scholarly journals Parenteral nutrition in the critically-ill patient: more harm than good?

2000 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. K. Heyland
Keyword(s):  
Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill Patient ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Patient Studies

While many studies have reported that providing parenteral nutrition (PN) can change nutritional outcomes, there are limited data that demonstrate that PN influences clinically-important end points in critically-ill patients. The purpose of the present paper is to systematically review and critically appraise the literature to examine the relationship between PN and morbidity and mortality in the critically-ill patient. Studies comparing enteral nutrition (EN) with PN and studies comparing PN with no PN were reviewed. The results suggest that EN is associated with reduced infectious complications in some critically-ill subgroups. PN, on the other hand, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in critically-ill patients. When nutritional support is indicated, EN should be used preferentially over PN. Further studies are needed to define the optimal timing and composition of PN in patients not tolerating sufficient EN. Strategies to optimize EN delivery and minimize PN utilization in critically-ill patients are indicated.

In-hospital transfer of the critically ill

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorna Eyre ◽  
Simon Whiteley
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill Patient ◽  
Vascular Access Devices ◽  
Endotracheal Tubes ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Hospital Transfer

While focus has traditionally been on the planning, logistics, and outcome of inter-hospital transfers of the critically-ill patient, attention is turning to in-hospital transfers. Numerically, more in-hospital transfers occur and there is growing evidence that these are associated with a high incidence of adverse events, and increased morbidity and mortality. Appropriate planning, communication, and preparation are essential. Patients should be resuscitated and stabilized (optimized) prior to transfer, to prevent deterioration or instability during transfer. Endotracheal tubes and vascular access devices should be secure. The minimum recommended standards of monitoring should be applied. All drugs and equipment likely to be required during the transfer should be checked and available. Critically-ill patients should be accompanied by personnel with the appropriate knowledge skills and experience to carry out the transfer safely and to deal with any complications or incidents that arise.

Critical Care Implications of Adrenal Disease States

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaun Thompson ◽  
Erin Etoll
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Critical Illness ◽  
Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill Patient ◽  
Disease States ◽  
Adrenal Disease ◽  
Corticosteroid Insufficiency

Adrenal disease in the critically ill patient can present many challenges for the intensivist. Besides primary, secondary, and tertiary adrenal insufficiency, a state known as critical care–related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) has been described. Adrenal insufficiency can pose many issues to the critically ill patient as it can decrease the patient’s ability to respond to the stress that critical illness presents to the human body. Proper recognition and diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency in the critically ill patient can be extremely important in the treatment of these patients and could be a lifesaving intervention if CIRCI is discovered. A less commonly encountered issue of adrenal disease lies in the area of adrenal hormone excess caused by a pheochromocytoma or extra-adrenal paragangliomas. These tumors can release large amounts of endogenous catecholamines that cause significant patient morbidity and mortality if not recognized early and treated appropriately. Although adrenal insufficiency and adrenal excess are less commonly encountered problems in critically ill patients, the recognition and treatment of these disease states can prevent the morbidity and mortality of critically ill patients that suffer from these disease states. This review contains 5 figures, 5 tables, and 89 references. Key words: adrenal insufficiency, hypothalamic-pituitary axis, critical illness–related corticosteroid insufficiency, pheochromocytoma, steroid replacement therapy

scholarly journals Impact of Renal Replacement Therapy on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients—The Nephrologist’s View within an Interdisciplinary Intensive Care Team

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3379
Author(s):  
Matthias Klingele ◽  
Lea Baerens
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Critically Ill Patient ◽  
Late Start

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in critically ill patients with an incidence of up to 50% in intensive care patients. The mortality of patients with AKI requiring dialysis in the intensive care unit is up to 50%, especially in the context of sepsis. Different approaches have been undertaken to reduce this high mortality by changing modalities and techniques of renal replacement therapy: an early versus a late start of dialysis, high versus low dialysate flows, intermittent versus continuous dialysis, anticoagulation with citrate or heparin, the use of adsorber or special filters in case of sepsis. Although in smaller studies some of these approaches seemed to have a positive impact on the reduction of mortality, in larger studies these effects could not been reproduced. This raises the question of whether there exists any impact of renal replacement therapy on mortality in critically ill patients—beyond an undeniable impact on uremia, hyperkalemia and/or hypervolemia. Indeed, this is one of the essential challenges of a nephrologist within an interdisciplinary intensive care team: according to the individual situation of a critically ill patient the main indication of dialysis has to be identified and all parameters of dialysis have to be individually chosen with respect to the patient’s situation and targeting the main dialysis indication. Such an interdisciplinary and individual approach would probably be able to reduce mortality in critically ill patients with dialysis requiring AKI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document