Institutional Rules and Soft Law

Author(s):  
Ilias Bantekas
Keyword(s):  
Soft Law ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Risse ◽  
Antje Baumann

Abstract At least one surprise occurs in every arbitral hearing. One of those surprises is when a witness testifies beyond what has been submitted in his written witness statement. Often, such ‘out-of-scope’ testimony is unexpected, astonishing, and crucial for the outcome of the case. Surprisingly, the adequate handling of such unexpected testimony is unchartered territory: neither arbitral statutes, institutional rules nor the ever-expanding arbitral soft law addresses this important issue. This article reviews if and when arbitral tribunal should permit or reject such ‘out-of-scope’ testimony. The article establishes five clear-cut rules to deal with that issue.


Author(s):  
Sabrina Bruno

Climate change is a financial factor that carries with it risks and opportunities for companies. To support boards of directors of companies belonging to all jurisdictions, the World Economic Forum issued in January 2019 eight Principlescontaining both theoretical and practical provisions on: climate accountability, competence, governance, management, disclosure and dialogue. The paper analyses each Principle to understand scope and managerial consequences for boards and to evaluate whether the legal distinctions, among the various jurisdictions, may undermine the application of the Principles or, by contrast, despite the differences the Principles may be a useful and effective guidance to drive boards' of directors' conduct around the world in handling climate change challenges. Five jurisdictions are taken into consideration for this comparative analysis: Europe (and UK), US, Australia, South Africa and Canada. The conclusion is that the WEF Principles, as soft law, is the best possible instrument to address boards of directors of worldwide companies, harmonise their conduct and effectively help facing such global emergency.


2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  

Der Hypothekarkredit zu wohnungswirtschaftlichen Zwecken hat zweifelsohne das Gepräge eines Konsumentenkredits. Aber er ist ein Konsumentenkredit eigener Art: Größe des Kreditvolumens, Langfristigkeit und (zumindest beim pfandbriefrefinanzierten Kredit) Refinanzierungstechnik unterscheiden ihn deutlich von anderen Verbraucherkrediten. Er ist darum nicht Gegenstand der Verbraucherkreditrichtlinie von 1987 gewesen und auch im deutschen Verbraucherkreditgesetz nur ausschnittweise geregelt. Der Entwurf einer eigenen Hypothekarkreditrichtlinie ist schon Anfang der achtziger fahre früh auf der Strecke geblieben.Die nachstehend abgedruckte Empfehlung der Kommission ist die erste Wiederannäherung der EU an die Thematik. Regelungstechnisch handelt es sich um einen von und mit der Kreditwirtschaft ausgehandelten „code of conduct“, der, solange die Realkreditinstitute sich kodexkonform verhalten, den Erlass verbindlicher Rechtsvorschriften erübrigen soll. Die Empfehlung macht damit Ernst mit der im „Aktionsplan Finanzdienstleistungen“ (abgedruckt in: ZBB 1999, 254) verkündeten Absicht, künftig weniger auf schwerfällige und unflexible Richtliniengesetzgebung und stattdessen auf Rahmenregelungen oder auch (wie hier) auf „soft law“ zu setzen, welches mit den beteiligten Wirtschaftskreisen abgestimmt wird. Tradition hat inzwischen auch die Methode, an Stelle der Statuierung materieller Leistungsstandards dem Verbraucher Konditionentransparenz durch vorvertragliche Information zu verschaffen. Im konkreten Detail wird man in den Empfehlungen wenig finden, was nicht entweder zu den Pflichtangaben nach §4 VerbrKrG zählt oder längst schon deutsche AGB-Rechtsprechung zum Hypothekarkredit oder eingebürgerte AGB-Praxis der Realkreditgeber ist. Im Hinblick auf das Risiko vorfälliger Tilgung von Festzinskrediten wird man immerhin begrüßen, daß dem Kreditnehmer die Unterschiede zwischen variablem und Festzinskredit bzw. möglichen Mischformen (Abschnittfinanzierung) klar zu machen und er über die (unter Umständen eingeschränkte) Möglichkeit vorfälliger Tilgung zu informieren ist. Diese Beratung wird den Instituten nicht leichtfallen, falls der Gesetzgeber tatsächlich die verunglückte BGH-Rechtsprechung zu Grund und Grenzen der Vorfälligkeitstilgung im BGB festschreibt (BGH ZIP 1997, 1641 = ZflR 1997, 596 = BGHZ 136, 161, dazu EWiR 1997, 921 (Medicus); jetzt §487 Abs. 2 BGB in der Fassung des „konsolidierten Diskussionsentwurfs“ eines Schuldrechtsmodernisierungsgesetzes vom Februar 2001).


Revista Foco ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 110
Author(s):  
Rafaella Cristina Campos ◽  
Natália Fernandes Fonseca ◽  
Odemir Vieira Baeta

O objetivo é averiguar a correlação dos fatores motivacionais e produtivos no contexto institucional da Polícia Civil. O estudo de caso foi conduzido por entrevistas em profundidade com um Delegado de Polícia, um Investigador de Polícia, e um Escrivão de Polícia. A análise de conteúdo foi utilizada. Conclui-se que há evidente correlação entre o desenvolvimento de artefatos motivacionais, sejam eles de ordem ambiental ou individual, com a produtividade na instituição da Polícia Civil. Destaca-se também, que apesar do controle e avaliação dos índices de produtividade serem predominantemente burocráticos, institucionalizados e legitimados, a ligação que se estabelece com a manifestação dos artefatos motivacionais é subjetiva, relacional e intangível nas normas institucionais. Destaca-se este evento neste artigo, porque como foi visto anteriormente, tanto a natureza do trabalho, quanto o ambiente da Polícia Civil, estão em total desencontro ao desenvolvimento de produtividade e motivação no sentido clássico destas vertentes. The aims is to determine the correlation of the motivational and productive factors in the institutional context of the Civil Police. The case study was conducted by in-depth interviews with a Chief of Police, Police Investigator, and Actuary Police. The content analysis was used for fixed grid. It is concluded that there is clear correlation between the development of motivational artifacts, whether environmental or individual order, with productivity in the civil police institution. Also noteworthy is that despite the control and evaluation of productivity indexes were predominantly bureaucratic, institutionalized and legitimized, the connection that is established with the manifestation of motivational artifacts is subjective, relational and intangible assets in the institutional rules. It highlights this event in this article, because as discussed above, both the nature of the work, as the environment of the Civil Police, are in complete disagreement with the development of productivity and motivation in the classical sense of the aforementioned areas.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
P.P. Myslivsky ◽  
◽  
I.N. Shchurova

In international law, there are sources that do not formally have binding force, but may indicate the emergence of the opinio juris of states, as well as emerging practice. The Eurasian Economic Union also issues acts that are not formally binding: they are adopted by the Eurasian Economic Commission in the form of recommendations. In addition, the Union takes into account the recommendatory acts of other international organizations. At present, the practice of the EAEU Court indicates that this body takes into account “soft law” in the course of argumentation, but proceeds from the impossibility of challenging acts that are recommendations of the EEC. The authors give ways to establish the possibility of challenging the EEC recommendations in the EAEU Court.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document