Memory, metamemory, and conditional statistics
1996 ◽
Vol 19
(2)
◽
pp. 193-194
◽
Keyword(s):
The Past
◽
AbstractKoriat & Goldsmith's distinction between encoding processes and metamnemonic decision processes is theoretically and practically important, as is their methodology for separating the two. However, their accuracy measure is a conditional statistic, subject to the unfathomable selection effects that have hindered analogous measures in the past. We also find their arguments concerning basic and applied research mostly beside the point.
2005 ◽
Vol 41
(2)
◽
pp. 151-158