scholarly journals Beyond the limits - ECPR in putative fatal circumstances

CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (S2) ◽  
pp. S70-S73
Author(s):  
Ingo Graeff ◽  
Sylvia Schacher ◽  
Stefan Lenkeit ◽  
Catherine N. Widmann ◽  
Jens-Christian Schewe
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Water Immersion ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Prognostic Indicators ◽  
European Resuscitation Council ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Arterial Blood Gas ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AbstractThe eligibility criteria for applying extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in patients with cardiac arrest are currently unclear. For those patients with hypothermic cardiac arrest, the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Guidelines recommend considering ECPR only for patients with potassium <8 mmol/L and a body temperature below 32°C, whereas the American Heart Association Guidelines (AHA) do not express this in a specific manner.We report the case of an urban unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient found with her head immersed in water at a temperature of 23°C. The patient presented an unclear history and a dire combination of clinical and laboratory parameters (asystole, arterial blood gas: pH 6.8, potassium 8.3 mmol/L, lactate 16.0 mmol/L). Despite these poor prognostic indicators, ECPR was initiated after 95 minutes of CPR and the patient survived with a good neurological outcome.This case highlights the uncertainty in ECPR eligibility and prognostication, especially in those with hypothermia and water immersion for whom aggressive therapies may be warranted. Further data and improved strategies are required to delineate candidacy for this resource-intensive procedure better.

scholarly journals Out of hospital cardiac arrest in Western Sydney - an analysis of outcomes and estimation of future eCPR eligibility

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pramod Chandru ◽  
Tatum Priyambada Mitra ◽  
Nitesh Dutt Dhanekula ◽  
Mark Dennis ◽  
Adam Eslick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Refractory out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with extremely poor outcomes. However, in selected patients extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be an effective rescue therapy, allowing time treat reversible causes. The primary goal was to estimate the potential future caseload of eCPR at historically 'low-volume' extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) centres. Methods A 3-year observational study of OHCA presenting to the Emergency Department (ED of an urban referral centre without historical protocolised use of eCPR. Demographics and standard Utstein outcomes are reported. Further, an a priori analysis of each case for potential eCPR eligibility was conducted. A current eCPR selection criteria (from the 2-CHEER study) was used to determine eligibly. Results In the study window 248 eligible cardiac arrest cases were included in the OHCA registry. 30-day survival was 23.4% (n=58). The mean age of survivors was 55.4 years. 17 (6.8%) cases were deemed true refractory arrests and fulfilled the 2-CHEER eligibility criteria. The majority of these cases presented within “office hours” and no case obtained a return of spontaneous circulation standard advanced life support. Conclusions In this contemporary OHCA registry a significant number of refractory cases were deemed potential eCPR candidates reflecting a need for future interdisciplinary work to support delivery of this therapy.

Association between early arterial blood gas tensions and neurological outcome in adult patients following in-hospital cardiac arrest

Resuscitation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Hung Wang ◽  
Chien-Hua Huang ◽  
Wei-Tien Chang ◽  
Min-Shan Tsai ◽  
Tsung-Chien Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Blood Gas ◽  
Arterial Blood Gas ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Evaluation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation eligibility criteria for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan Lee ◽  
Adam Clay ◽  
Eric Sy
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
University Of Michigan ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
University Of British Columbia ◽  
The University ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the number of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients eligible for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in Saskatchewan and their clinical outcomes, including survival and neurological outcomes at discharge. ECPR eligibility was assessed, using clinical criteria from the University of British Columbia (UBC), University of Michigan (UM), University of California (UC) and a restrictive ECPR criteria. Results We performed a retrospective cohort study of 200 OHCA patients (August 1, 2017-May 31, 2019) in Regina, Saskatchewan. Sixty-one (30%) were female, the median age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 52–78), the median CPR duration was 30 minutes (IQR 12–47), and 20% survived to discharge. Two (1%) patients received ECPR but did not meet any ECPR criteria. Nineteen (10%), thirty (15%), twenty-two (11%), and seven (4%) patients were ECPR-eligible, using the UBC, UM, UC, and restrictive criteria. However, none of these patients had received ECPR. Only two (11%), two (7%), two (9%), and one (14%) of these patient(s) survived to discharge, respectively. Neurological outcomes were unfavourable among all ECPR-eligible patients. Future study at our centre will be necessary on how to implement ECPR program to further improve these outcomes.

Abstract 154: Hyperoxemia is Associated with Poor Neurological Outcomes in Patients with Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Rescued by Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Insight From the Nationwide Multicenter Observational JAAM-OHCA (Japan Association for Acute Medicine) Registry

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaaki Nishihara ◽  
Ken-ichi Hiasa ◽  
Nobuyuki Enzan ◽  
Kenzo Ichimura ◽  
Takeshi Iyonaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Acute Medicine ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
And Control ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Previous studies have shown an association between hyperoxemia and mortality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); however, the evidence is lacking in patients receiving extracorporeal CPR (ECPR). Hypothesis: To test the hypothesis that hyperoxemia is associated with poor neurological outcome in patients treated by ECPR. Methods: The Japanese Association for Acute Medicine - OHCA (JAAM-OHCA) Registry is a multicenter, prospective, observational registry including 34,754 OHCA patients between 2014 and 2017. Patients who had been resuscitated and survived 24 hours after OHCA and had a PaO 2 levels above 60 mmHg were included. Eligible patients were divided into 2 groups by each 2 definition according to the PaO 2 levels measured from arterial blood gas analysis 24-h after the ECPR, (1) High-level of PaO 2 (H-PaO 2 , n=242) as PaO 2 ≥ 157 mmHg (median) and control (n=211) as 60 < PaO 2 < 157 mmHg, (2) hyperoxemia (HO, n=80) as PaO 2 ≥ 300 mmHg and control (n=373) as 60 < PaO 2 < 300 mmHg. The primary and secondary outcomes were the favorable neurological outcome, defined as Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) Scale 1-2, and survival at 30 days after OHCA, respectively. Results: Out of 34,754 patients with OHCA, 453 patients with ECPR were included. The number of CPC 1-2 was significantly lower in the H-PaO 2 and HO group compared with each control group (H-PaO 2 : 17.4% vs. 33.2%; Odds ratio [OR] 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.66; P<0.0001, HO: 8.8% vs. 28.2%; OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.11-0.55; P<0.001). The 30-day survival was lower in these high oxygen groups (H-PaO 2 : 39.3% vs. 57.4%; OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.33-0.70; P<0.0001, HO: 25.0% vs. 52.6%; OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.17-0.52; P<0.0001). After adjusting for potential confounders, the H-PaO 2 and HO were associated with unfavorable neurological outcomes (adjusted OR, H-PaO 2 ; 2.71; 95% CI 1.16-6.30; P=0.021, HO; 5.76; 95% CI 1.30-25.4; P=0.021). The H-PaO 2 and HO were also associated with poor 30-day survival (adjusted OR, H-PaO 2 ; 2.28; 95% CI 1.13-4.60; P=0.021, HO; 3.75; 95% CI 1.28-11.0; P=0.016). Conclusions: Hyperoxemia was associated with worse neurological outcomes in OHCA patients with ECPR.

scholarly journals Effect of Optimized Versus Guidelines‐Based Automated External Defibrillator Placement on Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest Coverage: An In Silico Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher L. F. Sun ◽  
Lena Karlsson ◽  
Laurie J. Morrison ◽  
Steven C. Brooks ◽  
Fredrik Folke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
In Silico ◽  
Road Network ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Mathematical Optimization ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Automated External Defibrillator ◽  
European Resuscitation Council ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
External Defibrillator

Background Mathematical optimization of automated external defibrillator (AED) placement may improve AED accessibility and out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes compared with American Heart Association (AHA) and European Resuscitation Council (ERC) placement guidelines. We conducted an in silico trial (simulated prospective cohort study) comparing mathematically optimized placements with placements derived from current AHA and ERC guidelines, which recommend placement in locations where OHCAs are usually witnessed. Methods and Results We identified all public OHCAs of presumed cardiac cause from 2008 to 2016 in Copenhagen, Denmark. For the control, we computationally simulated placing 24/7‐accessible AEDs at every unique, public, witnessed OHCA location at monthly intervals over the study period. The intervention consisted of an equal number of simulated AEDs placements, deployed monthly, at mathematically optimized locations, using a model that analyzed historical OHCAs before that month. For each approach, we calculated the number of OHCAs in the study period that occurred within a 100‐m route distance based on Copenhagen’s road network of an available AED after it was placed (“OHCA coverage”). Estimated impact on bystander defibrillation and 30‐day survival was calculated by multivariate logistic regression. The control scenario involved 393 AEDs at historical, public, witnessed OHCA locations, covering 15.8% of the 653 public OHCAs from 2008 to 2016. The optimized locations provided significantly higher coverage (24.2%; P <0.001). Estimated bystander defibrillation and 30‐day survival rates increased from 15.6% to 18.2% ( P <0.05) and from 32.6% to 34.0% ( P <0.05), respectively. As a baseline, the 1573 real AEDs in Copenhagen covered 14.4% of the OHCAs. Conclusions Mathematical optimization can significantly improve OHCA coverage and estimated clinical outcomes compared with a guidelines‐based approach to AED placement.

scholarly journals Evaluation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation eligibility criteria for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan Lee ◽  
Adam Clay ◽  
Eric Sy
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
University Of British Columbia ◽  
The University ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the number of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients eligible for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in Saskatchewan and their clinical outcomes, including survival and neurological outcomes at discharge. ECPR eligibility was assessed, using clinical criteria from the University of British Columbia (UBC, Canada), University of Michigan (UM, United States), University of California (UC, United States) and a restrictive ECPR criteria. Results We performed a retrospective cohort study of 200 OHCA patients (August 1, 2017-May 31, 2019) in Regina, Saskatchewan. Sixty-one (30%) were female, the median age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 52–78), the median CPR duration was 30 min (IQR 12–47), and 20% survived to discharge. Two (1%) patients received ECPR but did not meet any ECPR criteria. Nineteen (10%), thirty (15%), twenty-two (11%), and seven (4%) patients were ECPR-eligible, using the UBC, UM, UC, and restrictive criteria. However, none of these patients had received ECPR. Only two (11%), two (7%), two (9%), and one (14%) of these patient(s) survived to discharge, respectively. Neurological outcomes were unfavourable among all ECPR-eligible patients. Future study at our centre will be necessary on how to implement ECPR program to further improve these outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document