THE SOLIDITY AND NONSOLIDITY OF INITIAL SEGMENTS OF THE CORE MODEL

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 920-938
Author(s):  
GUNTER FUCHS ◽  
RALF SCHINDLER
Keyword(s):  
Core Model ◽  
Solid Core ◽  
The Core ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Cohen Real ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

AbstractIt is shown that $K|{\omega _1}$ need not be solid in the sense previously introduced by the authors: it is consistent that there is no inner model with a Woodin cardinal yet there is an inner model W and a Cohen real x over W such that $K|{\omega _1}\,\, \in \,\,W[x] \setminus W$. However, if ${0^{\rm{\P}}}$ does not exist and $\kappa \ge {\omega _2}$ is a cardinal, then $K|\kappa$ is solid. We draw the conclusion that solidity is not forcing absolute in general, and that under the assumption of $\neg {0^{\rm{\P}}}$, the core model is contained in the solid core, previously introduced by the authors.It is also shown, assuming ${0^{\rm{\P}}}$ does not exist, that if there is a forcing that preserves ${\omega _1}$, forces that every real has a sharp, and increases $\delta _2^1$, then ${\omega _1}$ is measurable in K.

A finite family weak square principle

1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 1087-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest Schimmerling
Keyword(s):  
Finite Family ◽  
Core Model ◽  
Proved Theorem ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Square Principles ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Woodin Cardinal ◽  
Global Principle ◽  
Small Building ◽  
Weak Square

Definition 1.1. Suppose that λ ≤ κ are cardinals and Γ is a subset of (κ, κ+). By , we mean the principle asserting that there is a sequence 〈Fν | ν ∈ lim(Γ)〉 such that for every ν ∈ lim(Γ), the following hold.(1) 1 ≤ card(Fν) < λ.(2) The following hold for every C ∈ Fν.(a) C ⊆ ν ∩ Γ,(b) C is club in ν,(c) o.t.(C) ≤ κ,By we mean . If Γ = (κ, κ+), then we write for and for .These weak square principles were introduced in [Sch2, 5.1]. They generalize Jensen's principles □κ and , which are equivalent to and respectively. Jensen's global □ principle implies □κ for all κ.Theorem 1.2. Suppose that is a core model. Assume that every countable premouse M which elementarily embeds into a level of is (ω1 + 1)-iterable. Then, for every κ, holds in .The minimal non-1-small mouse is essentially a sharp for an inner model with a Woodin cardinal. We originally proved Theorem 1.2 under the assumption that is 1-small, building on [MiSt] and [Sch2]. Some generalizations followed by combining our methods with those of [St2] and [SchSt2]. (For example, the tame countably certified core model Kc satisfies .) In order to eliminate the smallness assumption all together, one replaces our use of the Dodd-Jensen lemma in proofs of condensation properties for with the weak Dodd-Jensen lemma of [NSt].

scholarly journals Jónsson cardinals, Erdős cardinals, and the core model

1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 1065-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. J. Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Minimal Model ◽  
Independent Interest ◽  
Core Model ◽  
Generic Extension ◽  
The Core ◽  
Steel Core ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Jonsson Cardinals ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

AbstractWe show that if there is no inner model with a Woodin cardinal and the Steel core model K exists, then every Jónsson cardinal is Ramsey in K, and every δ-Jónsson cardinal is δ5-Erdős in K.In the absence of the Steel core model K we prove the same conclusion for any model L[] such that either V = L[] is the minimal model for a Woodin cardinal, or there is no inner model with a Woodin cardinal and V is a generic extension of L[].The proof includes one lemma of independent interest: If V = L[A], where A ⊂ κ and κ is regular, then Lκ[A] is a Jónsson algebra. The proof of this result. Lemma 2.5, is very short and entirely elementary.

Successive weakly compact or singular cardinals

1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf-Dieter Schindler
Keyword(s):  
Core Model ◽  
Weakly Compact ◽  
The Core ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Singular Cardinals ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

AbstractIt is shown in ZF that if δ < δ+ < Ω are such that δ and δ+ are either both weakly compact or singular cardinals and Ω is large enough for putting the core model apparatus into action then there is an inner model with a Woodin cardinal.

VARSOVIAN MODELS I

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 496-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
GRIGOR SARGSYAN ◽  
RALF SCHINDLER
Keyword(s):  
Core Model ◽  
Generic Extension ◽  
Strong Cardinal ◽  
Small Core ◽  
Woodin Cardinals ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Specific Fragment ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

AbstractLet Msw denote the least iterable inner model with a strong cardinal above a Woodin cardinal. By [11], Msw has a fully iterable core model, ${K^{{M_{{\rm{sw}}}}}}$, and Msw is thus the least iterable extender model which has an iterable core model with a Woodin cardinal. In V, ${K^{{M_{{\rm{sw}}}}}}$ is an iterate of Msw via its iteration strategy Σ.We here show that Msw has a bedrock which arises from ${K^{{M_{{\rm{sw}}}}}}$ by telling ${K^{{M_{{\rm{sw}}}}}}$ a specific fragment ${\rm{\bar{\Sigma }}}$ of its own iteration strategy, which in turn is a tail of Σ. Hence Msw is a generic extension of $L[{K^{{M_{{\rm{sw}}}}}},{\rm{\bar{\Sigma }}}]$, but the latter model is not a generic extension of any inner model properly contained in it.These results generalize to models of the form Ms (x) for a cone of reals x, where Ms (x) denotes the least iterable inner model with a strong cardinal containing x. In particular, the least iterable inner model with a strong cardinal above two (or seven, or boundedly many) Woodin cardinals has a 2-small core model K with a Woodin cardinal and its bedrock is again of the form $L[K,{\rm{\bar{\Sigma }}}]$.

scholarly journals THE CONSISTENCY STRENGTH OF LONG PROJECTIVE DETERMINACY

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 338-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
JUAN P. AGUILERA ◽  
SANDRA MÜLLER
Keyword(s):  
Set Theory ◽  
Consistency Strength ◽  
Axiom Of Determinacy ◽  
Woodin Cardinals ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

AbstractWe determine the consistency strength of determinacy for projective games of length ω2. Our main theorem is that $\Pi _{n + 1}^1 $-determinacy for games of length ω2 implies the existence of a model of set theory with ω + n Woodin cardinals. In a first step, we show that this hypothesis implies that there is a countable set of reals A such that Mn (A), the canonical inner model for n Woodin cardinals constructed over A, satisfies $$A = R$$ and the Axiom of Determinacy. Then we argue how to obtain a model with ω + n Woodin cardinal from this.We also show how the proof can be adapted to investigate the consistency strength of determinacy for games of length ω2 with payoff in $^R R\Pi _1^1 $ or with σ-projective payoff.

INNER MODEL THEORETIC GEOLOGY

2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 972-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
GUNTER FUCHS ◽  
RALF SCHINDLER
Keyword(s):  
Set Theory ◽  
Main Theme ◽  
Solid Core ◽  
Strong Cardinal ◽  
The Third ◽  
Inner Models ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Basic Concepts ◽  
Woodin Cardinal ◽  
The Universe

AbstractOne of the basic concepts of set theoretic geology is the mantle of a model of set theory V: it is the intersection of all grounds of V, that is, of all inner models M of V such that V is a set-forcing extension of M. The main theme of the present paper is to identify situations in which the mantle turns out to be a fine structural extender model. The first main result is that this is the case when the universe is constructible from a set and there is an inner model with a Woodin cardinal. The second situation like that arises if L[E] is an extender model that is iterable in V but not internally iterable, as guided by P-constructions, L[E] has no strong cardinal, and the extender sequence E is ordinal definable in L[E] and its forcing extensions by collapsing a cutpoint to ω (in an appropriate sense). The third main result concerns the Solid Core of a model of set theory. This is the union of all sets that are constructible from a set of ordinals that cannot be added by set-forcing to an inner model. The main result here is that if there is an inner model with a Woodin cardinal, then the solid core is a fine-structural extender model.

scholarly journals IDEAL PROJECTIONS AND FORCING PROJECTIONS

2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 1247-1285 ◽  
Author(s):  
SEAN COX ◽  
MARTIN ZEMAN
Keyword(s):  
Set Theory ◽  
Negative Answer ◽  
Large Cardinals ◽  
Normal Ideal ◽  
List Type ◽  
Type Number ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Open Question ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

AbstractIt is well known that saturation of ideals is closely related to the “antichain-catching” phenomenon from Foreman–Magidor–Shelah [10]. We consider several antichain-catching properties that are weaker than saturation, and prove:(1)If${\cal I}$is a normal ideal on$\omega _2 $which satisfiesstationary antichain catching, then there is an inner model with a Woodin cardinal;(2)For any$n \in \omega $, it is consistent relative to large cardinals that there is a normal ideal${\cal I}$on$\omega _n $which satisfiesprojective antichain catching, yet${\cal I}$is not saturated (or even strong). This provides a negative answer to Open Question number 13 from Foreman’s chapter in the Handbook of Set Theory ([7]).

KWithout the Measurable

2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 708-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Jensen ◽  
John Steel
Keyword(s):  
Core Model ◽  
Proper Class ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

AbstractWe show in ZFC that if there is no proper class inner model with a Woodin cardinal, then there is an absolutely definablecore modelthat is close toVin various ways.

scholarly journals DOWNWARD TRANSFERENCE OF MICE AND UNIVERSALITY OF LOCAL CORE MODELS

2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-419
Author(s):  
ANDRÉS EDUARDO CAICEDO ◽  
MARTIN ZEMAN
Keyword(s):  
Proper Class ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

AbstractIf M is a proper class inner model of ZFC and $\omega _2^{\bf{M}} = \omega _2 $, then every sound mouse projecting to ω and not past 0¶ belongs to M. In fact, under the assumption that 0¶ does not belong to M, ${\bf{K}}^{\bf{M}} \parallel \omega _2 $ is universal for all countable mice in V.Similarly, if M is a proper class inner model of ZFC, δ > ω1 is regular, (δ+)M = δ+ and in V there is no proper class inner model with a Woodin cardinal, then ${\bf{K}}^{\bf{M}} \parallel \delta $ is universal for all mice in V of cardinality less than δ.

scholarly journals Diagonal Prikry extensions

2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 1383-1402 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Cummings ◽  
Matthew Foreman
Keyword(s):  
Model Theory ◽  
Measurable Cardinal ◽  
Core Model ◽  
Singular Cardinal ◽  
Inner Model Theory ◽  
Regular Cardinals ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Singular Cardinals ◽  
Free Abelian Groups ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

§1. Introduction. It is a well-known phenomenon in set theory that problems in infinite combinatorics involving singular cardinals and their successors tend to be harder than the parallel problems for regular cardinals. Examples include the behaviour of cardinal exponentiation, the extent of the tree property, the extent of stationary reflection, and the existence of non-free almost-free abelian groups. The explanation for this phenomenon lies in inner model theory, in particular core models and covering lemmas. If W is an inner model of V then1. W strongly covers V if every uncountable set of ordinals is covered by a set of the same V -cardinality lying in W.2. W weakly covers V if W computes the successor of every V-singular cardinal correctly.Strong covering implies weak covering.In inner model theory there are many theorems of the general form “if there is no inner model of large cardinal hypothesis X then there is an L-like inner model Kx which Y covers V”. Here the L-like properties of Kx always include GCH and Global Square. Examples include1. X is “0# exists”, Kx is L, Y is “strongly”.2. X is “there is a measurable cardinal”, Kx is the Dodd-Jensen core model, Y is “strongly”.3. X is “there is a Woodin cardinal”, Kx is the core model for a Woodin cardinal, Y is “weakly”.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document