scholarly journals PROPOSING A SPECIFICATION STRUCTURE FOR COMPLEX PRODUCTS IN MODEL-BASED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (MBSE)

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 2481-2490
Author(s):  
Joshua Fahl ◽  
Tobias Hirschter ◽  
Gabriel Wöhrle ◽  
Albert Albers
Keyword(s):  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Student Development ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Product Complexity ◽  
Complex Product ◽  
Complex Products ◽  
Model Based Systems Engineering ◽  
Product Specification

AbstractThis research work presents a methodological support for the specification of complex products. This is achieved by developing a specification structure in a MBSE environment. The new method draws on success factors of complex product specification, principles of MBSE and the explanatory model of PGE – Product Generation Engineering. For evaluation, the method is applied within a student development project. A high applicability and the realization of novel synergies for coping with continuously increasing product complexity is demonstrated.

scholarly journals EVALUATING MBSE POTENTIAL USING PRODUCT AND DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS – A STATISTICAL INVESTIGATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 2385-2394
Author(s):  
M. Schöberl ◽  
E. Rebentisch ◽  
J. Trauer ◽  
M. Mörtl ◽  
J. Fottner
Keyword(s):  
Principal Component Analysis ◽  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Component Analysis ◽  
Statistical Investigation ◽  
Product Complexity ◽  
Organizational Complexity ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Model Based Systems Engineering

AbstractAs model-based systems engineering (MBSE) is evolving, the need for evaluating MBSE approaches grows. Literature shows that there is an untested assertion in the MBSE community that complexity drives the adoption of MBSE. To assess this assertion and support the evaluation of MBSE, a principal component analysis was carried out on eight product and development characteristics using data collected in an MBSE course, resulting in organizational complexity, product complexity and inertia. To conclude, the method developed in this paper enables organisations to evaluate their MBSE adoption potential.

Transient Root Cause Analysis: A Model-Based Systems Engineering Methodology

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor Bailey ◽  
Suzanne Woll ◽  
Rajul Misra ◽  
Kevin Otto
Keyword(s):  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
System Modeling ◽  
Root Cause Analysis ◽  
System Level ◽  
Cause Analysis ◽  
Root Cause ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Model Based Systems Engineering

This paper presents a model-based systems engineering methodology that can be applied to perform a root cause analysis on transient systems. The methodology extends existing root cause analysis best practice by incorporating system modeling and analysis techniques. The methodology is deployed through a detailed 5-step process to understand, identify, assess, FMEA, and validate potential transient system-level root causes. A transient performance reliability analysis for a dual mode refrigeration system is used to demonstrate how the methodology can be applied. The paper also describes a set of success factors for applying the methodology using a phased approach with a large cross-functional team.

scholarly journals Motivations for servitization: the impact of product complexity

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Raddats ◽  
Tim Baines ◽  
Jamie Burton ◽  
Vicky Mary Story ◽  
Judy Zolkiewski
Keyword(s):  
Product Differentiation ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Product Complexity ◽  
Complex Product ◽  
Complex Products ◽  
Business Transformation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose To identify the commonalities and differences in manufacturers’ motivations to servitize. Design/methodology/approach UK study based on interviews with 40 managers in 25 companies in 12 sectors. Using the concept of product complexity, sectors were grouped using the Complex Products and Systems (CoPS) typology: non-complex products, complex products, and systems. Findings Motivations to servitize were categorised as competitive, demand-based (i.e., derived from the customer) or economic. Motivations to servitize vary according to product complexity, although cost savings and improved service quality appear important demand-based motivations for all manufacturers. Non-complex product manufacturers also focus on services to help product differentiation. For CoPS manufacturers, both risk reduction and developing a new revenue stream were important motivations. For uniquely complex product manufacturers, stabilising revenue and increased profitability were strong motivations. For uniquely systems manufacturers, customers sought business transformation, whilst new service business models were also identified. Research limitations/implications Using the CoPS typology, this study delineates motivations to servitize by sector. The findings show varying motivations to servitize as product complexity increases, although some motivational commonality existed across all groups. Manufacturers may have products of differing complexity within their portfolio. To overcome this limitation the unit of analysis was the SBU. Practical implications Managers can reflect on and benchmark their motivation for, and opportunities from, servitization, by considering product complexity. Originality/value The first study to categorise servitization motivations by product complexity. Identifying that some customers of systems manufacturers seek business transformation through outsourcing.

scholarly journals An integrative Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) and lean-based approach for development of new complex products

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 425-434
Author(s):  
Aleksander Buczacki
Keyword(s):  
New Product Development ◽  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Integrative Model ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Complex Products ◽  
Model Based ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Tools And Techniques ◽  
Model Based Systems Engineering

Abstract An effective and efficient New Product Development (NPD) and implementation process is crucial for creation of competitive advantage for each company. Due to this fact, companies are more and more often looking for methods and tools for improvement of NPD processes. The paper deals with an integrated Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) and lean approach to NPD. The individual stages of the NPD process are predisposed to different degrees to the use of MBSE and Lean. The research conducted shows that the use of advanced MBSE and lean tools and techniques in the development of new products is not widespread. There is a room for future research.

scholarly journals DETERMINATION OF ENGINEERING DIGITALIZATION MATURITY

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1193-1202
Author(s):  
Mona Tafvizi Zavareh ◽  
Martin Eigner
Keyword(s):  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Product Lifecycle ◽  
Complex Products ◽  
It Architecture ◽  
Management Concept ◽  
Intelligent Products ◽  
Model Based Systems Engineering ◽  
Integration Concept

AbstractEngineering Digitalization enables development of new high intelligent products containing mechanical, electrical, software and communication components. As these complex products are result of multidisciplinary engineering processes, digitalization also enforces companies to raise, adapt and revise their engineering competencies and process capabilities to increase agility and maintain competitiveness. Also, the growing amount of data related to product and processes requires a well-structured management concept. In order to encounter all these changes and new requirements companies should identify their specific strengths and weaknesses and derive needs for action. This paper presents a novel maturity model for evaluation of capabilities of Engineering Digitalization in areas of processes, products, services, data, human and organization. The maturity model enables the detection of enhancement potentials and conception of individual digitalization plans for production companies. It has been composed based on a proven multidisciplinary engineering methodology along the product lifecycle process, which includes Model Based Systems Engineering Methods, and a multilevel IT architecture integration concept.

Informationsqualität in der Produktentwicklung: Modellbasiertes Systems Engineering mit expliziter Berücksichtigung von Unsicherheit/Information Quality in Product Engineering: Model-Based Systems Engineering in Explicit Consideration of Uncertainty

Konstruktion ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 76-83
Author(s):  
Jens Pottebaum ◽  
Iris Gräßler
Keyword(s):  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Engineering Model ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Product Engineering ◽  
Explicit Consideration ◽  
Model Based Systems Engineering

Inhalt Unscharfe Anforderungen, verschiedene Lösungs-alternativen oder eingeschränkt gültige Simulationsmodelle sind Beispiele für inhärente Unsicherheit in der Produktentwicklung. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird ein modellbasierter Ansatz vorgestellt, der das industriell etablierte Denken in Sicherheitsfaktoren um qualitative Aspekte ergänzt. Modelle der Informationsqualität helfen, die Unsicherheit von Ent- wicklungsartefakten beschreibend zu charakterisieren. Mittels semantischer Technologien wird Unsicherheit so wirklich handhabbar – nicht im Sinne einer Berechnung, sondern im Sinne einer qualitativen Interpretation. Dadurch entsteht wertvolles Wissen für die iterative Anforderungsanalyse, die Bewertung alternativer System-Architekturen oder für die Rekonfiguration von Simulationen.

scholarly journals SAVE: Security & safety by model-based systems engineering on the example of automotive industry

Procedia CIRP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 187-192
Author(s):  
Sergej Japs ◽  
Harald Anacker ◽  
Roman Dumitrescu
Keyword(s):  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Automotive Industry ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Model Based Systems Engineering

scholarly journals INTEGRATION OF BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGIE IN CASE OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING IN AN INDUSTRIAL CONTEXT

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1887-1896
Author(s):  
Vahid Salehi
Keyword(s):  
Software Engineering ◽  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Data Entry ◽  
Product Lifecycle Management ◽  
Vehicle Engineering ◽  
Blockchain Technology ◽  
Software Engineering Process ◽  
Lifecycle Management ◽  
Model Based Systems Engineering ◽  
Industrial Context

AbstractCurrently, inconsistent software versions lead to massive challenges for many car manufacturers. This is partly because within the product lifecycle management and the software engineering process, there is no correct handling of software versions for the “data entry” (installation of software on the ECU) of the vehicles. Furthermore, there are currently major challenges for many vehicle manufacturers to ensure transparency, integrity and full traceability of SW data status vis-à-vis the legislator. To counteract these challenges, new solutions in the field of vehicle engineering are to be developed based on a new platform called “CarEngChainNet” and Blockchain technology. On the basis of the “CarEngChainNet” platform, new main and sub-chain chains will be developed that allow tamper-proof SW data management (Peer to Peer and crypto technology) across the entire PLM chain with new methods such as model-based systems engineering of the requirement, function and integration of the SW components in different areas of vehicle development. The aim is to develop new transmission chains of vehicles with individually packaged software artefacts (e.g. ECU software) that can be securely transmitted from server to server into the vehicle.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document