scholarly journals Patients' perceptions of self-management of high blood pressure in three low- and middle-income countries: findings from the BPMONITOR study

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tala Al-Rousan ◽  
M. Amalia Pesantes ◽  
Sufia Dadabhai ◽  
Namratha R. Kandula ◽  
Mark D. Huffman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
High Blood Pressure ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Self Monitoring ◽  
Caregiver Support ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Perceptions And Attitudes ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract Hypertension is the leading risk factor for global disease burden. Self-management of high blood pressure (BP) through self-monitoring and self-titration of medications, has proved to be one successful and cost-effective tool to achieve better BP control in many high-income countries but not much is known about its potential in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We used semi-structured questionnaires and focus groups in three LMICs; Peru, Cameroon and Malawi to examine perceptions and attitudes of patients diagnosed with essential hypertension towards living with hypertension, BP measurement and treatment, patient–physician relationship and opinions about self-management of high blood pressure. Results in all three countries were comparable. Patients showed varied levels of health literacy related to hypertension. BP measurement habits were mostly affected by resources available and caregiver support. Treatment and adherence to it were primarily affected by cost. Most patients were welcoming of the idea of self-management but skeptical about the ability to do self-monitoring accurately and the safety involving self-titration of medications.

scholarly journals Hypertension in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

2021 ◽  
Vol 128 (7) ◽  
pp. 808-826
Author(s):  
Aletta E. Schutte ◽  
Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy ◽  
Sailesh Mohan ◽  
Dorairaj Prabhakaran
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Health Care Staff ◽  
Significant Shift ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

In recent decades low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have been witnessing a significant shift toward raised blood pressure; yet in LMICs, only 1 in 3 are aware of their hypertension status, and ≈8% have their blood pressure controlled. This rising burden widens the inequality gap, contributes to massive economic hardships of patients and carers, and increases costs to the health system, facing challenges such as low physician-to-patient ratios and lack of access to medicines. Established risk factors include unhealthy diet (high salt and low fruit and vegetable intake), physical inactivity, tobacco and alcohol use, and obesity. Emerging risk factors include pollution (air, water, noise, and light), urbanization, and a loss of green space. Risk factors that require further in-depth research are low birth weight and social and commercial determinants of health. Global actions include the HEARTS technical package and the push for universal health care. Promising research efforts highlight that successful interventions are feasible in LMICs. These include creation of health-promoting environments by introducing salt-reduction policies and sugar and alcohol tax; implementing cost-effective screening and simplified treatment protocols to mitigate treatment inertia; pooled procurement of low-cost single-pill combination therapy to improve adherence; increasing access to telehealth and mHealth (mobile health); and training health care staff, including community health workers, to strengthen team-based care. As the blood pressure trajectory continues creeping upward in LMICs, contextual research on effective, safe, and cost-effective interventions is urgent. New emergent risk factors require novel solutions. Lowering blood pressure in LMICs requires urgent global political and scientific priority and action.

scholarly journals Achieving Viral Suppression in 90% of People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus on Antiretroviral Therapy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (10) ◽  
pp. 1487-1491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean B Nachega ◽  
Nadia A Sam-Agudu ◽  
Lynne M Mofenson ◽  
Mauro Schechter ◽  
John W Mellors
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Viral Suppression ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract Although significant progress has been made, the latest data from low- and middle-income countries show substantial gaps in reaching the third “90%” (viral suppression) of the UNAIDS 90-90-90 goals, especially among vulnerable and key populations. This article discusses critical gaps and promising, evidence-based solutions. There is no simple and/or single approach to achieve the last 90%. This will require multifaceted, scalable strategies that engage people living with human immunodeficiency virus, motivate long-term treatment adherence, and are community-entrenched and ‑supported, cost-effective, and tailored to a wide range of global communities.

scholarly journals Factors that influence patient empowerment in inpatient chronic care: early thoughts on a diabetes care intervention in South Africa

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Abrahams ◽  
Lucy Gilson ◽  
Naomi S. Levitt ◽  
Joel A. Dave
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Diabetes Care ◽  
Chronic Care ◽  
Patient Empowerment ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract Background The burden of non-communicable diseases is growing rapidly in low- and middle-income countries. Research suggests that health interventions that aim to improve patient self-management and empower patients to care actively for their disease will improve health outcomes over the long-term. There is, however, a gap in the literature about the potential role of the inpatient setting in supporting chronic care. This is particularly important in low-and-middle income countries where hospitals may be a rare prolonged point of contact between patient and health provider. The aim of this small scale, exploratory study was to understand what factors within the inpatient setting may affect patients’ feelings of empowerment in relation to their chronic disease care and provides recommendations for future inpatient-based interventions to support self-management of disease. Methods This study was based in a public, academic hospital in South Africa. Eighteen qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted with multiple participants with experience of diabetes care: inpatients and health professionals such as nurses, endocrinologists, and dieticians. Findings were analysed using a broad, exploratory, thematic approach, guided by self-management and chronic care literature. Results Interviews with both patients and providers suggest that patients living in low socio-economic contexts are likely to struggle to access appropriate healthcare information and services, and may often have financial and emotional priorities that take precedence over their chronic illness. Younger people may also be more dependent on their family and community, giving them less ability to take control of their disease care and lifestyle. In addition, hospital care remains bound by an acute care model; and the inpatient setting of focus is characterised by perceived staff shortages and ineffective communication that undermine the implementation of patient empowerment-focused interventions. Conclusions Patient and provider contexts are likely to make supporting patient engagement in long-term chronic care difficult in lower income settings. However, knowledge of these factors can be harnessed to improve chronic care interventions in South Africa and other similar countries.

scholarly journals Strategies to Improve Stroke Care Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 45-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeyaraj Durai Pandian ◽  
Akanksha G. William ◽  
Mahesh P. Kate ◽  
Bo Norrving ◽  
George A. Mensah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Stroke Services ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Background: The burden of stroke in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is large and increasing, challenging the already stretched health-care services. Aims and Objectives: To determine the quality of existing stroke-care services in LMICs and to highlight indigenous, inexpensive, evidence-based implementable strategies being used in stroke-care. Methods: A detailed literature search was undertaken using PubMed and Google scholar from January 1966 to October 2015 using a range of search terms. Of 921 publications, 373 papers were shortlisted and 31 articles on existing stroke-services were included. Results: We identified efficient models of ambulance transport and pre-notification. Stroke Units (SU) are available in some countries, but are relatively sparse and mostly provided by the private sector. Very few patients were thrombolysed; this could be increased with telemedicine and governmental subsidies. Adherence to secondary preventive drugs is affected by limited availability and affordability, emphasizing the importance of primary prevention. Training of paramedics, care-givers and nurses in post-stroke care is feasible. Conclusion: In this systematic review, we found several reports on evidence-based implementable stroke services in LMICs. Some strategies are economic, feasible and reproducible but remain untested. Data on their outcomes and sustainability is limited. Further research on implementation of locally and regionally adapted stroke-services and cost-effective secondary prevention programs should be a priority.

scholarly journals Wastewater-Based Epidemiology for Cost-Effective Mass Surveillance of COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Challenges and Opportunities

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 2897
Author(s):  
Sadhana Shrestha ◽  
Emi Yoshinaga ◽  
Saroj K. Chapagain ◽  
Geetha Mohan ◽  
Alexandros Gasparatos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Population Size ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Wastewater Management ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
Mass Surveillance ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) is an approach that can be used to estimate COVID-19 prevalence in the population by detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA in wastewater. As the WBE approach uses pooled samples from the study population, it is an inexpensive and non-invasive mass surveillance method compared to individual testing. Thus, it offers a good complement in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) facing high costs of testing or social stigmatization, and it has a huge potential to monitor SARS-CoV-2 and its variants to curb the global COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this review is to systematize the current evidence about the application of the WBE approach in mass surveillance of COVID-19 infection in LMICs, as well as its future potential. Among other parameters, population size contributing the fecal input to wastewater is an important parameter for COVID-19 prevalence estimation. It is easier to back-calculate COVID-19 prevalence in the community with centralized wastewater systems, because there can be more accurate estimates about the size of contributing population in the catchment. However, centralized wastewater management systems are often of low quality (or even non-existent) in LMICs, which raises a major concern about the ability to implement the WBE approach. However, it is possible to mobilize the WBE approach, if large areas are divided into sub-areas, corresponding to the existing wastewater management systems. In addition, a strong coordination between stakeholders is required for estimating population size respective to wastewater management systems. Nevertheless, further international efforts should be leveraged to strengthen the sanitation infrastructures in LMICs, using the lessons gathered from the current COVID-19 pandemic to be prepared for future pandemics.

scholarly journals Building youth and family resilience for better mental health: developing and testing a hybrid model of intervention in low- and middle-income countries

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Debasish Basu ◽  
Sugandha Nagpal ◽  
Renjith R. Pillai ◽  
Victoria Mutiso ◽  
David Ndetei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Beliefs ◽  
Hybrid Model ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Family Resilience ◽  
Childhood Experiences ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Summary Resilience is a dynamic, multi-level, multi-systemic process of positive adaptation at the individual, family and community levels. Promoting resilience can be a cost-effective form of preventive and early intervention, offering significant health advantages for young people throughout their lives. Developing resiliency interventions for youth and their families in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly in the context of the ongoing pandemic, is especially important given a lack of services and trained specialists, and poor levels of public spend on mental health, alongside marked and clustered psychosocial disadvantages and adverse childhood experiences. We propose a ‘hybrid’ model targeting 10- to 17 year-old children and their families, and options to engage through communities, schools and the family unit. These options will enhance individual and family resilience, and possibly buffer against adversity. The adaptations respect cultural and health beliefs, take account of structural drivers of inequalities and are suitable for LMICs.

scholarly journals Self-monitoring of blood pressure to improve hypertension management in a middle-income country: A proof of concept study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christelle Akl ◽  
Nadine Rashidi ◽  
Chaza Akik ◽  
Eveline Hitti ◽  
Ghassan Hamadeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
The Self ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Self Monitoring ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Monitoring Group

Abstract Background Self-monitoring of blood pressure has been shown to optimize the management of blood pressure in high-income settings, but there is less evidence from low-to-middle income countries. We designed a proof-of-concept pilot trial to assess the feasibility and acceptability of an intervention built around self-monitoring of blood pressure and health education, and to measure its association with reduced blood pressure among hypertensives. The study was conducted in Lebanon, a country where the management of hypertension presents challenges similar to those faced in countries of the Arab region and other middle-income countries. Methods We conducted a parallel two-arm pilot trial with a mixed-method approach to investigate the effect of the intervention on patient experience. Hypertensive patients (n = 80) were recruited at two primary and one tertiary health centers in Beirut, and were randomly allocated (1:1) to either an intervention group where patients received blood pressure devices, diaries and educational sessions, or a control group where patients received standard of care as practiced in their health centers. The main outcomes were feasibility (recruitment, retention and adherence), acceptability, and changes in systolic blood pressure. Quantitative and qualitative data were obtained at baseline and 6 weeks later. Results The recruitment rates for the study was 52% and retention was 95%. Most participants in the self-monitoring group (33/38) reported that the device was convenient and easy to use. Complete case analysis showed that blood pressure monitoring was associated with a greater reduction in systolic (-6.3 mmHg, 95%CI [-12.4; − 0.17]) and diastolic (-1.9 mmHg, 95%CI [-6.34; 2.58]) blood pressure in the self-monitoring group (n = 36) as compared to the standard of care group (n = 36). Improved knowledge of hypertension was also observed in the self-monitoring group. There were no adverse events related to study participation. Conclusions Self-monitoring is acceptable and feasible and has the potential to improve hypertension management. Our results should be further tested in trials with adequate statistical power and longer follow-up periods to examine the effectiveness of the intervention on blood pressure levels. Trial Registration and funding: Retrospectively Registered on April 3, 2020. ISRCTN 16450193. Funded by the Harvard Medical School Center for Global Health Delivery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document