Abstract P282: Which Telestroke Transfers to the Hub Expire or Receive Hospice Within 48 Hours of Arrival?

Introduction: Telestroke (TS) expands access to acute stroke care and facilitates swift transfer of patients to tertiary stroke centers. However, patients transferred from spoke hospitals who expire shortly after arrival raises the question of whether there is opportunity to predict futility of transfer to a higher level of care. We examined acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients transferred to our hub from TS spoke hospitals and identified who expired or went on to hospice within 48 hours of arrival. Methods: In our TS network, we identified AIS patients who were transferred from spoke hospitals following TS consultation (9/2015 - 12/2018). We compared demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who expired or went on to hospice within the first 48 hours versus those who did not. Hospice decision time was determined by chart review for documentation of goals of care discussions. Results: Of 530 transfers to the hub, there were 32 (6%) patients who expired or went on to hospice within 48 hours. Compared to those who did not, these patients had increased age (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.05-1.12), higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.02-4.90) or cancer (OR 3.04; 95% CI 1.17-7.87), higher pre-morbid mRS (OR 5.14; 95% CI 1.57-16.88), and higher NIHSS (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.16-1.31). Interestingly, the same characteristics were also significantly different in those who expired or went on to hospice beyond 48 hours. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics of sex and race/ethnicity. There was also no significant difference in the frequency of treatment with tPA or IAT; of the 32 patients who expired or went on to hospice within 48 hours, 21 (66%) had received tPA and 3 (9%) had undergone IAT. Palliative care was consulted for 31 (97%) of those patients. Conclusions: A relatively small but significant proportion of TS transfers to our hub expired or went on to hospice within 48 hours. These patients were characterized by increased age, poorer pre-stroke functional status and high stroke severity. In light of the current strain on resources with the pandemic, telepalliative services may help to better serve certain patients, in particular those who are elderly or debilitated, at spoke hospitals without the need for transfer to hub.

Download Full-text

Abstract P93: The Effects of Covid-19 on Telestroke Care Delivery

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p93 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Johanna L Morton ◽

Suraj Didwania ◽

Eric Anderson ◽

Jason Hallock

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Care Delivery ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Study Data ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Presentation Time ◽

Stroke Group ◽

The U.S

Background: Telestroke is increasingly being utilized to deliver acute stroke care to patients without in-person access to stroke expertise. After the U.S. emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic in March of 2020, reports of its effects on acute stroke care surfaced. This review examines the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on telestroke care delivery in a large telestroke network, spanning 36 states and 340 hospitals throughout the nation. Methods: For this retrospective observational study, data was reported from the internal medical record platform from three separate time periods - a year before the pandemic (March 2019 - May 2019), the three months immediately prior to the pandemic (December 2019 - February 2020), and the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. (March 2020 - May 2020). Two groups were studied, those seen in the emergency department (ED) with a suspected stroke diagnosis, and those who received alteplase in the ED. Results: The analysis revealed a decrease in patient volumes in both groups during the pandemic. The presentation time did not significantly vary between any of the stroke or alteplase groups. There was no significant difference in door-to-consult request times in the pandemic vs prior to the pandemic. The door-to-video time was shorter in the pandemic in alteplase patients compared to immediately prior ( P =0.04), but not compared to 2019 ( P =0.35). There was no significant difference in door-to-decision times or door-to-needle times in all of the groups. There was no difference in stroke severity in the alteplase group during the pandemic, but in the stroke group, stroke severity was higher during the pandemic ( P <0.01). Rates of thrombolysis did not decrease during the pandemic. Conclusion: COVID-19 has strained the U.S. emergency medical system and created unique challenges to treating patients with acute ischemic stroke. Likely due to the size and heterogeneity of the patient population, minimal adverse effects on telestroke process metrics were seen in this particular large teleneurology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review highlights the resilience of our nation’s stroke system of care to withstand the stressor of a worldwide pandemic.

Download Full-text

Bottlenecks in the Acute Stroke Care System during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Catalonia

Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1159/000516309 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Anna Ramos-Pachón ◽

Álvaro García-Tornel ◽

Mònica Millán ◽

Marc Ribó ◽

Sergi Amaro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Quality ◽

Point Of View ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Prehospital Delays ◽

The Impact

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant healthcare reorganizations, potentially striking standard medical care. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care quality and clinical outcomes to detect healthcare system’s bottlenecks from a territorial point of view. Methods: Crossed-data analysis between a prospective nation-based mandatory registry of acute stroke, Emergency Medical System (EMS) records, and daily incidence of COVID-19 in Catalonia (Spain). We included all stroke code activations during the pandemic (March 15–May 2, 2020) and an immediate prepandemic period (January 26–March 14, 2020). Primary outcomes were stroke code activations and reperfusion therapies in both periods. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics, workflow metrics, differences across types of stroke centers, correlation analysis between weekly EMS alerts, COVID-19 cases, and workflow metrics, and impact on mortality and clinical outcome at 90 days. Results: Stroke code activations decreased by 22% and reperfusion therapies dropped by 29% during the pandemic period, with no differences in age, stroke severity, or large vessel occlusion. Calls to EMS were handled 42 min later, and time from onset to hospital arrival increased by 53 min, with significant correlations between weekly COVID-19 cases and more EMS calls (rho = 0.81), less stroke code activations (rho = −0.37), and longer prehospital delays (rho = 0.25). Telestroke centers were afflicted with higher reductions in stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, referrals to endovascular centers, and increased delays to thrombolytics. The independent odds of death increased (OR 1.6 [1.05–2.4], p 0.03) and good functional outcome decreased (mRS ≤2 at 90 days: OR 0.6 [0.4–0.9], p 0.015) during the pandemic period. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Catalonia’s stroke system’s weakest points were the delay to EMS alert and a decline of stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, and interhospital transfers, mostly at local centers. Patients suffering an acute stroke during the pandemic period had higher odds of poor functional outcome and death. The complete stroke care system’s analysis is crucial to allocate resources appropriately.

Download Full-text

Abstract P141: Global Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Acute Stroke and Mechanical Thrombectomy - An International Survey

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p141 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Dileep R Yavagal ◽

Vasu Saini ◽

Violiza Inoa ◽

Hannah E Gardener ◽

Sheila O Martins ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

High Volume ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Treatment Practices ◽

Global Impact ◽

Significant Difference ◽

The World ◽

The Impact

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has strained the healthcare systems across the world but its impact on acute stroke care is just being elucidated. We hypothesized a major global impact of COVID-19 not only on stroke volumes but also on thrombectomy practice. Methods: A 19-item questionnaire survey aimed to identify the changes in stroke volumes and treatment practices seen during COVID-19 pandemic was designed using Qualtrics software. It was sent to stroke and neuro-interventional physicians around the world who are part of the executive committee of a global coalition, Mission Thrombectomy 2020 (MT2020) between April 5 th to May 15 th , 2020. Results: There were 113 responses across 25 countries. Globally there was a median 33% decrease in stroke admissions and a 25% decrease in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) procedures during COVID-19 pandemic compared to immediately preceding months (Figure 1A-B). This overall median decrease was despite a median increase in stroke volume in 4 European countries which diverted all stroke patients to only a few selected centers during the pandemic. The intubation policy during the pandemic for patients undergoing MT was highly variable across participating centers: 44% preferred intubating all patients, including 25% centers that changed their policy to preferred-intubation (PI) vs 27% centers that switched to preferred-conscious-sedation (PCS). There was no significant difference in rate of COVID-19 infection between PI vs PCS (p=0.6) or if intubation policy was changed in either direction (p=1). Low-volume (<10 stroke/month) compared with high-volume stroke centers (>20 strokes/month) are less likely to have neurointerventional suite specific written personal protective equipment protocols (74% vs 88%) and if present, these centers are more likely to report them to be inadequate (58% vs 92%). Conclusion: Our data provides a comprehensive snapshot of the impact on acute stroke care observed worldwide during the pandemic.

Download Full-text

Abstract 21: Are Stroke Outcomes Influenced by New Starting Residents? The July Effect: Myth or Reality?

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.21 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Tai Hwan Park ◽

Jitphapa Pongmoragot ◽

Shudong Li ◽

Gustavo Saposnik ◽

Keyword(s):

Functional Outcome ◽

Performance Measures ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Teaching Hospitals ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Stroke Outcomes ◽

July Effect ◽

Negative Effect ◽

To Receive

Background: Acute stroke care provided by comprehensive stroke centers usually follows prespecified protocols. However, there are concerns about lower quality of care and poorer stroke outcomes early after new trainnees (e.g.) residents start in July in academic/teaching hospitals. This has been called ‘the July effect’. Objective: To evaluate access to specialized care and outcomes among patients admitted with an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in July and other months. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that there were no significant differences in access to stroke care and outcomes for patients admitted in July when new trainees start at academic centers. Methods: Patients presenting with an AIS at 11 stroke centers in Ontario, Canada, between 2003 and 2009 were identified from the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. We compared performance measures and functional outcomes (death at 30 days, modified Rankin Scale 3 to 5 at discharge) between AIS patients admitted in July of each studied year and those who admitted during other months. Results: Of 10,319 eligible patients with an AIS, 882 (8.5%) were admitted in July. There was not difference in age, sex, or baseline stroke severity between patients admitted in July or other months. Among the performance measures analyzed, AIS admitted in July were less likely to receive thrombolysis (12.1% vs. 16.0%, p=0.002), swallowing test (64.4% vs. 67.9%, p=0.033), and admission to stroke unit (61.9% vs. 67.6%, <0.001). There was no difference in death at 30-days (16.4% vs. 16.1%, p=0.823) or poor functional outcome (61.0% vs. 63.5%, p=0.14) between two groups (Table). Conclusion: AIS patients admitted in July were less likely to receive thrombolysis and be admitted to stroke units compared to patients admitted on the rest of the year. However, there was no negative effect of “admission on July” on functional outcome or death.

Download Full-text

Abstract P855: Importance of Compliance in Dysphagia Screening in Acute Stroke Care

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p855 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Patty Noah ◽

Melanie Henderson ◽

Rebekah Heintz ◽

Russell Cerejo ◽

Christopher T Hackett ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Aspiration Pneumonia ◽

Hemorrhagic Stroke ◽

Oral Intake ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Chi Square ◽

Stroke Center

Introduction: Dysphagia occurs in up to two thirds of stroke patients and can lead to serious complications such as aspiration pneumonia, which is also linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Evidence-based guidelines recommend a bedside dysphagia assessment before oral intake in stroke patients regardless of initial stroke severity. Several studies have described registered nurses’ competency in terms of knowledge and skills regarding dysphagia screening. We aimed to examine the rate of aspiration pneumonia compared to the rate of dysphagia screening. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data at a single tertiary stroke center was carried out between January 2017 and June 2020. Data comparison was completed utilizing ICD-10 diagnosis codes to identify aspiration pneumonia in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients. The data was reviewed to compare the compliance of a completed dysphagia screen prior to any oral intake to rate of aspiration pneumonia. Chi square tests were used to assess proportion differences in completed dysphagia screen and proportion of aspiration pneumonia diagnosis in the ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients. Results: We identified 3320 patient that met inclusion criteria. 67% were ischemic strokes, 22% were intracerebral hemorrhages and 11% were subarachnoid hemorrhages. Compliance with dysphagia screening decreased from 94.2% (n=1555/1650) in 2017-2018 to 74.0% (n=1236/1670) in 2019-2020, OR=0.17 (95%CI 0.14 - 0.22), p < 0.0001. Aspiration pneumonias increased from 58 (3.5%) in 2017-2018 to 77 (4.6%) in 2019-2020, but this difference was not statistically significant, OR=0.75 (95%CI 0.53 - 1.07), p = 0.11. Conclusion: We noted that the decrease in compliance with completing a dysphagia screen in patients with acute stroke prior to any oral intake was associated with a higher trend of aspiration pneumonia.

Download Full-text

Abstract 352: Early Data From an Implementation Science Study Suggests the Need for Identification and Adoption of Best Practices to Improve the Timeliness of Stroke Treatment

Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes ◽

10.1161/hcq.13.suppl_1.352 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Lisa M Monk

Keyword(s):

Best Practices ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Care Delivery ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Early Data ◽

Screening Tools ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Ct Scanner ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Stroke Treatment

There is a disconnect from discovery of best treatment options and application into clinical practice in a timely manner. The I M plementation of best Pr actices f O r acute stroke care-de v eloping and optimizing regional systems of Stroke Care (IMPROVE Stroke Care) goal is to develop a regional integrated stroke system that identifies, classifies, and treats patients with acute ischemic stroke more rapidly and effectively with reperfusion therapy. These improvements in acute stroke care delivery are expected to result in lower mortality, fewer recurrent strokes, and improved long term functional outcomes. Recent discoveries in stroke care and advancement in technology extends the window for both TPA administration and mechanical thombectomy. The challenge of implementing these latest advances are difficult considering the ability of hospitals to implement the original American Heart Association (AHA) Systems of Stroke Care recommendations. Early data from this project shows that the challenges continue to exist in recommendations that have been in place as early as 2005. EMS is not utilizing pre-hospital stroke screening tools, only 5% of the time, stroke severity tools, only 7% of the time, lytic checklists, 0% of the time, destination decision changed due to severity score, 0% of the time, and pre-notifying emergency rooms, only 63% of the time. Emergency departments door to CT <45 minutes, only 55% of the time, Lytic given in CT scanner, only 35% of the time, Door to lytic therapy< 45 minutes, 77% of the time, Door to Groin puncture, 81% of the time, and Door to TICI Flow 2c/3 flow <90 minutes, 39% of the time. The Systems of Stroke Care have recommendations that will improve time to treatment and outcomes for patients. This project is working to provide tools, guidance, data, and feedback to improve application of these recommendations and identify best practices and solutions to barriers.

Download Full-text

Critical factors determining access to acute stroke care

Neurology ◽

10.1212/wnl.51.2.427 ◽

1998 ◽

Vol 51 (2) ◽

pp. 427-432 ◽

Cited By ~ 116

Author(s):

Sindhu C. Menon ◽

Dilip K. Pandey ◽

Lewis B. Morgenstern

Keyword(s):

Access To Care ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Symptom Onset ◽

Multivariate Regression ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Physician ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Hospital Arrival ◽

Ambulance Transport

Objective: Our objective was to assess gender, ethnic, and access-to-care factors critical in delay time (DT) for presentation to the hospital for acute stroke.Background: Little information is available on the effect of gender, ethnicity, and access issues on DT.Design: Demographic, access-to-care, and DT information was obtained from emergency department (ED) documentation of stroke patients admitted from July 1995 through June 1997 at Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.Results: Of the 241 eligible patients, 126 were African American (AA), 82 were non-Hispanic white (NHW), and 33 were Hispanic American (HA). Median DT from symptom onset to presentation to the ED was 222 minutes for AAs, 280 minutes for HAs, and 230 minutes for NHWs. A multivariate regression model estimated DT to ED arrival decreased with ambulance transport (p= 0.003) and increased in patients with a primary care physician(p = 0.145) and in women (p = 0.052). DT to see an ED physician after hospital arrival decreased with ambulance transport (p < 0.001), hemorrhage patients (p = 0.006), and worse stroke severity (p = 0.038), and increased in women (p = 0.041). DT to see a neurologist decreased with hemorrhage (p = 0.002) and ambulance arrival (p = 0.010). Neurologists saw patients within 3 hours of symptom onset in 34% of NHWs, 28% of AAs, and 18% of HAs.Conclusion: Gender and access-to-care issues may be important determinants of delay in acute stroke care. Less than 20% of HAs presented to the ED within 3 hours of symptom onset.

Download Full-text

Discrimination experienced by landed immigrants in Canada

10.32920/ryerson.14639880.v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Parveen Parveen

Keyword(s):

Regression Analysis ◽

Household Income ◽

Older Persons ◽

General Social Survey ◽

Demographic Characteristics ◽

Social Survey ◽

Visible Minorities ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Language Region ◽

Race Ethnicity

Immigrants land in Canada with great hopes and multiple dreams, but the General Social Survey 2009 shows that one-fifth of them face discrimination in various situations once they have arrived. Ethnicity, race, language, and religion are the major grounds of discrimination. In this paper, the experiences of discrimination of landed immigrants are compared with those of non-immigrants. A logistic regression analysis is used on GSS data to predict the probability of facing discrimination based on the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of a person. Separate models are prepared for landed immigrants and non-immigrants. Results show that immigrants are much more likely to face discrimination than non-immigrants. Visible minorities and younger persons face higher levels of discrimination compared to non-visible minorities and older persons. Irrespective of their gender, household income, language, region of domicile, and number of evening activities, landed immigrants have similar chances of facing discrimination; whereas, for non-immigrants, these characteristics make a significant difference in their experiences of discrimination. Key Words: Discrimination, immigrant, race, ethnicity, and human rights.

Download Full-text

Discrimination experienced by landed immigrants in Canada

10.32920/ryerson.14639880 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Parveen Parveen

Keyword(s):

Regression Analysis ◽

Household Income ◽

Older Persons ◽

General Social Survey ◽

Demographic Characteristics ◽

Social Survey ◽

Visible Minorities ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Language Region ◽

Race Ethnicity

Download Full-text

Abstract MP22: Sex Differences in the Delivery of Acute Telestroke Care

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.mp22 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Johanna L Morton ◽

Suraj Didwania ◽

Eric Anderson ◽

Jason Hallock

Keyword(s):

Sex Differences ◽

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Patient Population ◽

Functional Outcomes ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Presenting Symptoms ◽

Suspected Stroke

Background: Sex differences are encountered in many aspects of ischemic stroke, including risk factors, presenting symptoms, stroke mechanism, acute interventions and functional outcomes. As telestroke services continue to expand, many patients utilize telestroke for the evaluation and treatment of suspected stroke symptoms. To date, the existence of such differences between sexes has not been identified in the patient population having utilized telestroke for acute stroke care. Methods: A retrospective observational study of the experience of a single teleneurology practice serving 340 hospitals from April 2018 to June 2020 was performed. Patients seen in the emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of suspected stroke were included. Data from the acute stroke encounter was reported through the current medical record platform. Results: Within the queried period, there were 11,454 male and 11,794 female patients identified as having received ED telestroke evaluation for suspected acute stroke. Males were younger than females (67 vs 70, P <0.01). Males had higher rates of prior stroke, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and coronary disease than females ( P <0.01), while females had higher rates of atrial fibrillation ( P =0.03) and TIA ( P <0.01). Rates of antiplatelet and anticoagulants were higher in males ( P <0.01) than females. There were no differences in time to ED presentation, time to request consult or make a thrombolysis decision, or length of consult. Females had higher stroke severity ( P <0.01) and door-to-needle times ( P <0.01), but lower alteplase rates ( P =0.02) compared to males. Conclusion: This review of a national heterogeneous telestroke patient population is indicative of sex differences in multiple aspects of acute ischemic stroke, most notably in thrombolysis delivered via telestroke. Further investigation into the etiology of such differences is warranted, as well as a survey of functional outcomes. As telemedicine continues to expand in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is imperative that the reasons behind this disparity are investigated.

Download Full-text