Does grandparental child-care provision affect number, satisfaction and with whom leisure activities are done?

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Merih Ates ◽  
Valeria Bordone ◽  
Bruno Arpino

Abstract This study investigates the impact of non-intensive and intensive supplementary grandparental child care on grandparents’ involvement in leisure activities. Three aspects of leisure activities are investigated: the number/frequency of activities, with whom they are carried out and the subjective satisfaction with them. Beside the possibility of a cumulation effect, the literature suggests that providing grandparental child care might compete with other activities, especially for women. Thus, we consider role enhancement and role strain theories to derive our hypotheses. We use longitudinal data from the German Ageing Survey (DEAS) which contains rich information on the leisure activities of people aged 40 and older. To account for selection into the provision of grandparental child care, we use a within-unit estimation approach (fixed-effects panel models). Our results show that both grandfathers and grandmothers tend to engage in more leisure activities when they provide grandparental child care. While care-giving grandfathers become more likely to engage in activities with family members without changing their engagement outside the family, we found no effect for women in this respect. Nevertheless, grandparental child-care provision modifies satisfaction with leisure activities only for women, reducing it, independently from with whom leisure activities are carried out. These findings suggest that a higher quantity of leisure activities does not necessarily imply higher quality.

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1291-1308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thijs van den Broek ◽  
Emily Grundy

AbstractThe impact that providing care to ageing parents has on adult children's lives may depend on the long-term care (LTC) context. A common approach to test this is to compare whether the impact of care-giving varies between countries with different LTC coverage. However, this approach leaves considerable room for omitted variable bias. We use individual fixed-effects analyses to reduce bias in the estimates of the effects of informal care-giving on quality of life, and combine this with a difference-in-difference approach to reduce bias in the estimated moderating impact of LTC coverage on these effects. We draw on longitudinal data for Sweden and Denmark from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) collected between 2004 and 2015. Both countries traditionally had generous LTC coverage, but cutbacks were implemented at the end of the 20th century in Sweden and more recently in Denmark. We use this country difference in the timing of the cutbacks to shed light on effects of LTC coverage on the impact care-giving has on quality of life. Our analyses show that care-giving was more detrimental for quality of life in Sweden than in Denmark, and this difference weakened significantly when LTC coverage was reduced in Denmark, but not in Sweden. This suggests that LTC coverage shapes the impact of care-giving on quality of life.


2011 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 1775-1805 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Joseph Hotz ◽  
Mo Xiao

We examine the impact of state child care regulations on the supply and quality of care in child care markets. We exploit panel data on both individual establishments and local markets to control for state, time, and, where possible, establishment-specific fixed effects to mitigate the potential bias due to policy endogeneity. We find that the imposition of regulations reduces the number of center-based child care establishments, especially in lower income markets. However, such regulations increase the quality of services provided, especially in higher income areas. Thus, there are winners and losers from the regulation of child care services. (JEL H75, J13, L51, L84)


2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 477-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOËLLE NOAILLY ◽  
SABINE VISSER

AbstractThis article examines the impact of the introduction of market forces on child care provision in the Netherlands. In January 2005, the Dutch government introduced the Child Care Act, replacing the former financing system, which had elements of both supply- and demand-financing, with a fully demand-financing system. As a result, the provision of child care is now driven by market forces. Using data on the geographical location of child care facilities, this article compares the factors affecting the provision of child care in the Netherlands before and after the introduction of the Child Care Act. The results suggest that after the regulatory reform the provision of child care has shifted towards wealthy urbanised areas, characterised by high demand and high purchasing power. This shift has largely benefited for-profit providers particularly active in these markets. In parallel, the results indicate an important drop in child care provision by non-profit organisations, most pronounced in less wealthy rural areas. These findings suggest that the introduction of demand-financing may have implications for the accessibility of child care.


1995 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicky Randall

This article seeks to shed light on the scarcity of public child daycare provision in Britain. Following a brief account of the development of policy since the Second World War, it notes the institutional and discursive fragmentation of the process through which child-care policy has been resolved. However, it concentrates on the way that process has been shaped by the intersection of two variables, the type of issue constituted by child care and the British national policy-making style. It argues that public child-care provision is both a ‘redistributive’ issue, and as such particularly unappealing to recent Conservative governments, and an issue that concerns the family, invoking an ‘ideology of motherhood’. Moreover, national policy style has entailed a reluctance to intervene either in the labour market or in the ‘private’ family sphere. This combination of issue type and policy-making tradition has conspired to marginalize child care on the national policy agenda.


Author(s):  
Jana Kulhánková

In this study, I address contemporary ways of looking after children and care giving roles women play in today's Aboriginal community in Brisbane, Australia. Data were collected through participant observation and interviews during field work in a family care centre managed by Indigenous women with the staff and their clients. My main contribution is in describing how various activities of the centre, such as parental programmes, women's gatherings, and rites of passage reflect the traditional models of child care and women's position in the family environment and how these models are perpetuated again in the modern urban environment. Furthermore, I present the implications for the contemporary Aboriginal community's understanding of their current culture as dynamic and open to change.


Cephalalgia ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 429-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
RB Lipton ◽  
ME Bigal ◽  
K Kolodner ◽  
WF Stewart ◽  
JN Liberman ◽  
...  

Despite an extensive body of research on the individual burden of migraine, few studies have examined its impact on the family. We aimed to assess the impact of migraine on family life both from the perspective of those with migraine and from the perspective of their partners. A validated computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) identified 574 people with migraine from a population sample of 4007 in mainland England, and 568 from 4376 in Philadelphia County, in the USA. Migraine cases with six or more migraine attacks per year and living as married with partners were asked, along with their partners, to participate in this study. In a follow-up interview, questions were asked of the proband (i.e. subject identified with migraine in the survey) about the impact of migraine. Similar questions were also asked of the probands' partners regarding the impact of the proband's migraine on their participation in social, family and leisure activities and on family relationships. The samples from the two countries showed similar characteristics, and were combined. Of 389 people with migraine living with a household partner, 85% reported substantial reductions in their ability to do household work and chores, 45% missed family social and leisure activities, and 32% avoided making plans for fear of cancellation due to headaches. One half believed that, because of their migraine, they were more likely to argue with their partners (50%) and children (52%), while majorities (52-73%) reported other adverse consequences for their relationships with their partner and children, and at work. A third (36%) believed they would be better partners but for their headaches. Participating partners ( n = 100) partly confirmed these findings: 29% felt that arguments were more common because of headaches and 20-60% reported other negative effects on relationships at home. Compared with subjects who did not have migraine regarding their work performance, a statistically significantly higher proportion of migraine partners were unsatisfied with work demands placed on them ( P = 0.02), with their level or responsibilities and duties ( P = 0.02), and with their ability to perform ( P = 0.001). Results from this study show that the impact of migraine extends to household partners and other family members.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon B. Hamill ◽  
Tayari Shorter ◽  
Sarah Singleton ◽  
Carrie Page ◽  
Tabitha Pierce
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document