Judicial Trends in Child Custody Cases in Bangladesh: Traditional Islamic Law Rules versus Welfare Considerations

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taslima YASMIN

AbstractIn Bangladesh, disputes over custody and guardianship involving Muslim parties are principally governed by Muslim personal law. There remains a constant dilemma in judicial decisions over custody and guardianship matters as to what should be the paramount consideration in awarding child custody to a party – should traditional Muslim personal law rules or the welfare of the child prevail? The findings of this study indicate that there is a steady but inconsistent trend towards child welfare considerations. However, it cannot conclusively be said that a child’s welfare is now themostdominant, or theonlyconsideration for the courts. Focusing on this shift towards a welfare approach, this article critically examines some of the leading reported judgments of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh on the issue.

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 616-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn Dressel ◽  
Tomoo Inoue

To what extent do informal networks shape the decisions of the Supreme Court of the Philippines? Though often raised in the Philippines, this question has never been studied empirically. To answer it, we constructed a set of social network variables to assess how informal ties, based on university connections and work affiliations, may have influenced the court’s decisions between 1986 and 2015 in 47 politically high-profile cases. Providing statistically significant evidence for the effects of political influence (presidential appointments) and hierarchical pressure (the vote of the Chief Justice) on related networks, our analysis suggests a continuing tension on the Supreme Court bench between professionalism and informality. Because the findings advance both theoretical and empirical understanding of larger issues at the intersection of courts and society throughout the region, we recommend more attention to the role of judicial networks, external to the courts as well as within them.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-28
Author(s):  
Dragutin Avramović

Following hypothesis of Andrew Watson, American professor of Psychiatry and Law, the author analyses certain psychological impacts on behavior of judges and examines the relationship between their idiosyncrasies and their judicial decisions. The survey encompasses the judges of Criminal Department of the Supreme Court of Cassation of the Republic of Serbia and, also, for comparative reasons, the judges of Criminal Department of the First Basic Court in Belgrade. Considering the main issues there is no great discrepancy between answers given by the judges of the Supreme Court and those of the Basic Court. Most responses of the Serbian judges deviate from Watson's conclusions, namely: they do not admit that they feel frustrated due to heavy caseloads, the significant majority of judges are reluctant to acknowledge their prejudices and influence of biases on their ruling, the significant majority of judges are not burdened with the idea of possible misuse of their discretion, they nearly unanimously deny that public opinion and media pressure affect their rulings, etc. Generally, the judges in Serbia are not willing to admit that they cannot always overcome their own subjectivities.


Author(s):  
Fatahuddin Aziz Siregar

The South Tapanuli community adopts a patrilineal kinship system so that women do not get inheritance, even if there is acquisition of property, women receive it not in their capacity as heirs but in the form of holong ni ate as confirmed in the Supreme Court Jurisprudence number 506K / Sip / 1968 dated January 22, 1969 However, on the other hand the Tapsel community underwent a process of Islamization that was quite deep, so that the customary law of South Tapanuli was also influenced by positive law including Jurisprudence which gave heir to girls later issued by the Supreme Court number 528K / Sip / 1972 dated 17 January 1973. This rule makes the practice of distributing the assets of Tapsel's community inheritance also shifts no longer according to the full provisions of adat law.This paper focuses on answering the factors that cause the shift in Batak customary inheritance in Tapsel, how the form of Batak adat inheritance shifts in Tapsel, and how the role of Islamic law in the shifting Batak customary inheritance in Tapsel. To answer this, use descriptive-analytical field research using data collection techniques in the form of observations and interviews with traditional leaders, religious leaders, judges and the community who carry out the distribution of inheritance.From this search, the authors found that the practice of inheritance in Tapsel society has shifted from adat inheritance caused by two factors, namely, First, the factor of Islamic law because Tapsel people have understood Islam well and run it in various fields of life including in the distribution of inheritance. Given that there are dozens of Islamic education institutions in Tapsel according to the author has given a pretty good understanding of Islamic law. So in general it can be said, that this change is a consequence of the Islamization process experienced by the Tapsel people. Second, is the factor of higher power or positive law because until now the community still believes that only the Religious Courts as a place to solve the problem of inheritance to obtain legal certainty.The shift to adat inheritance occurs in several patterns. The first pattern is a total change from customary form to division according to faraid, this pattern occurs in areas that are fairly Islamic, namely the Mandailing Natal region, although of course there are some people who divide in a way that is not consistent in carrying out Islamic law. The second pattern is to carry out adat law, namely in communities that are relatively strict with adat, namely in the Padang Lawas and Sipirok regions, in this area many cases seem to have carried out faraid formally but the substance still reflects the spirit of adat law. The third pattern, namely the way of division which is a combination of Islamic law and customary law, which is a fairly moderate community in the Angkola region.Islamic law has contributed by shifting the implementation of customary law to Islamic law. People who according to customary law do not receive inheritance become heirs who receive a certain portion. At first the mother did not count as an heir, then given a part 1/3 or 1/6. Istdri initially did not get any portion of the inheritance then received 1/4 or 1/8. Girls initially only have the status of olong ate, then receive a relatively large portion, which is 1/2 or 2/3.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-196
Author(s):  
Muhammad Salda ◽  
Sanusi Bintang ◽  
Teuku Muttaqin Mansur

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perbedaan hak bantuan hukum dalam konsep hukum Islam dan hukum nasional. Bantuan hukum dalam hukum nasional ditujukan bagi mereka yang tidak mampu membayar penasihat hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis empiris. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa pemberian hak bantuan hukum prodeo dalam hukum Islam dan hukum nasional mempunyai tujuan yang sama yaitu mewujudkan keadilan. Terdapat perbedaan pada sumber hukumnya. Hukum Islam bersumber pada al-Quran, Hadits, dan ijtihad. Sumber hukum nasional adalah UUD 1945, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2011 tentang Bantuan Hukum. Sumber dana bantuan hukum dalam hukum Islam dari baital mal. Sedangkan dalam hukum Nasional bersumber dari anggaran Mahkamah Agung dan APBA. Letak perbedaan pada sumber hukum keduanya, sumber pembiayaan dari pemenuhan hak bantuan hukum prodeo dan dalam hal kategori orang-orang yang menerima bantuan hukum prodeo, namun mempunyai tujuan yang sama yaitu perwujudan keadilan. Prodeo Legal Aid in Islamic Law and National Law This study aims to analyze the differences between the legal aid rights in the concept of Islamic law and national law. Legal aid in national law is aimed at those who cannot afford legal counsel. This research uses empirical juridical research methods. The study found that the granting of prodeo legal aid in Islamic law and national law had the same goal of realizing justice. There is a difference in the legal source. Islamic law is based on the Al-qur’an, Hadith and ijtihad. However, national legal sources are the 1945 Constitution and Law Number 16/2011 concerning Legal Aid. The source of funding for legal aid in Islamic law comes from Baital Mall. Whereas in National law sourced from the budget of the Supreme Court and APBA. Although there are differences in legal sources, sources of financing and differences in the categories of people who receive prodeo legal assistance, both have the same goal of realizing justice.


2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy Carroll

AbstractSection 4 of the Pakistan Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, dramatically altered the law of succession applicable to Muslims by granting to the orphaned grandchild(ren) the share that their deceased parent would have taken had s/he survived the propositus. The principle of representation incorporated in the Pakistani solution contrasts with the compulsory bequest relied upon by several Middle Eastern countries to deal with the same problem, although arguably representation more closely reflects the experience and expectations of the people of Pakistan. Nearly two decades later, the Federal Shariat Court was established and endowed with jurisdiction to declare a law contrary to "the Injunctions of Islam" and thus void. Some laws, however, were specifically exempted from the Court's jurisdiction; falling within this category is "Muslim Personal Law." A 1981 decision of the appellate Court (the Shariat Bench of the Supreme Court) held that the provisions of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance were included within the phrase "Muslim Personal Law," and were thus outside the jurisdiction of the Federal Shariat Court. This position was reversed by another decision of the appellate Court in 1993, and the provisions of the Ordinance were immediately challenged on the basis of their alleged divergence from the "Injunctions of Islam." This essay reviews the provisions of section 4 of the Ordinance and examines the decision of the Shariat Court as regards this particular provision.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (70) ◽  
pp. 33-49
Author(s):  
Sebastian Czechowicz

The article is devoted to determine the authority competent to carry out the execution of the obligation to vaccinate, as well as the authority competent to apply for punishment of those who persistently evade preventive vaccinations on the basis of the Code of Misdemeanours in Poland. After analysing the competencies of the public administration bodies and comparing them with the judicial decisions of the administrative courts and the Supreme Court issued in cases involving mandatory preventive vaccination, which present an inconsistent line of jurisprudence, the author concludes that the enforcement body is the province governor. However, it is necessary to postulate legislative changes, primarily in the area of the possible transfer of competencies from the province governor to the State Sanitary Inspection.


Author(s):  
JUAN IGARTUA SALAVERRIA

Una vez más aparecen las ambivalencias que minan la eficacia de la doctrina que, con bastantes quiebros (esa es la verdad), viene sentando el TS en torno a a motivación de los nombramientos discrecionales. En esta ocasión, no sólo se evidencia un distinto entendimiento de aquélla en resoluciones (administrativas) del CGPJ y (judiciales) de la Sala 3.ª sino ¿lo que es peor¿ en el propio seno de esta última. Berriz ere elkarren aurka dauden interpretazioak ageri dira, izendapen diskrezionalen motibazioaren inguruan Auzitegi Gorena ezartzen ari den dotrinaren eraginkortasunaren kaltetan; egia izanik ere, dotrina ezarri, gorabehera askorekin ezartzen ari dela. Oraingoan, agerikoa da interpretazio desberdinak egiten direla Botere Judizialaren Kontseilu Nagusiaren administrazio-ebazpenen eta Hirugarren Aretoaren ebazpen judizialen bitartez. Baina, are okerrago, azken aretoaren baitan ere interpretazio ezberdinak egiten dira, eta hori are txarragoa da. Once again we see the ambivalences that undermine the efficacy of the doctrine that, with quite a lot of swayings (that is true) has been established by the Supreme Court regarding the reasoning of discretional appointments. This time, not only a different understanding to the (administrative) decisions by the CGPJ and the (judicial) decisions by the Third Chamber are seen but also ¿what is worse¿ within the same latter chamber.


2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-205
Author(s):  
Melanie Guénon

This article examines the 2005 Algerian family law regulations concerning paternity and the use of DNA tests in Algerian paternity disputes. Specifically, it analyzes the relation between the methods of establishing and negating paternity recognized in Islamic law and the available genetic technology.
On the basis of three judgments of the Supreme Court, the present legislation as well as legal practice in Algeria is scrutinized. The article concludes that the Algerian legislator hesitates to dissolve the conflict between genetic technology and the recognized types of evidence of Islamic law. For now, court practice remains ‘traditional’ since judges might feel too much responsibility facing unclear regulations regarding paternity. Nevertheless, the Algerian family code reform offers the opportunity to use DNA-tests to establish nasab for both legitimate and illegitimate children. Due to unclear regulations it also paved the way to use DNA-analysis for paternity negation.*



2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-138
Author(s):  
Christopher Phiri

Abstract On 23 November 2018, the Supreme Court of Zambia delivered a judgement which suggests that Zambian judges have virtually unbridled power to move on their own motion to punish for contempt of court anyone who criticises their judicial decisions. This article considers that judgement. It argues that whilst justice might well have been done in the case in question, it was certainly not seen to be done. Two main reasons are given for this argument. First, the judges appeared to have acted both as prosecutors and adjudicators in their own cause when it was neither urgent nor imperative to act immediately on their own motion. Second, the classification by the Court of the contempt in question as civil contempt rather than criminal contempt is alien to the common law world. The article culminates in a clarion call for the Zambian legislature to intervene and clarify the law of contempt of court to avert capricious and unbridled invocation of the judicial power to punish for contempt.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document