.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E.P. Prince ◽  
Carol R. Bradford ◽  
Charles J Krause

The surgical management of lesions of the oral cavity is complex and requires the surgeon to consider multiple factors. Frequently a multidisciplinary team should be included in the decision-making process, particularly when a malignant lesion is being treated. Preoperative evaluation is critical in determining the optimal therapy and often will include radiologic evaluation and flexible endoscopy in addition to physical examination. Surgical decision making includes determining when a transoral approach is possible and appropriate versus a more extensive surgical approach such as a lip split and mandibulotomy. For small lesions, with a cooperative patient, local anesthesia might be adequate, but often, general anesthesia will be required. For malignant lesions, management of possible cervical node metastasis must be included in the treatment plan. Management of the airway during surgery and postoperatively must also be carefully considered. When there is concern for significant postoperative swelling or trismus, which might make reintubation difficult, tracheostomy should be considered. Primary closure can be effective for small defects. In some circumstances, a skin graft or local flaps can be successfully employed. When surgical excision results in larger defects, reconstruction must be included in the surgical plan.   This review contains 13 figures, 7 tables and 32 references Key Words: glossectomy, lip split, oral cancer, mandibulectomy, mandibulotomy, maxillectomy, ranula, sialendoscopy


Author(s):  
Jon Tomasson ◽  
Mohamed A Mahmoud ◽  
James P Spaeth

It has been long recognized that patients with anterior mediastinal masses (AMMs) have a significantly increased risk of adverse perioperative events. Even asymptomatic patients or those with mild clinical symptoms are at risk for cardiopulmonary collapse and even death with induction of anesthesia, thus highlighting the need for careful preoperative evaluation and decision making.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Simen ◽  
Fuat Balcı

AbstractRahnev & Denison (R&D) argue against normative theories and in favor of a more descriptive “standard observer model” of perceptual decision making. We agree with the authors in many respects, but we argue that optimality (specifically, reward-rate maximization) has proved demonstrably useful as a hypothesis, contrary to the authors’ claims.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document