scholarly journals Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of migrants to Ireland presenting with a first episode of psychosis

Author(s):  
B. O’Donoghue ◽  
S. Sexton ◽  
J. P. Lyne ◽  
E. Roche ◽  
N. Mifsud ◽  
...  

Objectives: When presenting with a first episode of psychosis (FEP), migrants can have different demographic and clinical characteristics to the native-born population and this was examined in an Irish Early Intervention for Psychosis service. Methods: All cases of treated FEP from three local mental health services within a defined catchment area were included. Psychotic disorder diagnoses were determined using the SCID and symptom and functioning domains were measured using validated and reliable measures. Results: From a cohort of 612 people, 21.1% were first-generation migrants and there was no difference in the demographic characteristics, diagnoses, symptoms or functioning between migrants and those born in the Republic of Ireland, except that migrants from Africa presented with less insight. Of those admitted, 48.6% of admissions for migrants were involuntary compared to 37.7% for the native-born population (p = 0.09). Conclusions: First-generation migrants now make up a significant proportion of people presenting with a FEP to an Irish EI for psychosis service. Broadly the demographic and clinical characteristics of migrants and those born in the Republic of Ireland are similar, except for less insight in migrants from Africa and a trend for a higher proportion of involuntary admissions in the total migrant group.

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Brian O'Donoghue ◽  
Linglee Downey ◽  
Scott Eaton ◽  
Nathan Mifsud ◽  
James B. Kirkbride ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Certain migrant groups are at an increased risk of psychotic disorders compared to the native-born population; however, research to date has mainly been conducted in Europe. Less is known about whether migrants to other countries, with different histories and patterns of migration, such as Australia, are at an increased risk for developing a psychotic disorder. We tested this for first-generation migrants in Melbourne, Victoria. Methods This study included all young people aged 15–24 years, residing in a geographically-defined catchment area of north western Melbourne who presented with a first episode of psychosis (FEP) to the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre (EPPIC) between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2016. Data pertaining to the at-risk population were obtained from the Australian 2011 Census and incidence rate ratios were calculated and adjusted for age, sex and social deprivation. Results In total, 1220 young people presented with an FEP during the 6-year study period, of whom 24.5% were first-generation migrants. We found an increased risk for developing psychotic disorder in migrants from the following regions: Central and West Africa (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] = 3.53, 95% CI 1.58–7.92), Southern and Eastern Africa (aIRR = 3.06, 95% CI 1.99–4.70) and North Africa (aIRR = 5.03, 95% CI 3.26–7.76). Migrants from maritime South East Asia (aIRR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.23–0.65), China (aIRR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.13–0.48) and Southern Asia (aIRR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.26–0.76) had a decreased risk for developing a psychotic disorder. Conclusion This clear health inequality needs to be addressed by sufficient funding and accessible mental health services for more vulnerable groups. Further research is needed to determine why migrants have an increased risk for developing psychotic disorders.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Ilaria Tarricone ◽  
Giuseppe D'Andrea ◽  
Hannah E. Jongsma ◽  
Sarah Tosato ◽  
Charlotte Gayer-Anderson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Psychosis rates are higher among some migrant groups. We hypothesized that psychosis in migrants is associated with cumulative social disadvantage during different phases of migration. Methods We used data from the EUropean Network of National Schizophrenia Networks studying Gene-Environment Interactions (EU-GEI) case–control study. We defined a set of three indicators of social disadvantage for each phase: pre-migration, migration and post-migration. We examined whether social disadvantage in the pre- and post-migration phases, migration adversities, and mismatch between achievements and expectations differed between first-generation migrants with first-episode psychosis and healthy first-generation migrants, and tested whether this accounted for differences in odds of psychosis in multivariable logistic regression models. Results In total, 249 cases and 219 controls were assessed. Pre-migration (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.06–2.44, p = 0.027) and post-migration social disadvantages (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.02–3.51, p = 0.044), along with expectations/achievements mismatch (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03–1.26, p = 0.014) were all significantly associated with psychosis. Migration adversities (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.672–2.06, p = 0.568) were not significantly related to the outcome. Finally, we found a dose–response effect between the number of adversities across all phases and odds of psychosis (⩾6: OR 14.09, 95% CI 2.06–96.47, p = 0.007). Conclusions The cumulative effect of social disadvantages before, during and after migration was associated with increased odds of psychosis in migrants, independently of ethnicity or length of stay in the country of arrival. Public health initiatives that address the social disadvantages that many migrants face during the whole migration process and post-migration psychological support may reduce the excess of psychosis in migrants.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristie Chu ◽  
Liang Zhu ◽  
Christy T Ankrom ◽  
Alyssa Trevino ◽  
Michele Joseph ◽  
...  

Introduction: Telestroke (TS) expands access to acute stroke care and facilitates swift transfer of patients to tertiary stroke centers. However, patients transferred from spoke hospitals who expire shortly after arrival raises the question of whether there is opportunity to predict futility of transfer to a higher level of care. We examined acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients transferred to our hub from TS spoke hospitals and identified who expired or went on to hospice within 48 hours of arrival. Methods: In our TS network, we identified AIS patients who were transferred from spoke hospitals following TS consultation (9/2015 - 12/2018). We compared demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who expired or went on to hospice within the first 48 hours versus those who did not. Hospice decision time was determined by chart review for documentation of goals of care discussions. Results: Of 530 transfers to the hub, there were 32 (6%) patients who expired or went on to hospice within 48 hours. Compared to those who did not, these patients had increased age (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.05-1.12), higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.02-4.90) or cancer (OR 3.04; 95% CI 1.17-7.87), higher pre-morbid mRS (OR 5.14; 95% CI 1.57-16.88), and higher NIHSS (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.16-1.31). Interestingly, the same characteristics were also significantly different in those who expired or went on to hospice beyond 48 hours. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics of sex and race/ethnicity. There was also no significant difference in the frequency of treatment with tPA or IAT; of the 32 patients who expired or went on to hospice within 48 hours, 21 (66%) had received tPA and 3 (9%) had undergone IAT. Palliative care was consulted for 31 (97%) of those patients. Conclusions: A relatively small but significant proportion of TS transfers to our hub expired or went on to hospice within 48 hours. These patients were characterized by increased age, poorer pre-stroke functional status and high stroke severity. In light of the current strain on resources with the pandemic, telepalliative services may help to better serve certain patients, in particular those who are elderly or debilitated, at spoke hospitals without the need for transfer to hub.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Brian O'Donoghue ◽  
John Lyne ◽  
Eric Roche ◽  
Nathan Mifsud ◽  
Laoise Renwick ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Migration is an established risk factor for developing a psychotic disorder in countries with a long history of migration. Less is known for countries with only a recent history of migration. This study aimed to determine the risk for developing a psychotic disorder in migrants to the Republic of Ireland. Methods We included all presentations of first-episode psychosis over 8.5 years to the DETECT Early Intervention for psychosis service in the Republic of Ireland (573 individuals aged 18–65, of whom 22% were first-generation migrants). Psychotic disorder diagnosis relied on SCID. The at-risk population was calculated using census data, and negative binomial regression was used to estimate incidence rate ratios. Results The annual crude incidence rate for a first-episode psychotic disorder in the total cohort was 25.62 per 100000 population at risk. Migrants from Africa had a nearly twofold increased risk for developing a psychotic disorder compared to those born in the Republic of Ireland (IRR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.11–3.02, p = 0.02). In contrast, migrants from certain Asian countries had a reduced risk, specifically those from China, India, Philippines, Pakistan, Malaysia, Bangladesh and Hong Kong (aIRR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.16–0.81, p = 0.01). Conclusions Further research into the reasons for this inflated risk in specific migrant groups could produce insights into the aetiology of psychotic disorders. This information should also be used, alongside other data on environmental risk factors that can be determined from census data, to predict the incidence of psychotic disorders and thereby resource services appropriately.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-118
Author(s):  
Anita Pugliese ◽  
Julie Ray ◽  
Neli Esipova

This paper reports the results from Gallup’s global analysis of the likelihood of first-generation migrants, second-generation migrants and the native-born to send financial help in the form of money or goods to others inside or outside their respective country of residence. The findings in this paper are based on more than 450,000 interviews conducted through Gallup’s World Poll in 157 countries in 2012, 2013 and 2014. The sample includes more than 26,000 first-generation migrants and more than 20,000 second-generation migrants. The large sample enables Gallup to analyze first-generation migrants by the duration of their stay in their adopted country and compare their remittance behaviors with second-generation migrants and the native-born.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document