scholarly journals P118: Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score as a predictor for readmission in acute pulmonary embolism in emergency department?

CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (S1) ◽  
pp. S98-S99
Author(s):  
D. Prajapati ◽  
D. Suryanarayan ◽  
E. S. Lang
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Readmission Rate ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Patient Disposition ◽  
Discharged Patients

Introduction: Pulmonary Embolism (PE) management in Emergency Department (ED) confers a substantial cost burden representing opportunities for improvements in decision-making. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) is a validated tool to prognosticate patients with PE supporting admit versus (vs.) discharge decisions from the ED. Despite existing evidence, PESI is under-used in patients with PE. We sought to evaluate PESI scores and patient disposition from 4 EDs within Calgary to determine discordance between them and the effect of the discordance on readmission and mortality. Methods: Retrospective review of adult patients 18 years, diagnosed with PE between January-June 2016 at 4 EDs in Calgary Health Region. Patients were divided into high-risk PESI (score>85) and low-risk PESI (score 0-85). Chi-Square (2) test was used for comparison between the groups. Primary outcome measure was rate of discordance between PESI risk and disposition decision and identify factors driving the discordance. Secondary outcome measures included comparing 30-day readmission rate, 30-day and 90-day mortality between the discordant PESI groups. Results: 365 patients were diagnosed with PE in the study period with 60% being admitted and 40% discharged. The median PESI score in admitted patients was 85 (26-172) vs. 68 (20-163) in discharged patients. 51% of admitted patients had a low-risk PESI score and 24% of the discharged patients were high-risk PESI. 30-day readmission rate was 22.9% vs 5.3% (p=0.002) in discharged patients with high-risk PESI vs. discharged patients with low-risk PESI. Hypoxemia was the most common (62%) justification for admission in low-risk PESI groups. Among discharged patients we noted an 8.6% 90-day mortality in the high-risk vs. 0% in the low-risk PESI groups. Conclusion: Discharging a PE patient from the ED with a high PESI score carries a significant risk of ED revisit and readmission. Hypoxia was the reason for admission in majority of low risk PE patients.

scholarly journals Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?

Thrombosis ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Shafiq ◽  
Hamza Lodhi ◽  
Zaheer Ahmed ◽  
Ata Bajwa
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Acute Pe

Background. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score can risk-stratify patients with PE but its widespread use is uncertain. With the PESI, we compared length of hospital stay between low, moderate, and high risk PE patients and determined the number of low risk PE patients who were discharged early. Methods. PE patients admitted to St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital from January 2005 to August 2010 were screened. PESI score stratified acute PE patients into low (<85), moderate (86–105), and high (>105) risk categories and their length of hospital stay was compared. Patients with low risk PE discharged early (≤3 days) were calculated. Results. Among 315 PE patients, 51.7% were at low risk. No significant difference in hospital stay between low (7.11 ± 3 d) and moderate (6.88 ± 2.9 d) risk, p > 0.05, as well as low and high risk (7.28 ± 3.0 d), p > 0.05, was found. 9% of low risk patients were discharged ≤ 3 days. Conclusions. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay between low and high risk groups and only a small number of low risk patients were discharged from the hospital early suggesting that risk tools like PESI may not have a widespread use.

scholarly journals Prospective comparative evaluation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 1-hour and a 2-hour rapid diagnostic algorithm for myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity troponin-T

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 712-720
Author(s):  
James E. Andruchow ◽  
Timothy Boyne ◽  
Isolde Seiden-Long ◽  
Dongmei Wang ◽  
Shabnam Vatanpour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Troponin T ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Patient Disposition ◽  
High Sensitivity Troponin

ABSTRACTObjectiveBoth 1- and 2-hour rapid diagnostic algorithms using high-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTn) have been validated to diagnose acute myocardial infarction (MI), leaving physicians uncertain which algorithm is preferable. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of 1- and 2-hour algorithms in clinical practice in a Canadian emergency department (ED).MethodsED patients with chest pain had high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-T (hs-cTnT) collected on presentation and 1- and 2-hours later at a single academic centre over a 2-year period. The primary outcome was index MI, and the secondary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE). All outcomes were adjudicated.ResultsWe enrolled 608 patients undergoing serial hs-cTnT sampling. Of these, 350 had a valid 1-hour and 550 had a 2-hour hs-cTnT sample. Index MI and 30-day MACE prevalence was ~12% and 14%. Sensitivity of the 1- and 2-hour algorithms was similar for index MI 97.3% (95% CI: 85.8–99.9%) and 100% (95% CI: 91.6–100%) and 30-day MACE: 80.9% (95% CI: 66.7–90.9%) and 83.3% (95% CI: 73.2–90.8%), respectively. Both algorithms accurately identified about 10% of patients as high risk.ConclusionsBoth algorithms were able to classify almost two-thirds of patients as low risk, effectively ruling out MI and conferring a low risk of 30-day MACE for this group, while reliably identifying high-risk patients. While both algorithms had equivalent diagnostic performance, the 2-hour algorithm offers several practical advantages, which may make it preferable to implement. Broad implementation of similar algorithms across Canada can expedite patient disposition and lead to resource savings.

scholarly journals Anticoagulant therapies for acute venous thromboembolism: a comparison between those discharged directly from the emergency department versus hospital in two Canadian cities

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e022063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tammy J Bungard ◽  
Bruce Ritchie ◽  
Jennifer Bolt ◽  
William M Semchuk
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Acute Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Record Review ◽  
Deep Vein

ObjectiveTo compare the characteristics/management of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) for patients either discharged directly from the emergency department (ED) or hospitalised throughout a year within two urban cities in Canada.DesignRetrospective medical record review.SettingHospitals in Edmonton, Alberta (n=4) and Regina, Saskatchewan (n=2) from April 2014 to March 2015.ParticipantsAll patients discharged from the ED or hospital with acute deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (PE). Those having another indication for anticoagulant therapy, pregnant/breast feeding or anticipated lifespan <3 months were excluded.Primary and secondary outcomesPrimarily, to compare proportion of patients receiving traditional therapy (parenteral anticoagulant±warfarin) relative to a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) between the two cohorts. Secondarily, to assess differences with therapy selected based on clot burden and follow-up plans postdischarge.Results387 (25.2%) and 665 (72.5%) patients from the ED and hospital cohorts, respectively, were included. Compared with the ED cohort, those hospitalised were older (57.3 and 64.5 years; p<0.0001), more likely to have PE (35.7% vs 83.8%) with a simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) ≥1 (31.2% vs 65.2%), cancer (14.7% and 22.3%; p=0.003) and pulmonary disease (10.1% and 20.6%; p<0.0001). For the ED and hospital cohorts, similar proportions of patients were prescribed traditional therapies (72.6% and 71.1%) and a DOAC (25.8% and 27.4%, respectively). For the ED cohort, DOAC use was similar between those with a sPESI score of 0 and ≥1 (35.1% and 34.9%, p=0.98) whereas for those hospitalised lower risk patients were more likely to receive a DOAC (31.4% and 23.8%, p<0.055). Follow-up was most common with family physicians for those hospitalised (51.5%), while specialists/VTE clinic was most common for those directly discharged from the ED (50.6%).ConclusionsTraditional and DOAC therapies were proportionately similar between the ED and hospitalised cohorts, despite clear differences in patient populations and follow-up patterns in the community.

scholarly journals Features of in-hospital clinical course of pulmonary embolism in patients of different age groups

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 2423
Author(s):  
E. A. Shmidt ◽  
S. A. Berns ◽  
A. G. Neeshpapa ◽  
P. A. Talyzin ◽  
I. I. Zhidkova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Diastolic Pressure ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Statistical Processing ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Cardiovascular Comorbidity ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Comorbidity Status

Aim. To study the clinical course and management of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) of various age groups hospitalized in a cardiology hospital.Material and methods. This prospective single-center study in the period from 2016 to 2018 included 154 patients with PE verified by computed tomography. Statistical processing was conducted using the MedCalcVersion 16.2.1 software package (Softwa, Belgium).Results. In all groups, female patients dominated, but the highest number of women (70,7%) belonged to the group of senile patients, while in the group <60 years, only half of patients with PE were women. Comorbid cardiovascular disease and deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed in eldest patients significantly more often than in those <60 years of age. The highest prevalence of cancer and recurrent PE were identified in the group of elderly patients. Thrombolytic therapy was performed most often in patients 60-75 years old, since these patients had a high risk of 30-day mortality according to Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index, but did not have severe comorbidities, as patients older than 75 years. An increase of right atrium size was found in the group of elderly and senile patients in comparison with patients <60 years. The highest pulmonary artery systolic and diastolic pressure was observed in the patients older than 75 years.Conclusion. In the Kemerovo Oblast, PE most often develops in patients aged 60-75 years and is characterized by a more severe clinical course compared with patients younger than 60 years. Patients over the 60 years of age have severe cardiovascular comorbidity status, atrial fibrillation/flutter and recurrent PE. Surgical treatment for senile patients is limited due to the high risk of postoperative complications, which specifies high mortality. Patients <60 years of age are a third of all patients hospitalized with PE. They have a low risk of mortality, but have an unfavorable course of the hospital period.

scholarly journals ПОРІВНЯЛЬНА ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКА ФАКТОРІВ РИЗИКУ

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
І. К. Чурпій
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Electrolyte Composition ◽  
Terminal Phase ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
History Of

<p>To optimize the therapeutic tactics and improve the treatment of peritonitis on the basis of retrospective analysis there are determined the significant risk factors: female gender, age 60 – 90 years, time to hospitalization for more than 48 hours, a history of myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac arrhythmia, biliary, fecal and fibrinous purulent exudate, the terminal phase flow, operations with resection of the intestine and postoperative complications such as pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, pleurisy, early intestinal obstruction. Changes in the electrolyte composition of blood and lower albumin &lt;35 % of high risk prognostic course of peritonitis that requires immediate correction in the pre-and postoperative periods. The combination of three or more risk factors for various systems, creating a negative outlook for further treatment and the patient's life.</p>

scholarly journals Pulmonary embolism in old age: usefulness of risk stratification in clinical decision-making

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Bova ◽  
Vitaliano Spagnuolo ◽  
Alfonso Noto
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Early Complications ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Risk Of Death

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease with a not negligible short-term risk of death, in particular in the elderly. An adequate evaluation of the prognosis in patients with PE may guide decision-making in terms of the intensity of the initial treatment during the acute phase. Patients with shock or persistent hypotension are at high risk of early mortality and may benefit from immediate reperfusion. Several tools are available to define the short-term prognosis of hemodynamically stable patients. The pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) score, and the simplified PESI score are particularly useful for identifying patients at low risk of early complications who might be safely treated at home. The identification of patients who are hemodynamically stable at diagnosis but are at a high risk of early complications is more challenging. Current guidelines recommend a multi-parametric prognostic algorithm based on the clinical status, biomarkers and imaging tests. However an aggressive treatment in hemodynamically stable patients is still controversial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document